• 0

Question

Hey gang,

I have a media application (Bedia, free available here: http://www.blissgig.com/display.aspx?id=13 ) that I have added speech recognition. The problem is that on some lower end systems the SR causes the audio playback to become "off" from the video playback, usually by only a fraction of a second. I am using WMP as the audio/video playback.

The question is, I am thinking of having a threaded class that does the monitoring for the speech recognition, but before I go down that path I thought I'd ask for any thoughts? Is there anything I should be aware of or......

I know the question is a bit vague, I am attempting to avoid mentioning specifics so that any and all issues for this process are brought up.

Thank for your time.

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If I understand well, you're currently handing the audio data to a speech recognition API before handing it to WMP, which can cause the audio to become out of sync? It's pretty strange that this is happening, but I'm not familiar with WMP.

In any case, doing this on separate thread would work as long as you're actually handing out the data to the processes (WMP and SR) in parallel and not having one waiting on the other, otherwise you're not gaining anything by using multiple threads.

  • 0

Thanks Dr.

The speech commands affect Play, Pause, other playback controls as well as menu commands. I really don't know why the audio becomes unsynced so the idea of moving the SR to another thread is a shot in the dark. I have completed the code in a test bed and will move it into the app in the next few days. I will drop a note here to let everyone know how it goes.

The nice part of the SR being on another thread is that some of the processing (is a command valid, etc) is within that thread and SHOULD not affect any playback. I just return a string that informs the base app what I need to do, just as if the user had pressed a mouse button.

Have a great day.

James

  • 0

Thanks Dr.

The speech commands affect Play, Pause, other playback controls as well as menu commands. I really don't know why the audio becomes unsynced so the idea of moving the SR to another thread is a shot in the dark. I have completed the code in a test bed and will move it into the app in the next few days. I will drop a note here to let everyone know how it goes.

The nice part of the SR being on another thread is that some of the processing (is a command valid, etc) is within that thread and SHOULD not affect any playback. I just return a string that informs the base app what I need to do, just as if the user had pressed a mouse button.

Have a great day.

James

Did you do it delegate style? Or are you constantly checking a string for a value?

  • 0

Did you do it delegate style? Or are you constantly checking a string for a value?

Yes I am using a Delegate, thanks for asking. Only when acceptable conditions have been met is a string sent back to the calling thread. This is why I thought about going this route, all the work to insure that this is an acceptable command before affecting the app. I really do appreciate you asking to make sure.

Peace,

James

  • 0

Yes I am using a Delegate, thanks for asking. Only when acceptable conditions have been met is a string sent back to the calling thread. This is why I thought about going this route, all the work to insure that this is an acceptable command before affecting the app. I really do appreciate you asking to make sure.

Peace,

James

I know some people will thread things but then sit there waiting for the thread to finish/do something instead of carrying on and doing what needs to be done away from the thread and acknowledging when the thread has something for it. That's the reason I asked.

But yea, logically if the thread is just sitting in a loop like:

wait for command

process command

if command is good raise the event

repeat

and the main program is sitting in a

play movie/sit in idle state

**Event raised**

check event

do event

repeat

And there is no reliance on one or the other to preform individual tasks and you aren't sitting there in a:

while (x != y) or while(myThread.ThreadState == ThreadState.Running)

Then I don't see why it wouldn't work, and it should work better than a non-threaded system.

  • 0

Thanks again Firey,

Your diagram statement is exactly what is going to happen (I haven't added my new class to my app yet. I almost always create a test bed application to insure that it is working on it's own before adding it to the real application)

I still find it strange that the audio becomes unsynced.... but when I shut down the SR option, which disposes of the SR components, the issue goes away. I state this in case anyone else ever has the issue that they know that someone else has seen it.

Have a fun day.

  • 0

Thanks again Firey,

Your diagram statement is exactly what is going to happen (I haven't added my new class to my app yet. I almost always create a test bed application to insure that it is working on it's own before adding it to the real application)

I still find it strange that the audio becomes unsynced.... but when I shut down the SR option, which disposes of the SR components, the issue goes away. I state this in case anyone else ever has the issue that they know that someone else has seen it.

Have a fun day.

One thing to check, would be CPU usage. I know that in some cases High CPU usage can cause things to become un-synced. If the playback has full video decoding frames can be ready and display but the CPU can't keep up with keeping things (like the Audio) synced properly.

  • 0

One thing to check, would be CPU usage. I know that in some cases High CPU usage can cause things to become un-synced. If the playback has full video decoding frames can be ready and display but the CPU can't keep up with keeping things (like the Audio) synced properly.

Interesting thought. The app has run for two+ years on this lightwight machine but with the addition of SR it could be hitting high. I will check this out, thanks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I agree when are you going to read this (really poor BTW) article?
    • I disagree; they come off very "bitchy" and "whiny". Make a great product and combine that with a great price (free) and people will come over to your side. Or build it and they will come as they say. Constantly trying to get attention by complaining all the time, will turn people off to your product.
    • It use to be a nightmare, with LibreOffice supporting a newer draft ODF standard by default, and Microsoft Office supporting the older non-draft standard. Now that they both support the same version of ODF, they should be interoperable.
    • Brave Browser 1.91.171 by Razvan Serea Brave Browser is a lightning-fast, secure web browser that stands out from the competition with its focus on privacy, security, and speed. With features like HTTPS Everywhere and built-in tracker blocking, Brave keeps your online activities safe from prying eyes. Brave is one of the safest browsers on the market today. It blocks third-party data storage. It protects from browser fingerprinting. And it does all this by default. Speed - Brave is built on Chromium, the same technology that powers Google Chrome, and is optimized for speed, providing a fast and responsive browsing experience. Brave Browser also features Brave Rewards, a system that rewards users with Basic Attention Tokens (BAT) for viewing opt-in ads. This innovative system provides an alternative revenue model for content creators and a way to support the Brave community. SlimBrave Neo takes all the good things about Brave and makes them even better by keeping everything clean, light, and privacy-focused. It removes the extra clutter, turns off features you might not need, and cuts down on anything that could slow you down or collect unnecessary data. Because it relies on simple settings and policies instead of modifying the browser itself, you still get full Brave compatibility—just in a smoother, lighter, and more privacy-friendly package. Brave Browser 1.91.171 changelog: General Fixed Cardano not being disabled on upgrade to Brave Origin. Upgraded Chromium to 149.0.7827.103. Origin Removed “Survey Panelist” setting from brave://settings/privacy. Fixed P3A and usage ping under brave://settings/privacy being displayed on first launch on Linux. Upgraded Chromium to 149.0.7827.103. Download: Brave Browser 64-bit | 1.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Brave Browser 32-bit View: Brave Homepage | Offline Installers | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hi. As the title suggests, I can't access the forum on my phone. I'm using Edge on Android and when I try to navigate to the forum I get a "we value your privacy" popup and none of the buttons are clickable. It effectively stonewalls me from reading any forum content.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      190
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!