How to make Android look sexy on a black handset!


Recommended Posts

Turn the wallpaper off

That is all!

img6574medium.jpg

img6575medium.jpg

img6576medium.jpg

So I've been using this Samsung fascinate (black handset) for a month now (my first smart phone) and one day I turned the wallpaper off. I was surprised how much better looking it looked because you couldn't tell were the screen ended and the side of the phone was. Try it!

So I've been using this Samsung fascinate (black handset) for a month now (my first smart phone) and one day I turned the wallpaper off. I was surprised how much better looking it looked because you couldn't tell were the screen ended and the side of the phone was. Try it!

Keep in mind your phone needs to have an AMOLED screen for it to look like that ;) Nokia and Samsung both use those screens, HTC uses LCD.

You can tell its your first smartphone; Any person who has delt with any smartphone can clearly see where it ends.

If you have a good AMOLED screen (super amoled or clear black) it's pretty hard to see where the screen ends and the bezel begins if you're looking at it head on.

4.1 Cyanmod

But ya like someone says just choose black.

Didn't want that option for the "sexy" look. Wanted it to free up even more memory, by disabling the wallpaper function at all.

All black is going to be boring after a while. I usually just use dark wallpapers to save battery, but still have something nice to look at when checking the phone.

Looks nice with a nice plain well done wallpaper that doesn't try to be all graphical. Like a nice grey clean wood panel wall.

Didn't want that option for the "sexy" look. Wanted it to free up even more memory, by disabling the wallpaper function at all.

All black is going to be boring after a while. I usually just use dark wallpapers to save battery, but still have something nice to look at when checking the phone.

Only saves power on amoled, and even then it's insignificant.

Keep in mind your phone needs to have an AMOLED screen for it to look like that ;) Nokia and Samsung both use those screens, HTC uses LCD.

If you have a good AMOLED screen (super amoled or clear black) it's pretty hard to see where the screen ends and the bezel begins if you're looking at it head on.

HTC has used amoled on some and Nokia no longer use it on their top of the line phone since SLCD is better.

Doesn't matter what kind of screen you got. The brighter it's on, the more battery it uses.

Agreed, if I dim my tablets brightness to half, I get a shed load more battery life from it, droid also reports screen being No.1 and WiFi being No.2 for battery killers

Darker wallpapers apparently help too

i generally always either use a solid black background or a textured black background on my phones, i also think it makes widgets easier to see with a lower backlight.

Doesn't matter what kind of screen you got. The brighter it's on, the more battery it uses.

Brightness has zero to do with background color or wallpaper though.

Agreed, if I dim my tablets brightness to half, I get a shed load more battery life from it, droid also reports screen being No.1 and WiFi being No.2 for battery killers

Darker wallpapers apparently help too

How do you get wifi as number 2, have wifi on all the time, and it's less than cell standby. Right in between that and phone not in use which is about the same as google service.

HTC has used amoled on some and Nokia no longer use it on their top of the line phone since SLCD is better.

Um no. Both screens have their drawbacks and their benefits. The 900 screen has far superior blacks and vibrant colors but suffers from over-saturation and viewing angles. The SLCD in the 920 doesn't have deep blacks and the colors aren't as vibrant but the viewing angle is better and readability in sunlight is better. It's a matter of preference rather than one tech is better than the other.

Doesn't matter what kind of screen you got. The brighter it's on, the more battery it uses.

AMOLED screens use next to 0 power to display the color black, however they use a lot more to display white.

How do you get wifi as number 2, have wifi on all the time, and it's less than cell standby. Right in between that and phone not in use which is about the same as google service.

Thats what battery settings in JellyBean report, and droid has always reported that since Honeycomb

This is a tablet though, so no cell, but I definitely see at least 50% better battery life with brightness down to half

Brightness has zero to do with background color or wallpaper though.

You're crazy, man. The darker the color the screen has to display, the less brightness has to be applied for it to properly display the color.

That's why dark wallpapers recommended to save battery life. Has fewer bright colors to stress the screen.

How do you get wifi as number 2, have wifi on all the time, and it's less than cell standby. Right in between that and phone not in use which is about the same as google service.

Just booted the tablet up, but this is the same trend no matter the uptime

Screenshot_2013-02-17-23-33-46.png

Um no. Both screens have their drawbacks and their benefits. The 900 screen has far superior blacks and vibrant colors but suffers from over-saturation and viewing angles. The SLCD in the 920 doesn't have deep blacks and the colors aren't as vibrant but the viewing angle is better and readability in sunlight is better. It's a matter of preference rather than one tech is better than the other.

AMOLED screens use next to 0 power to display the color black, however they use a lot more to display white.

The ONLY advantage to amoled today is the black levels, which gives it "dynamic" contrast. SLCD has better colors, viewing angles, daytime viewing and real contrast

You're crazy, man. The darker the color the screen has to display, the less brightness has to be applied for it to properly display the color.

That's why dark wallpapers recommended to save battery life. Has fewer bright colors to stress the screen.

Ugh, no. ONLY if its amoled, on any other screen the light is a uniform LED based backlight on a diffuser plate. Meaning a all black or all white creek use exactly the same amount of power. Theonly thing affecting the power use on a LCD based screen is brightness setting of the screen.

You're crazy, man. The darker the color the screen has to display, the less brightness has to be applied for it to properly display the color.

That's why dark wallpapers recommended to save battery life. Has fewer bright colors to stress the screen.

A standard LCD screen (not OLED) has two parts, a backlight and the LCD. If you have a black area on the screen, the backlight doesn't dim because you still need the backlight on to allow the other parts of the screen to show through. To display black, the LCD is just blocking out the light of the backlight in that area.

Some LED TVs can dim part of the backlight in a dark area of the picture, but I don't think any phones can do that.

So really on a phone with an LCD display showing a black screen with the brightness at full and a white screen with the brightness at full should be pretty much the same.

On LCD, the backlight is ALWAYS on. And to display dark colors, you need to un/twist the crystals to prevent that light from passing on to the front. So technically, black screens on LCDs require more energy than a white screen. I wouldnt say that all black or all white on LCD use the same amount of power. In terms of the backlight, yes, it remains constant (unless you have local dimming), but the liquid crystals are mmm in their default position so you dont use extra energy.

In AMOLEDs, yeah, a black pixel is turned off so it saves battery, and white would use more battery.

Brightness is another thing. On LCDs, a higher brightness means cranking up the backlight. on AMOLED I guess you apply more energy to get brighter pixels.

You're all are crazy, people :) No matter the technology, lower voltage usage always going to be on the side of displaying darker colors.

Displaying lighter pixels (bright colors), is more draining on the battery than to display darker pixels (dark colors). It's like if you light two fires and will want to make the second one brighter than the other one, you'll have to feed it more wood. No other way around it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Very fitting name since AI users have air where there brains should be.
    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      532
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!