Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Titanfall - Discussion, news and reviews||
|can't see PS4 or Xbox One lasting more than 5 years.||
|Photoshop has gone too far *NSFW*||
|Malaysia Airlines 'loses contact with plane' (and search effort updates)||
|Network computers not showing up.||
Posted 27 February 2013 - 19:22
Posted 27 February 2013 - 19:39
Posted 27 February 2013 - 19:52
Haven't been into shooters forever since I refused to pay for XBL. Now that I have a PS3, I'm wondering which of these 2 games has a better online element for a causal gamer
Posted 27 February 2013 - 19:54
You'd be crazy to buy MW3 over Black Ops 2.
Posted 27 February 2013 - 20:00
Price for one. MW3 I can get for $13, BO2 is around $35
Posted 27 February 2013 - 20:12
The MW3 servers are probably dead.
Posted 27 February 2013 - 20:22
Posted 27 February 2013 - 20:25
Posted 27 February 2013 - 20:38
What servers? COD is p2p on consoles
MW3 is still in the top 5 games played on Xbox live at the moment, I assume its a similar situation on PS3
As for choosing between MW3 and Black Ops II, they're both pretty awful online experiences
Posted 27 February 2013 - 21:16
It can certainly be overwhelming at first but BF3 gets better the more effort you put into it.
MW3 is still popular, there are just about as much on PC as blops 2. I prefer MW3.
I never really got in to battlefield TBH, i tried playing it a few times but maps just seemed huge. I prefer the casual hectic feel of COD
Posted 27 February 2013 - 21:25
Posted 27 February 2013 - 22:03
This is what I tried to say - but explained better
as an average FPS player myself i went with BF3 much better game play and not just spawn shoot die type game maps are MUCH bigger gives you a chance to play and learn vs jumping right in and having to pray to live