Recommended Posts

NO BODY PARTS came tumbling out, but there was still plenty of drama Wednesday in Common Pleas Court as the aggravated-assault retrial of Matthew Brunelli unfolded.

Prosecutors have accused Brunelli, 23, of punching onetime bouncer John "Big Red" Huttick in the left eye with an object - possibly a car key - outside a Burholme bar on Aug. 18, 2011, leaving Huttick with a gruesome wound that ultimately caused the eyeball to be removed.

A mistrial was granted in February after Huttick's glass eye shockingly popped out while he wept on the witness stand.

Brunelli's attorney, Eileen Hurley, tried unsuccessfully to persuade Judge Robert P. Coleman to grant another mistrial Wednesday after Assistant District Attorney Mark Gilson likened Brunelli to the "Incredible Hulk" during his opening statement to the jury.

Hurley was also irate because Gilson said that Brunelli had " 'roid rage" when he punched Huttick after decking Brian Clerkin, an off-duty Philly cop, and one of Clerkin's friends outside the New Princeton Tavern on Rising Sun Avenue.

Hurley said the statements had tainted jurors' opinions of Brunelli.

Coleman didn't approve the motion for the mistrial, but did ask that the reference to " 'roid rage" be banned from both sides during the remainder of the trial.

Hurley said Clerkin relentlessly hit on Brunelli's girlfriend at the bar. Hurley said one of Clerkin's buddies challenged Brunelli to a fight because he felt emboldened by the fact that the Princeton is a "cop bar."

Gilson said that Huttick went outside and tried to intervene after Brunelli, a physical trainer, knocked down Clerkin and his pal.

Brunelli, Gilson said, was "in a rage" and "sucker-punched [Huttick] in the eye with a sharp object." Four months later, Huttick's mangled eye was removed by surgeons.

Hurley said Brunelli had used his fist to defend himself.

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1140442-eyes-are-a-poppin/
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!