Question about speed if a router and 1GB switch is connected


Recommended Posts

I have a DSL router provided by my ISP and here is the spec http://www.wikidevi.com/wiki/Alice_IAD_WLAN_4421

I bought a NAS and I wanted to buy a 1GB switch to enable faster data access within my network

I am wondering if I connect the 1GB switch to my router (10/100) & NAS to the swtich would I still get high speed of the swtich

Anything connected via ethernet to the switch would be able to communicate with the NAS at 1Gbps, but if your router is also a wireless router than 100Mbps is the maximum speed any wireless device would be able to communicate with the NAS. The slowest link along the path between the two devices will dictate the maximum speed.

If the interconnect is through the switch, then yes, you will get the Gigabit connection. If not, then you will get 100Mbps. For example, if both your computer and your NAS is on the switch, then that's full speed. If your computer is on the switch, and the switch is connected to your router, and the NAS is also on the router, then it will be 100Mbps.

If the Machine & NAS are wired to the switch, then Gigabit if machine has Gigabit LAN otherwise will run at slowest interface speed

If you have to go through the router, then 100mbps, unless wifi, then however fast your wifi is, 54/65/150/300mbps

kind of hard to be 150/300mbps if the lan ports are 100 ;)

I don't understand the point of trying to say your wireless is 300 when it only has ports that are 100 -- your getting 300 to what? Sure and the hell is not going to be another wireless client because that is /2 automatically..

If you going to be connecting via wireless, what point is the gig switch? Might as well just connect it to your 10/100 ports on your router.

  • Like 2

kind of hard to be 150/300mbps if the lan ports are 100 ;)

I don't understand the point of trying to say your wireless is 300 when it only has ports that are 100 -- your getting 300 to what? Sure and the hell is not going to be another wireless client because that is /2 automatically..

If you going to be connecting via wireless, what point is the gig switch? Might as well just connect it to your 10/100 ports on your router.

The point is that I wanted to enable fast data transfer over the network & I was thinking connecting the NAS to a 1GB Switch and then the switch on to my existing router (which is 10/100)

My laptop is & will be using the WLAN from router but I plan to connect the NAS to switch

If you want to maximize the speed over WiFi then you will need a new wireless router with gigabit ethernet ports.

The maximum speed any communication between the router (10/100) and the switch (10/100/1000) will be 100mbps.

The point is that I wanted to enable fast data transfer over the network & I was thinking connecting the NAS to a 1GB Switch and then the switch on to my existing router (which is 10/100)

The point is, no matter what setup you create, your data transfer will be only as fast as the slowest port/interface it has to travel through

My attempt explaining in paint

Capture.PNG

So that GIGABIT PC has two NIC's (pic above)? You could just connect the PC to the 1Gb switch seeing that it connects to the 100Mb router?

The picture was showing (in a visual form) the types of speeds you'd get if either connection was used.

When a WIRED router says it is 100mbps, you'll reliably get roughly 10MB/sec. When a WIRELESS router says 300mpbs, you won't get anywhere near 30MB/sec. As an example, on wireless 300N connecting to my laptop sitting next to my router, i get a whopping 3-4MB/sec (admittedly, that is quite bad...). And no, there aren't 50 other people sharing the wireless, nor clogging the frequency. (see various sources about wireless 'overheads')

The point of all this? Do not feel like your wireless is being "wasted" by only having a 100mbps wired connected to a 300mbps wireless. Your wired likely still as a lot more "application layer" throughput.

"When a WIRELESS router says 300mpbs, you won't get anywhere near 30MB/sec."

Completely and utterly agree with you!! Then they shouldn't report it as such! Just like when they say 54mbit for G, at best you get about 23mbit or about 3MBps

Its pure marketing nonsense how they report wireless RAW total bandwidth, while in wireless there is a **** load of overhead! So if you head over to smallnetbuilders wireless benchmarks N at 40mhz your looking at like 60mbps tops which ok your 100mbit wire can handle.

My point is they are putting 300Mbps on the box -- when clearly that can not be the case if the wire connections are only 100 ;) Who are they thinking they are fooling?

Also to the OP, unless your going to be connecting something else to the gig switch that can do gig, there is NO point to getting it for your nas if then connecting that to a 100mbit switch on your router and your using wireless anyway.

I would wait to get the switch until you have have other devices connecting at gig. Or you move to a wireless speed that is over 100mbit, ac is out there for example. Some of the 3 stream N can get over 100. But then your going to need another wireless router.. Which will prob have gig lan ports.

To be a bit clearer Detections drawing should of shown a gig connected pc and a 100mbit connected pc vs just the one with both connected and wireless client.

Think of it as a road connecting the devices - if at any point there is a lower speedlimit, then that is the fastest you can go on that path even if part of the path is faster. Example you have a 10/1 mbit internet connection 10 down and 1 up.. Does not matter if your computer was connected to router at 10Gb fastest your going to download is 10mbit

  • 2 weeks later...

Yeah pretty much all of the new ones, unless you buy the cheapest available.

Keep in mind at report 300Mbps speeds of your N, 100 is more than enough. Now if your going to go with say a AC vs N wireless or 3 stream N you might be pushing the 100mbit limit.

But currently the only reason to change out your router for one with gig ports would be to not have to use a gig switch for your gig connected devices. But unless I missed something - if your going to be using wireless to access your NAS then your nas has no use of gig either. The only point of connecting your nas at gig is if you were also going to connect something you wanted to move files back and forth with at gig speeds as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      526
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      146
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!