Jump to content



Photo

HTML5 hole in major browsers... well, except for Firefox


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 xMorpheousx416

xMorpheousx416

    Neowinian

  • 639 posts
  • Joined: 02-May 04

Posted 02 March 2013 - 00:17

Really surprised this hasn't hit Neowin's desk by now.

http://www.maximumpc...ur_hard_dive856


#2 SiCKX

SiCKX

    Cannibal

  • 1,258 posts
  • Joined: 23-November 06
  • Location: Errywhere
  • OS: Windows 7 x64

Posted 02 March 2013 - 00:24

Saw it the other day on Gizmodo.
http://gizmodo.com/5...rive-with-trash

#3 +Phouchg

Phouchg

    Random Oracle

  • 5,551 posts
  • Joined: 28-March 11
  • Location: Tannhäuser Gate
  • OS: V'Ger 6.1.7601 x64

Posted 02 March 2013 - 13:40

The glorious future of the mighty Flash killer. Welcome, welcome. We've been expecting you. With all your ridiculously stupid troubles, too.

#4 The_Decryptor

The_Decryptor

    STEAL THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

  • 19,292 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 02
  • Location: Sol System
  • OS: iSymbian 9.2 SP24.8 Mars Bar

Posted 02 March 2013 - 14:47

So the browsers at risk don't follow the recommendations the standard says they should, kinda funny.

I wonder if IndexedDB would be susceptible to an attack like this.

#5 +_Alexander

_Alexander

    Neowinian

  • 1,001 posts
  • Joined: 21-January 13

Posted 02 March 2013 - 21:01

I am glad we are replacing Adobe Flash with this new technology.

#6 vetsanctified

sanctified

    Your order is meaningless. My chaos is significant.

  • 20,907 posts
  • Joined: 29-November 01
  • Location: ø
  • OS: OS X 10.9 and Xubuntu 14.04
  • Phone: iPhone 5 (very cheap second hand)

Posted 02 March 2013 - 21:07

The glorious future of the mighty Flash killer. Welcome, welcome. We've been expecting you. With all your ridiculously stupid troubles, too.


I know! Flash have never EVER have holes and security faults!
...
...
...


Shall I continue?

#7 +_Alexander

_Alexander

    Neowinian

  • 1,001 posts
  • Joined: 21-January 13

Posted 02 March 2013 - 21:12

I know! Flash have never EVER have holes and security faults!
...
...
...


Shall I continue?

>missing the point of the post quoted entirely

#8 Athernar

Athernar

    ?

  • 2,928 posts
  • Joined: 15-December 04

Posted 02 March 2013 - 21:13

Mmm, yes.

Please, tell me more about how everyone should use Webkit instead of following open web standards. :whistle:

#9 keuka

keuka

    Neowinian

  • 725 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 05
  • Location: United States of America

Posted 02 March 2013 - 21:22

In other news... http://www.cemetech....jects/jstified/

#10 paxa

paxa

    Neowinian

  • 761 posts
  • Joined: 04-June 04
  • Location: so far away....nearly in the end of the world

Posted 02 March 2013 - 23:03

not trying to flame or anything, just my two cents....this serves to prove that nothing is flawless....instead of jumping the gun and trying to drop flash/flex and so on to adopt html5, one should wait until the platform matures enough and standards are set in stone.

#11 PhilTheThrill

PhilTheThrill

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,871 posts
  • Joined: 28-November 03
  • Location: Canada
  • OS: Win 8.1
  • Phone: WP8

Posted 02 March 2013 - 23:26

HTML5 isn't even a set standard yet chaps...

...and web storage is only at recommendation stage.

in other words...it's like complaining that is a house is cold before the builder has installed the doors and windows.

#12 +Phouchg

Phouchg

    Random Oracle

  • 5,551 posts
  • Joined: 28-March 11
  • Location: Tannhäuser Gate
  • OS: V'Ger 6.1.7601 x64

Posted 02 March 2013 - 23:43

^ Well, then perhaps we shouldn't have moved into this house yet... and set the old rented apartment ablaze with such a profound sensation of accomplishment? Gosh knows it may start to rain fish and the roof may not hold as well.

#13 Athernar

Athernar

    ?

  • 2,928 posts
  • Joined: 15-December 04

Posted 03 March 2013 - 01:12

one should wait until the platform matures enough and standards are set in stone.


If the effected vendors had actually paid attention to the spec that specifically has recommendations to stop this from occuring, naturally this wouldn't of happened.

Props to Mozilla for actually paying attention.

#14 Javik

Javik

    Beware the tyrrany of those that wield power

  • 5,885 posts
  • Joined: 21-May 12

Posted 03 March 2013 - 01:22

Mmm, yes.

Please, tell me more about how everyone should use Webkit instead of following open web standards. :whistle:


Given that the problem affects Trident and Presto as well that's a pretty stupid comment to make.

#15 Athernar

Athernar

    ?

  • 2,928 posts
  • Joined: 15-December 04

Posted 03 March 2013 - 01:30

Given that the problem affects Trident and Presto as well that's a pretty stupid comment to make.


No, you just think it's stupid because you're a "Google shill", to borrow your own terminology from other threads.

This not only proves that open web standards and adherence to them is important, but that having a single rendering/layout engine is a bad thing.



Click here to login or here to register to remove this ad, it's free!