4 posts in this topic

It sounds like a nice idea, if you don?t own a calculator. The governor of Wisconsin wants to give his residents a tax break, using the revenue from a proposed Internet Sales tax to lower the state?s income tax. ?I want to make clear, should federal Marketplace legislation become law, my intention would be for any resulting additional revenue be used to provide individual income tax relief for Wisconsin?s taxpayers,? Wrote Governor Scott Walker to members of Congress.

The Marketplace Fairness Act will permit state governments to collect sales taxes from any business that both grosses more than $1M in revenue and has a substantial operating base in their region. Earlier this month, a draft of the bill passed the U.S. Senate with overwhelming bipartisan support, but faces tougher opposition in the House, where Republican leadership is concerned that the law will be a logistical nightmare for small businesses.

Although, I wouldn?t get too excited. With 5 million residents in Wisconsin and an estimated $95M in savings, that?s about $16/per person, assuming it would be distributed evenly. If Forrester?s research is any indication, the sales tax would cost the average American roughly $167 per year, so it?s a net loss. If it?s unevenly distributed, a few already wealthy people will be slightly wealthier.

Still, it?s a nice gesture.

http://techcrunch.com/2013/05/17/wisconsin-gov-promises-to-use-internet-sales-tax-to-lower-income-tax/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although, I wouldn?t get too excited. With 5 million residents in Wisconsin and an estimated $95M in savings, that?s about $16/per person, assuming it would be distributed evenly. If Forrester?s research is any indication, the sales tax would cost the average American roughly $167 per year, so it?s a net loss.

We can't win for losing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I see it, it's not that easy to keep track of what people sell online and collect tax from them. Now it means that a lot of people wont pay the tax because of that and then the GOV will have to create yet another enforcement agency or add more and more jobs to an existing agency. That means more money that the GOV will have to spend on that. So the money they will collect from Internet tax will go to fund addition jobs the GOV needs to actually collect the tax.

Maybe I don't see it right, I donno. That's just my thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts are that the implementation and maintenance costs for such a device would be astronomical ans gulp up most if not all of the expected income.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.