Student Catches Alleged Thief on Camera

By Hum
in Real World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
Posted

A California high school student was shocked at what she found when she decided to play detective and stop a string of thefts from backpacks during gym class.

Justine Betti said she decided to hide in a locker to see if she could catch the thief in action. She didn?t expect the alleged culprit to be her gym teacher.

After all of the students left the locker room, the teacher stayed behind, rummaged through backpacks and took money, Betti said.

?Something needed to be done. That?s not okay,? she told ABC News? Sacramento affiliate KXTV. Betti is a sophomore at Linden High School in Linden, Calif., about 60 miles southeast of Sacramento.

Betti decided to hide in the locker again ? this time, with a cellphone camera to record what she saw. She set up a second camera in another locker to get two angles.

Once again, she said she saw the teacher go through the bags. Her video shows someone digging through the bags, and one video appears to show the person taking something out of a pink duffel bag.

?I didn?t want to believe that she would do something like that because she was so nice, but then she did it,? Betti said. ?It was really scary. I was like, ?Oh my gosh. I can?t believe I just got this on video.??

Betti said she kept watching it ?over and over? and eventually took the video to her principal with some friends.

?He said that he?ll investigate it and he told us to delete the video, but I had already sent it to my dad,? she said.

The teacher is on administrative leave, according to KXTV. The Linden School District told ABCNews.com that it is investigating the matter.

The teacher has not been identified, but is a 30-year teaching veteran described as a ?great teacher? by many students.

source & video

Grand Master

jerzdawg

Posted
Posted

we used to have an issue with our gym teacher stealing things from students however, it was not money, he would steal panties and things from the girls locker room.

perhaps things were different when I was in high school but we only changed our clothes for gym, not our underwear... After school sports were different with showers.. anyway.. thats one messed up teacher

Veteran

Richteralan

Posted
Posted

we used to have an issue with our gym teacher stealing things from students however, it was not money, he would steal panties and things from the girls locker room.

You should buy some from walmart and give to the teacher. He obviously needs some spare underwear.

/s

Grand Master

The Evil Overlord

Posted
Posted

So the head advised her to delete the recording..... wtf???

Good thing she sent a copy to her dad. Teachers are supposed to be model figures, and this person is abusing the trust placed on her.

One thing I don't get -- who is dumb enuff to leave money in a backpack ...

welllll if that's how you spell enough..... :p
  • Rohdekill and Hum
  • Like 2
Grand Master

Hum

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Where else would they leave it though? You can't really play sports with a bunch of money stuffed down your socks.

I thought most schools had lockers -- which can be locked.

Or are they old-fashion .... ?

And I'd sure put at least paper money in the bottom of my shoe, before I'd be leaving it laying about.

Grand Master

redvamp128

Posted
Posted

Principal told them to destroy potential court evidence? Seems like two people should be charged, one for theft, one for tampering with evidence.

So the head advised her to delete the recording..... wtf???

Good thing she sent a copy to her dad. Teachers are supposed to be model figures, and this person is abusing the trust placed on her.

welllll if that's how you spell enough..... :p

Sounds like a cover up is already in progressed. Schools are the very worst at that.

I fully understand both your points- and I would agree with the Why tell her to delete it? but it is probably somethings we don't know..

..I asked a lawyer about this and this was his reply.

First of all depending on the state that this occurred .. Public such as a cafeteria or the football field (which a locker room is consider private) video taping is admissible in court but private is not at least not without a court permission. It would actually have to be done by Law Enforcement in order to be admissible in court and court approved for the location of the video to be recorded.

The investigation should have been done with Law Enforcement due to some possible problems of the teacher bringing charges against the child that video taped her and the school system.

This is partially because normal video taping there are signs that say one is being video taped. (in some states he told me that was illegal video taping someone without consent or prior posting of all activities are being video taped such as a bank or store)

Even though by evidence with looks alone that she is doing the act but in the video there is no confirmation some item was taken by the owners of the bag which should have also been included on the tape.

One major point to note also why there was the suggestion of deletion of the video is this:

Now should she have accidentally recorded a MINOR in a locker room In any form of undress on that tape then she could actually be charged with a serious crime. Also so would her father. We are talking child po rn here which is a serious crime. (he also went on to remark that even if she recorded herself on that tape in the locker room would possibly be considered that) (he also said it is one thing for a professional locker room to be on tape, but this is a High School Locker Room and a FEMALE locker room .... MAJOR RED FLAG FOR RECORDING)

I guess this is why- in most cases police fully document items they think a thief would steal as well as document the numbers on money. Which he also said the easy way to confirm this would have been to take money mark it.. then confront the principle after the theft to check the teacher for theft of the money and it would have confirmed it. (IE taking a picture of the 20$ that was the plant)

Instead he said this possibly could backfire if the teacher has a good lawyer.

Grand Master

Detection

Posted
Posted

I'd have copied the video to my machine, then pulled the gym teacher to one side and shown her, told her to return everything she took or it gets shown to everyone

That would more than likely stopped her thieving again, and everyone gets their stuff back

Grand Master

The Evil Overlord

Posted
Posted

~snip~

Ok fair point, but to me, if the evidence is destroyed, then it just becomes hearsay, and unless the teacher was naked then filming her stealing really shouldn't be such a big deal, for I think she did her school, and by extension, her community a service. But hey, that's just me.

Grand Master

redvamp128

Posted
Posted

Ok fair point, but to me, if the evidence is destroyed, then it just becomes hearsay, and unless the teacher was naked then filming her stealing really shouldn't be such a big deal, for I think she did her school, and by extension, her community a service. But hey, that's just me.

Yes but the location of the filming was a problem.... - Some places a Locker room would be considered Private and therefore illegal and not be able to be admissible in court. (it is the filming in such places that the teacher could bring the girl up on charges for)

I thought the same thing.... she looks guilty... They should have done as the lawyer friend suggested... marking money with neon reaction ink as well as noting the numbers on it. Then confronting the teacher with the money then bring up on charges with law enforcement.

That would have been the way setting up a sting instead of possibly allowing the teacher to sue the school and the girl.

Grand Master

xpablo

Posted
Posted

Gym teacher should be charged for theft and also fired and never be permitted to teach in a public school ever again. The principle should be fired for telling the student to destroy the evidence.

There should be a full investigation of all teachers in the entire school district to see if this is common, since the principle told the student to destroy the evidence, could he have been an accessory

to this?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Ford execs say they made a mistake when they replaced human engineers with AI

      By Cenata8bit · Posted

      All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval

      By excalpius · Posted

      And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval

      By excalpius · Posted

      Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • I ANE

      By Barney T. · Posted

      Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States

      By Hamid Ganji · Posted

      Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!