Recommended Posts

A California high school student was shocked at what she found when she decided to play detective and stop a string of thefts from backpacks during gym class.

Justine Betti said she decided to hide in a locker to see if she could catch the thief in action. She didn?t expect the alleged culprit to be her gym teacher.

After all of the students left the locker room, the teacher stayed behind, rummaged through backpacks and took money, Betti said.

?Something needed to be done. That?s not okay,? she told ABC News? Sacramento affiliate KXTV. Betti is a sophomore at Linden High School in Linden, Calif., about 60 miles southeast of Sacramento.

Betti decided to hide in the locker again ? this time, with a cellphone camera to record what she saw. She set up a second camera in another locker to get two angles.

Once again, she said she saw the teacher go through the bags. Her video shows someone digging through the bags, and one video appears to show the person taking something out of a pink duffel bag.

?I didn?t want to believe that she would do something like that because she was so nice, but then she did it,? Betti said. ?It was really scary. I was like, ?Oh my gosh. I can?t believe I just got this on video.??

Betti said she kept watching it ?over and over? and eventually took the video to her principal with some friends.

?He said that he?ll investigate it and he told us to delete the video, but I had already sent it to my dad,? she said.

The teacher is on administrative leave, according to KXTV. The Linden School District told ABCNews.com that it is investigating the matter.

The teacher has not been identified, but is a 30-year teaching veteran described as a ?great teacher? by many students.

source & video

we used to have an issue with our gym teacher stealing things from students however, it was not money, he would steal panties and things from the girls locker room.

perhaps things were different when I was in high school but we only changed our clothes for gym, not our underwear... After school sports were different with showers.. anyway.. thats one messed up teacher

we used to have an issue with our gym teacher stealing things from students however, it was not money, he would steal panties and things from the girls locker room.

You should buy some from walmart and give to the teacher. He obviously needs some spare underwear.

/s

So the head advised her to delete the recording..... wtf???

Good thing she sent a copy to her dad. Teachers are supposed to be model figures, and this person is abusing the trust placed on her.

One thing I don't get -- who is dumb enuff to leave money in a backpack ...

welllll if that's how you spell enough..... :p
  • Like 2

Where else would they leave it though? You can't really play sports with a bunch of money stuffed down your socks.

I thought most schools had lockers -- which can be locked.

Or are they old-fashion .... ?

And I'd sure put at least paper money in the bottom of my shoe, before I'd be leaving it laying about.

Principal told them to destroy potential court evidence? Seems like two people should be charged, one for theft, one for tampering with evidence.

So the head advised her to delete the recording..... wtf???

Good thing she sent a copy to her dad. Teachers are supposed to be model figures, and this person is abusing the trust placed on her.

welllll if that's how you spell enough..... :p

Sounds like a cover up is already in progressed. Schools are the very worst at that.

I fully understand both your points- and I would agree with the Why tell her to delete it? but it is probably somethings we don't know..

..I asked a lawyer about this and this was his reply.

First of all depending on the state that this occurred .. Public such as a cafeteria or the football field (which a locker room is consider private) video taping is admissible in court but private is not at least not without a court permission. It would actually have to be done by Law Enforcement in order to be admissible in court and court approved for the location of the video to be recorded.

The investigation should have been done with Law Enforcement due to some possible problems of the teacher bringing charges against the child that video taped her and the school system.

This is partially because normal video taping there are signs that say one is being video taped. (in some states he told me that was illegal video taping someone without consent or prior posting of all activities are being video taped such as a bank or store)

Even though by evidence with looks alone that she is doing the act but in the video there is no confirmation some item was taken by the owners of the bag which should have also been included on the tape.

One major point to note also why there was the suggestion of deletion of the video is this:

Now should she have accidentally recorded a MINOR in a locker room In any form of undress on that tape then she could actually be charged with a serious crime. Also so would her father. We are talking child po rn here which is a serious crime. (he also went on to remark that even if she recorded herself on that tape in the locker room would possibly be considered that) (he also said it is one thing for a professional locker room to be on tape, but this is a High School Locker Room and a FEMALE locker room .... MAJOR RED FLAG FOR RECORDING)

I guess this is why- in most cases police fully document items they think a thief would steal as well as document the numbers on money. Which he also said the easy way to confirm this would have been to take money mark it.. then confront the principle after the theft to check the teacher for theft of the money and it would have confirmed it. (IE taking a picture of the 20$ that was the plant)

Instead he said this possibly could backfire if the teacher has a good lawyer.

I'd have copied the video to my machine, then pulled the gym teacher to one side and shown her, told her to return everything she took or it gets shown to everyone

That would more than likely stopped her thieving again, and everyone gets their stuff back

~snip~

Ok fair point, but to me, if the evidence is destroyed, then it just becomes hearsay, and unless the teacher was naked then filming her stealing really shouldn't be such a big deal, for I think she did her school, and by extension, her community a service. But hey, that's just me.

Ok fair point, but to me, if the evidence is destroyed, then it just becomes hearsay, and unless the teacher was naked then filming her stealing really shouldn't be such a big deal, for I think she did her school, and by extension, her community a service. But hey, that's just me.

Yes but the location of the filming was a problem.... - Some places a Locker room would be considered Private and therefore illegal and not be able to be admissible in court. (it is the filming in such places that the teacher could bring the girl up on charges for)

I thought the same thing.... she looks guilty... They should have done as the lawyer friend suggested... marking money with neon reaction ink as well as noting the numbers on it. Then confronting the teacher with the money then bring up on charges with law enforcement.

That would have been the way setting up a sting instead of possibly allowing the teacher to sue the school and the girl.

Gym teacher should be charged for theft and also fired and never be permitted to teach in a public school ever again. The principle should be fired for telling the student to destroy the evidence.

There should be a full investigation of all teachers in the entire school district to see if this is common, since the principle told the student to destroy the evidence, could he have been an accessory

to this?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • According to Microsoft, Cause: One of the drivers controlling the device notified the operating system that the device failed in some manner.   https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/error-codes-in-device-manager-in-windows-524e9e89-4dee-8883-0afa-6bca0456324e
    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!