Recommended Posts

(CNN) -- Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg and his wife were the second-biggest charitable donors in the United States last year, appearing behind only billionaire Warren Buffett on a list of the nation's most generous philanthropists.

Zuckerberg, along with wife Priscilla Chan, gave roughly half a billion dollars ($498.8 million) to the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, according to The Chronicle of Philanthropy.

The group released its annual Philanthropy 50 over the weekend.

The Facebook founder and CEO was one of three tech-industry titans in the list's top five.

The Silicon Valley Community Foundation issues grants for a host of causes in the San Francisco area. In 2012, its charitable causes ranged from programs to teach immigrants English, to groups providing food and shelter to the needy, to funds for victims of the California wildfires.

Zuckerberg donated 18 million Facebook shares to the foundation in December.

Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen was fourth, with $309 million in contributions, mostly to the Allen Institute for Brain Science.

And Google co-founder Sergey Brin and wife Anne Wojcicki, co-founder of genetic-testing company 23andME, were fifth, putting $223 million into their Brin Wojcicki Foundation.

full story

... and not a single mention of Bill Gates?

Probably because Bill makes his donations largely through the B&MG Foundation, which then donates the money to other services. Bill doesn't directly donate that much money (as much as Mark Z. or Warren Buffett, anyway).

Probably because Bill makes his donations largely through the B&MG Foundation, which then donates the money to other services. Bill doesn't directly donate that much money (as much as Mark Z. or Warren Buffett, anyway).

But he owns that foundation, and to date he's given almost 37 billion to charity with another 65-70 billion going to it when he passes away.

Not to mention he actually goes out there and tries to help out, makes sure his money gets spent in worthwhile causes. Other people just throw money at a charity and do nothing else. Hence he deserves to get mentioned far more than a guy who just gave 18 million crappy shares of his own company to a charity.

The list is of commitments made in 2012, does not count previous pledges. Max Norris provides a link. Read it!!!

Read my entire post. I said Gates deserves a MENTION, not a ranking.

Very few of these billionaires who donate money actually go out there and try to make a difference. To most it's just a simple check, sent to a charity. Bill Gates DOES go out there.

But he owns that foundation, and to date he's given almost 37 billion to charity with another 65-70 billion going to it when he passes away.

Not to mention he actually goes out there and tries to help out, makes sure his money gets spent in worthwhile causes. Other people just throw money at a charity and do nothing else. Hence he deserves to get mentioned far more than a guy who just gave 18 million crappy shares of his own company to a charity.

Oh of course, most definitely I agree with you. The only problem there is that if we start including organisations, foundations and companies, these lists would probably be forever inundated with the American Red Cross and similar organisations.

Although to be fair this sounds like one big circle jerk anyway. Of course some of the wealthiest people in America make this list - their charitable tax breaks are going to be bigger then others! (Yes I realise this doesn't apply to everyone on this list, I was partially joking :p)

Oh of course, most definitely I agree with you. The only problem there is that if we start including organisations, foundations and companies, these lists would probably be forever inundated with the American Red Cross and similar organisations.

Ah but that's not how they add to that list ;)

The list only counts new donations or pledges, not donations made on past pledges. Bill Gates did donate something like $350 million but that was to a past pledge hence it doesn't count. However if he made a new pledge, he would have made the list. Rather stupid.

Read my entire post. I said Gates deserves a MENTION, not a ranking.

Very few of these billionaires who donate money actually go out there and try to make a difference. To most it's just a simple check, sent to a charity. Bill Gates DOES go out there.

I don't know why you think he would deserve a mention since this is for a list of 2012 pledges. I mean, if they made a list of worlds greatest living philanthropists, Bill, his wife and Warren would be at the top of that list.

I don't know why you think he would deserve a mention since this is for a list of 2012 pledges. I mean, if they made a list of worlds greatest living philanthropists, Bill, his wife and Warren would be at the top of that list.

See the problem is most people aren't going to read the philanthropy report on why Bill Gates didn't make the list. They're going to read the CNN news report and think oh Gates isn't that big a donor.

Hence...why I said he deserves a mention not a ranking, a mention in the news article (not the report). Sorry should have made that a bit clearer.

K, got it. I agree, it would be nice to make it more known for the general public of how generous they are but I have confidence that their eventual legacy will be well known. The Gates pledging over 95% of their wealth to their foundation. Buffet pledging 99% of his wealth, most to the Gate's foundation. That will amount to over $100 billion to the Gates Foundation add to that the current endowment of the foundation ($35+ billion). Nobody can ignore that when it comes.

See the problem is most people aren't going to read the philanthropy report on why Bill Gates didn't make the list. They're going to read the CNN news report and think oh Gates isn't that big a donor.

If Gates is doing it for the right reasons he wouldn't care if he got a mention or not. Right?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!