Recommended Posts

I know that I'm not the greatest at this stuff. Normally I'm impressed with pfsense, but I've got an issue that I can't quite figure out. Right now, for some reason, I can access the webgui for my pfsense box from my WAN port, something that I do not want since my WAN port is exposed to the internet. I changed the default webgui part to 88, and created a rule to block all WAN traffic to port 88 but still I can access it by typing in the wan ip address and port into the web browser. Here's a screenshot of the firewall rules. The first rule should allow ssh traffic from the WAN port (internet) to a specific device on my network. The second rule should block any WAN traffic to port 88. The first rule works properly, the second does not. I think that there's a conflict somewhere... any ideas? Thanks.

post-5498-0-63048900-1361905924.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1138726-pfsense-disable-webgui-on-wan/
Share on other sites

the web gui would not be open to the public wan IP.. You should not need a specific rule! By default ALL unsolicited traffic to wan is blocked by default.

You sure your accessing it via wan and not the lan?

How do you have your pfsense setup in your network.. Is the wan on the public NET!! or is it behind a nat already? On a work call currently, but as soon as finishes will take a look at the pfsense config to allow it to happen.

Also what version are you running? 2.0.2, 2.1? 2.0.3 ?

I just checked mine and its not open to public - are you accessing it via a nat reflection or something. Since you have changed the port, have you check the Disable webConfigurator redirect rule option the advanced settings.

post-14624-0-48686900-1361910054.png

What I think could be happening is you have the antilockout rule running on your lan. and then hitting it maybe via nat reflection?

BTW: Such a question is better suited for the pfsense forums, very responsive people there! Me being one of them ;) Just use a different nick there.

You are correct, it was NAT reflection that was allowing me to access the webgui; canyouseeme shows the port as closed.

However, now I have another problem. I have a NAT rule to forward traffic on port 22 to a local IP address, and it automatically created the needed firewall rule as you can see in the screenshot on the original post, but canyouseeme shows port 22 as closed. Here's the NAT redirect rule:

If WAN TCP

SRC addr = *

SRC ports = *

DEST addr = WAN address

DEST ports = 22

NAT IP = (IP address of device I want external access to)

NAT ports = 22

I have deleted the firewall rule to block traffic on port 88, but have left the rule to allow traffic on port 22

the pfsense box WAN port is connected to internet, no other NAT device on the network.

I'm running pfsense 2.0.2

glad you got it all sorted.. I don't have nat reflection even enabled - I personally have no use for it, nor do I really understand any use for such a thing.. Why would you bounce off your routers wan IP just to be directed back to a local box.. Just hit the local box directly - setup your name resolution accordingly, etc.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
    • Watch Louis Rossmann's recent experience on YouTube about trying to get a warranty replacement from Samsung. It's crazy.
    • That is the thing, how many of these people don't realise they are using AI? If they use Google Search they have no choice but to use AI. So yes, maybe half of American adults do use and I expect a lot of Uk adults do to, but I bet most of them don't realise it. Myself, i avoid the rubbish.
    • They use FREE AI. They aren't paying for this meme-generating slopware...
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!