Recommended Posts

Hey guys, anyone willing to help with a media heavy build? I've been debating getting back into PC gaming for some time but I don't know if I'm quite there yet. I've decided I'd rather build a media server with the possibility of upgrading the GPU, RAM, etc. if necessary, in a year or less should I fall back into PC games.

The wife would love for me to budget this at $500 or less, I'd like to spend $1k. Wife won lol. I know I could do $500 for a media server but I was hoping I could stretch that as much as possible with an i5 and the best GPU I can afford for now. I know I should probably be looking at AMD for this budget but I was still hoping to get some extra lifespan and upgradability with an i5.

Only things I really want are: i5 (if possible), reliable Blu-ray burner, room for several hard drives, as silent as I can afford (so probably no water cooling).

This build will be the media server for the house and be hooked up to the living room TV. So ripping and encoding Blu-rays/ playing 1080p files, some in home music recording, etc.

Anybody think they could come up with a great combo that will fit my budget? I know it's not a lot but I can't spend $1500 like I used to on new builds. Fatherhood has its ups and downs. lol

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1138596-media-and-gaming-build/
Share on other sites

Honestly if you're looking for the best GPU $500 will barely cover it, if cover it all..

Blu-Ray burners run about $100

i5 will cost you alone like 180ish and higher

SSDs are nice, but expensive and not as much space..

Realistically your best bet for CPU is an AMD for th emoney you have

Edit: honestly I would suggest getting the FX-8150, then saving up for the GPU or vice versa.. get the GPU first then the CPU

Honestly if you're looking for the best GPU $500 will barely cover it, if cover it all..

Blu-Ray burners run about $100

i5 will cost you alone like 180ish and higher

SSDs are nice, but expensive and not as much space..

Realistically your best bet for CPU is an AMD for th emoney you have

Edit: honestly I would suggest getting the FX-8150, then saving up for the GPU or vice versa.. get the GPU first then the CPU

I said best GPU I could afford, not best GPU out there. ;) I'm not one to buy parts individually. By the time I get the massive GPU I want the other components I've bought would likely have gone down in price. So I try to cherry pick all at once. I do however build barebones sometimes just to get a deal on CPU, mobo and GPU then reuse other parts I have or wait for sales on Blu-ray drives, etc.

While everyone is contemplating the Gaming / Mediacenter build for $500, can someone find me a brand new racing car for under $10k?

You know your post did nothing for this conversation so I'll just leave it at that.

Seeing as how lifehacker posted up a media center build for under $500 a few months ago I thought maybe someone would have a more up to date option.

Yes after I posted I realized you did NOT say the best GPU out there hehe. Did you look at the CPU/MOBO combos??

I typically do get things not as bundles unless there is an awesome deal.. I buy from different places, shop/compare and look over reviews..

I would also get into truly understanding what your buying (understanding jargon, what certain technologies offer, etc...), so you can know whats going on.

If you give me more of a basis on how much you plan on dedicating to the GPU, CPU and motherboard, then I can better advise you.

Edit: FYI the GPU is what you typically want to spend more on

Don't worry, I've been building PCs for years but my overclocking days are over and the only gaming I do anymore is on my 360. Marriage and fatherhood, oh how the times have changed for me. lol

Anyway, I'm looking at a media center build but I wanted to see if there was an upgrade path anyone would recommend so I don't lock myself into a media PC completely. Maybe if I get bit by the gaming bug again I will throw down money on a new GPU. I would increase the budget but I'm about to upgrade several other things such as router, NAS, hard drives, etc.

I will even go to onboard GPU if it will get me a media heavy build, 1080p playback, rip/ encode/ burn Blu-rays, etc. with the option to splurge on a GPU within a year or so from now. That's why I'd like to stretch this to an i5 if I can. That way the foundation is there for at least some gaming down the road.

Then get the CPU and the motherboard im getting :) or different motherboard.

Intel Core i5-3570K Ivy Bridge 3.4GHz BX80637I53570K - $229.99

GIGABYTE GA-Z77X-UD4H - $164.99 | ATX Form: 12.0" x 9.6"

Subtotal: $394.98

You can find those cheaper (I found the CPU cheaper by $60)

That motherboard has the ability to expand and upgrade and its latest chipset

I saw your thread. I'm not gonna be overclocking though so I could go another route and save plenty of money for the rest of the build. Though I did think maybe I should barebones it if I can find a sale and upgrade later. I may end up going AMD just for a media center and wait a bit for a gaming rig.

No worries, I already knew I wasn't getting a K. I was hoping someone would offer an option, or sale I haven't spotted, for an affordable and reliable CPU and mobo combo that would still be decent for gaming. I don't want to go completely bottom of the barrel and would like to stick with some major names for the mobo in particular. I know that most cheap builds will run the media side that I want but I'd like to give myself a little breathing room for the next year or so.

<snip>

Seeing as how lifehacker posted up a media center build for under $500 a few months ago I thought maybe someone would have a more up to date option.

You cna run a mediacenter on a raspberry pi, but something capable of all your requests/demands requires something more substantial.

I know I could opt for something cheaper. I already have a WDTV. But that means a dedicated device. I won't be able to do what else I'm asking about. I wouldn't be able to upgrade.

My requests are not that high I think. I said i5 only if possible. I just want Blu-ray ripping/ encoding/ burning. Maybe a home recording studio but I've got that covered.

Surely there is some middle ground to be found. If its not an i5 I would still consider. I just wanted to see just how much I can scrape by, if at all, and thought someone else would have made a similar build or could recommend an affordable rig.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!