4 posts in this topic

PATERSON, NJ (AP) ? The New Jersey man who just won a $338 million Powerball jackpot has resolved a child support debt.

Pedro Quezada appeared Monday afternoon in state Superior Court in Paterson.

Authorities had said the 44-year-old Passaic resident owed about $29,000 in back support for three of his five children.

During the court hearing, officials said Quezada had paid $30,000 to settle the debt. He also told the judge in Spanish that the three children would now be living with him.

During the hearing, state Superior Court Judge Ernest Caposela commended Quezada for taking care of the back child support, but noted that he will still be obligated to pay support in amount that could be modified.

Currently, Quezada is responsible for $141 per week for three children. Caposela said either Quezada or the mother of the children could apply for a modification of the child support amount.

"There are going to be a lot of people who are going to ask you to invest in things because of your good fortune," Caposela told Quezada, "but investing in your children is the wisest investment you can make."

more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"There are going to be a lot of people who are going to ask you to invest in things because of your good fortune," Caposela told Quezada, "but investing in your children is the wisest investment you can make."

A wise statement. But if the wife applies for modification of the child support amount and the kids are living with him, is she just trying to get her share?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A wise statement. But if the wife applies for modification of the child support amount and the kids are living with him, is she just trying to get her share?

Since the money was "won" during the time she was supporting the kids, she is still entitled to a percentage of the winnings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since the money was "won" during the time she was supporting the kids, she is still entitled to a percentage of the winnings.

Seems to me the kids are entitled but she is not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.