Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Introducing the Universal Windows Platform Bridges||
|‘Shawshank’ Fugitive Arrested 56 Years After Escape||
|PCI-E extension/riser cable||
|Xbox One will reportedly include TV DVR feature soon||
|Should people be afraid of doing online banking?||
Posted 12 May 2013 - 05:08
Posted 12 May 2013 - 05:11
Looks great! No halo effect that is a marker for an HDR shot.the tonality is awesome. You did well..
Posted 12 May 2013 - 05:15
Posted 12 May 2013 - 05:23
Posted 12 May 2013 - 06:17
Posted 12 May 2013 - 06:34
I like the photos, one because they're all amazing shots, and two because they are high resolution photos of Pakistan, which is REALLY interesting. Who is the guy on the banner?
Posted 14 May 2013 - 04:34
Posted 14 May 2013 - 06:18
thank you....btw what is "halo effect" ?
Posted 14 May 2013 - 13:46
Posted 14 May 2013 - 20:30
Well I would avoid shooting trees for HDR images, as usually when merging, you get that "haze" effect on them due to movement, i'm not saying it can't be done, i'm saying it's more difficult to shoot HDR for moving subjects than still ones.
Posted 14 May 2013 - 20:39
Agree, but if you look at the bushes and trees of the OPs, exactly that is happening.
Most modern HDR mergings, which is technically tone mapping as the pictures themselves are not HDR, will pick objects from only one exposure when there's movement to avoid just that.