Jump to content

Question

Posted

[b] Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0[/b]

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdHJrJw3mI4[/media]

Download
[url="http://www.guru3d.com/files_details/unigine_valley_benchmark_download.html"]http://www.guru3d.co...k_download.html[/url]
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11 answers to this question

  • 0

Posted

Thank you for the heads up, it's what i've been waiting for.

edit: I just ran the bench. I get an avg of 28.4 FPS, score 1186.

This is running a i7 3770, AMD HD 7870 @ 1080 8xAA fullscreen.

I'll do another test next week when my second 7870 comes in.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

Interesting how much slower it gets if you switch it to opengl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

On my i7 920 with a Geforce GTX 660Ti I was getting around 35 -40 frames per second at 1920 by 1200

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

Just in time to make me feel like my brand new 7870 is inadequate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

Here's my new benchmark test with crossfire:
[url="http://postimage.org/image/ns3kxmmxh/"][img]http://s18.postimage.org/ns3kxmmxh/Capturev1.jpg[/img][/url]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

I get around 14-18 fps with my GTX 550Ti at 1080p .... such a shame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

[quote name='RvXtm' timestamp='1361309248' post='595531074']
I get around 14-18 fps with my GTX 550Ti at 1080p .... such a shame.
[/quote]

Meh, its supposed to kill GPUs, so long as you have a decent gaming experience, who cares

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

Quite visually unpleasing, despite the load, just like Heaven.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

[img]http://gyazo.com/b86b1f261b191ff593acb00727efec73.png?1361312302[/img]

With this setup:

[img]http://gyazo.com/55cbc67c1983cd0040593feab56d4bac.png?1361312329[/img]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

[quote name='Phouchg' timestamp='1361311947' post='595531154']
Quite visually unpleasing, despite the load, just like Heaven.
[/quote]

What? Heaven looks incredible. Some things in Valley look a little 'off', but overall it looks pretty good. It's easy to lose touch with how real-time graphics compare to some glamour screenshots you may have seen.

What exactly ARE you comparing heaven/valley with to come to a conclusion of 'visually unpleasing'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted

[quote name='Caleo' timestamp='1361326564' post='595531504']
What? Heaven looks incredible. Some things in Valley look a little 'off', but overall it looks pretty good. It's easy to lose touch with how real-time graphics compare to some glamour screenshots you may have seen.

What exactly ARE you comparing heaven/valley with to come to a conclusion of 'visually unpleasing'?
[/quote]
Skyrim test halls from Nexus, coupled with ENB series, coupled with 4K textures and water overhauls.

And CryEngine real-time demos.

When this one doesn't even have serious cloth sim and character animations, just vast landscapes, tons of trees, some tessel and ugly rain pixel shaders. And 3D, should anyone actually need that kind of turd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.