Jump to content



Photo

Sugar-Free Bakery Closed, for using sugar

new jersey fda investigation butterfly bakery mislabeling

  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#16 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 16 March 2013 - 04:09

Diet anything is the Evil. :crazy:


Amen, Brother Hum. Preach the Word!


#17 n_K

n_K

    Neowinian Senior

  • 5,426 posts
  • Joined: 19-March 06
  • Location: here.
  • OS: FreeDOS
  • Phone: Nokia 3315

Posted 16 March 2013 - 04:23

Not for diabetics.

Depends really, sugar isn't good for anyone heck sugar and heat causes bacteria to multiply at a very fast rate.
On the other hand, sugar is natural, isn't linked with 90+ medical problems, wasn't pushed to get legalised/licesed in america for many years being rejected each time until, for some strange reason, the FDA team were fired and replaced with 'new staff' who approved it right away.
Yeah, I'd rather have sugar.

#18 Gabe3

Gabe3

    If you lack enemies, you are not doing something worthwhile

  • 1,438 posts
  • Joined: 19-October 05
  • Location: Florida

Posted 16 March 2013 - 04:51

ha, story reminds me of the fat free yogurt seinfeld episode.

#19 pgn1

pgn1

    Neowinian

  • 16 posts
  • Joined: 16-March 13
  • Location: United States
  • OS: Windows 8 / Custom Desktop / Surface RT / Surface Pro
  • Phone: Windows Phone 8 / Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 16 March 2013 - 04:56

It's a good thing the FDA was out there putting a stop to all those burger places that were using pink slime in their burgers claiming/giving the impression they were selling 100% beef burgers!!! oh wait they didn't.

Guess all that money coming in from lobbyists from the big boys keeps the fda away, not really possible for a small bakery that used a little too much sugar.

#20 HawkMan

HawkMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • 22,258 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway
  • Phone: Noka Lumia 1020

Posted 16 March 2013 - 11:38

Pink slime is and was 100% beef, just part of the beef that's less desireable and harder to get. pink slime is not what you think it is or what some of the conspirationalists want you to think it is.

#21 francescob

francescob

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,368 posts
  • Joined: 04-November 08

Posted 16 March 2013 - 11:45

Pink slime is and was 100% beef, just part of the beef that's less desireable and harder to get. pink slime is not what you think it is or what some of the conspirationalists want you to think it is.

Posted Image

#22 theyarecomingforyou

theyarecomingforyou

    Tiger Trainer

  • 16,977 posts
  • Joined: 07-August 03
  • Location: Terra Prime Profession: Jaded Sceptic
  • OS: Windows 10 Preview
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 3 with Galaxy Gear

Posted 16 March 2013 - 12:02

Pink slime is and was 100% beef, just part of the beef that's less desireable and harder to get. pink slime is not what you think it is or what some of the conspirationalists want you to think it is.


It's exactly what we think it is - scraps of poor quality animal matter that can't be extracted naturally (i.e. by a butcher) but that have to be separated from the bone using heated centrifuges, then chemically processed with ammonia gas to make fit for human consumption. Just because it comes from animals doesn't mean it can be called "meat". That might be fit for animal consumption but it certainly shouldn't be in the human food chain. When people buy a meat product that is not what they expect.

#23 HawkMan

HawkMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • 22,258 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway
  • Phone: Noka Lumia 1020

Posted 16 March 2013 - 13:14

Actually that's not true. A butcher would be able and would extract that meat. But in todays more efficient butchery it's not effective so bones are left with significant amount of meat left on them, they are then sent on to be "mechanically" de-meated.

#24 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 16,113 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 16 March 2013 - 14:47

Depends really, sugar isn't good for anyone heck sugar and heat causes bacteria to multiply at a very fast rate.
On the other hand, sugar is natural, isn't linked with 90+ medical problems, wasn't pushed to get legalised/licesed in america for many years being rejected each time until, for some strange reason, the FDA team were fired and replaced with 'new staff' who approved it right away.
Yeah, I'd rather have sugar.


Sugar is bad, but you'd rather have sugar?

Umm.. I'm guessing you mistyped something there. :p

#25 OP Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 63,574 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 16 March 2013 - 15:30

It's exactly what we think it is - scraps of poor quality animal matter that can't be extracted naturally (i.e. by a butcher) but that have to be separated from the bone using heated centrifuges ...


In other words, dog food. :dog:

#26 AwayfromHere

AwayfromHere

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,012 posts
  • Joined: 03-January 12
  • OS: Windows 10 Preview
  • Phone: Sony Xperia Z3

Posted 16 March 2013 - 15:36

Not sure, if sarcasm or plain stupid.


Yeah, go on a year without any traces of sugar or glucose. I dare you.

#27 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 16,113 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 16 March 2013 - 17:09

Yeah, go on a year without any traces of sugar or glucose. I dare you.


I know many diabetics who do just that. They're fine.

#28 AwayfromHere

AwayfromHere

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,012 posts
  • Joined: 03-January 12
  • OS: Windows 10 Preview
  • Phone: Sony Xperia Z3

Posted 16 March 2013 - 17:15

I know many diabetics who do just that. They're fine.


You do know what Insulin is for right and how it works? And saying that diabetics don't eat sugar what so ever is as wrong, they do they just can't eat as much as regular people do. The fact remains, brain can't function properly without any glucose and for regular people sugar is the fastest/easiest way to consume some.

#29 zhangm

zhangm

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,113 posts
  • Joined: 21-August 02

Posted 16 March 2013 - 17:20

Yeah, go on a year without any traces of sugar or glucose. I dare you.


You do know what a sugar is, right?

#30 chrisj1968

chrisj1968

    copyrighted!! ©

  • 4,483 posts
  • Joined: 17-June 08
  • Location: United States

Posted 16 March 2013 - 17:21

sweet... :huh: oops