'Jesus' jeans maker cracking down

By Hum
in Real World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
Posted

The Italian jeans company that owns the trademark on the name "Jesus" in the U.S. is cracking down on apparel companies that wish to use the name in their brand.

The Wall Street Journal reports the company, called Jesus Jeans, persuaded the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to allow them to register the word "Jesus" as a trademark in 2007, giving them exclusive rights in the U.S. to the name.

The company owns the trademark just on the name "Jesus," not on the image of Christianity's central figure.

Since then, Jesus Jeans has launched a crusade against at least a dozen U.S. companies selling Jesus-themed apparel, mostly start-up clothing lines. Its litigators claim the companies are appropriating the name "Jesus" without the trademark owner's blessing.

Attorneys for the company say their trademark is similar to the trademark owned by Nike, whose namesake is the winged goddess of victory.

"If somebody, small church or even a big church, wants to use 'Jesus' for printing a few T-shirts, we don't care," Domenico Sindico, the general counsel for intellectual property for Jesus Jean's parent company BasicNet told The Wall Street Journal.

Sindico says the company is concerned when other apparel companies attempt to use their trademark for profit.

BasicNet first applied for a "Jesus" trademark registration in 1999, and was granted the trademark eight years later.

The company has attempted to trademark the name "Jesus" in numerous other countries around the globe, but most of the applications have been denied. :laugh:

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1138666-jesus-jeans-maker-cracking-down/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

LaP

Posted
Posted

The Wall Street Journal reports the company, called Jesus Jeans, persuaded the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to allow them to register the word "Jesus" as a trademark in 2007, giving them exclusive rights in the U.S. to the name.

The is definately worthy of a captn Picard double facepalm image.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27

      By Copernic · Posted

      TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • Neowin's 2026 GNU/Linux Desktop Thread

      By remixedcat · Posted

      My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • ABSTRACT//AWESOME//WALLPAPERS - made by me!

      By remixedcat · Posted

      thank you!
    • Apple and Tesla Supplier Tata Electronics Confirms 630 GB Data Theft: iPhone Specs on Dark Web

      By +Nik Louch · Posted

      Ooopsie!
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent

      By Hamid Ganji · Posted

      A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!