Nintendo Direct: Wii U System Update Brings Virtual Console And More Next W


Recommended Posts

Starting next week, it's going to take a little less time to navigate your Wii U. During this morning's Nintendo Direct presentation, president Satoru Iwata shared details about next week's planned Wii U system update.

A number of convenience improvements and features are on the menu, with faster loading and transition times coming. Additionally, Wii U owners will soon be able to move data between external USB drives, automatically install downloaded software (currently requiring manual intervention), update software automatically, and put the console into standby without terminating downloads.

The Wii menu will be accessible directly upon booting up by holding the B button on the GamePad, but those that access that emulation for the virtual console will be glad to know that a Wii U version of that service is on the way. Coming next week after the system update, gamers will be able to play classic titles in new ways.

Off-screen mode will be enabled for all Wii U Virtual Console games, which is an enormous improvement. Additionally, each of those titles will have a Miiverse community.

The bad news is that Wii Virtual Console titles will not transfer to the new Wii U service. If you want to take advantage of the functionality, you'll need to pony up another $1 per NES title and $1.50 per SNES title. No explanation was given for the upgrade charge, and it seems that only a select number of titles will be available at the start. Game Boy Advance and Nintendo 64 titles will be coming in the future. No mention was made of the other platforms that were featured on the Wii's Virtual Console.

Source

hopefully the virtual console for the WiiU will be able to render at 720 or 1080 even if the GUI remains scaled or something. well at least for the 3D games anyway though.

playing old SNES titles on the pad screen while semi paying attention to something on tv is going to be awesome though.

hopefully the virtual console for the WiiU will be able to render at 720 or 1080 even if the GUI remains scaled or something. well at least for the 3D games anyway though.

playing old SNES titles on the pad screen while semi paying attention to something on tv is going to be awesome though.

I think it's a bit cheeky charging $1/1.50 to upgrade though.

I think it's a bit cheeky charging $1/1.50 to upgrade though.

Doesn't matter to me, I never had a Wii. and why, it's required a rewrite again just like when it was updated for the Wii.

Do you also expect your PSN or XBLA games to work on the next gen for free directly ? granted if rumors of the 360 SOC is true that might actually happen, though I wouldn't hold my breath.

seems fair enough that they get compensated for their work to me.

If you played a game on the Wii's virtual console will it be carried over. If not its a ****take that some games will be paid for a third time -.-

It already said in the OP that you need to pay a small upgrade fee. and yes, it sucks that you actually have to pay for peoples hard work doesn't it. you should tell your boss about your feelings on the matter ;)

It already said in the OP that you need to pay a small upgrade fee. and yes, it sucks that you actually have to pay for peoples hard work doesn't it. you should tell your boss about your feelings on the matter ;)

I will bet every penny I own that the only thing required is an extra wrapper of DRM. They don't re-write these games every time.

Would you also like to go and buy all your wii games again to play it on the Wii U? Or how about if Microsoft said "Well, you can play the games you already bought on the new console, but you'll have to pay ?1 per game to play it?". As I said, it's cheeky at best.

I will bet every penny I own that the only thing required is an extra wrapper of DRM. They don't re-write these games every time.

Would you also like to go and buy all your wii games again to play it on the Wii U? Or how about if Microsoft said "Well, you can play the games you already bought on the new console, but you'll have to pay ?1 per game to play it?". As I said, it's cheeky at best.

I wouldn't have expected to be able to play my Wii games on my WiiU anyway, that is if I had a Wii, which I didn't. I also don't expect to play my 360 games on the next xbox. why would I, it's a new console.

as for these new games, it's already been stated by nintendo that they have been somewhat redone again to take advantage of the gamepad, which surely justifies the meager upgrade price for them. Be happy they don't charge you full again, they could just as easily have done that.

And if MS said that I had to pay a small price per game because they had to do recoding and some recompiling, yes, that is justifiable. I bought the game for another console.

Awesome :) I hope to pick one up soon.. Only game I want though is New Super Mario Brothers Wii-U

You should! It's an awesome game - I've beaten it with all 5 stars in the save file from Nov 18th to Dec 9th. :)

as for these new games, it's already been stated by nintendo that they have been somewhat redone again to take advantage of the gamepad, which surely justifies the meager upgrade price for them.

Got a link for that? I'm not sure what re-coding would be needed at game-level for the gamepad.

I will bet every penny I own that the only thing required is an extra wrapper of DRM. They don't re-write these games every time.

Would you also like to go and buy all your wii games again to play it on the Wii U? Or how about if Microsoft said "Well, you can play the games you already bought on the new console, but you'll have to pay ?1 per game to play it?". As I said, it's cheeky at best.

DRM is handled at the system level on any modern console. Why would they add extra DRM to the virtual console if the Wii U has yet to be compromised? Furthermore, to better integrate with the Wii U system and services, they would have to rewrite the emulator front end... or at least greatly modify it.

I remember iTunes charging some small amount per song to remove the DRM when they went DRM-free. It's the same concept, I guess.

I hope they update the VC games besides just the gamepad streaming, but in regards to at least adding online multiplayer to some of their titles. A lot of the N64 games were tailored around 4 player multiplayer and it would be great to be able to play the party games online with my friends. The current method via netplay emulation on the PC is just way too unreliable. I'm not holding my breath for it though.

Well for one the games will have MiiVerse support. there was some article earlier listing some other optimizations done one a game by game basis. hopefully the pal conversion issue is one of them. unlike the Wii, all WiiU VC games will apparently also have customizeable button layout.

I was actually asking around to try and sell my WiiU Deluxe, the most I could get for it, including Mario, was $225. Was just to great of a loss for me personally, especially since I hardly touched it.

Perhaps this will get me playing it again, but I have not been so disappointed in picking up a system at launch EVER. And I was pretty damn disappointed by the Wii actually, but this easily beats it. The fact games are being cancelled and/or they are not as good as their current console counterparts (Kotaku just reported on the new fighter game Injustice being gimped compared to the 360 & PS3 versions) just truly adds to the disappointment overall.

Truly wish I never purchased it.

There is always the OUYA to make me regret something even more though. :rofl:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!