Recommended Posts

Why does Microsoft earn money from Android handset manufacturers ? Accoring to this article

http://bgr.com/2013/05/01/microsofts-android-licensing-agreements-earnings/

" Google unlawfully used technology from Oracle, Microsoft and others when creating its Android and Chrome operating systems "

Why handset makers have to pay ? Should Google pay to Microsoft ?

handset makers pay because they are given the OS freely and somehow that absolves Google. Handset makers have to pay for all the patents in Android I think - MPEG, H264, WiFi, etc

When you license a Microsoft product you are automatically protected by them, an umbrella I think is the term, from anyone suing you because you are using a Microsoft product that potentially infringes a patent.

Google would never pay, and/or MS feels that if they forced google to pay google would try to invalidate their patents or sue them for other things that would cost them even more money

Google doesn't make any money directly (except for motorola) from Android while handset makers do make money. That is why microsoft/apple chose to go after the handset makers.

Why does Microsoft earn money from Android handset manufacturers ? Accoring to this article

http://bgr.com/2013/...ments-earnings/

" Google unlawfully used technology from Oracle, Microsoft and others when creating its Android and Chrome operating systems "

Why handset makers have to pay ? Should Google pay to Microsoft ?

because these handset manufacturers are profiting off stolen intellectual property.google is profiting,but its harder to prove damages,because they make their money from advertising. it isn't a question of whether Microsoft can nail google through litigation, they can,theres do doubt about it, google doesn't have any valuable patents to defend themselves ,its just that they can make more money going after handset manufacturers because profit numbers are clear cut and much more than they would be able to squeeze out of google.

Why does Microsoft earn money from Android handset manufacturers ? Accoring to this article

http://bgr.com/2013/...ments-earnings/

" Google unlawfully used technology from Oracle, Microsoft and others when creating its Android and Chrome operating systems "

Why handset makers have to pay ? Should Google pay to Microsoft ?

Though Android may be developed by Google, the handset manufacturers customize and develop the platform for their phones themselves as well. As a result, in addition to Android itself violating patents, the changes the OEM's make can also violate patents that will need to be licensed.

Additionally, as Google develops Android "As Is", they do not provide patent protection of any kind to the OEM's that use it. So, really, if you want to look at it that way, this really comes down to Google not standing behind their own product and protecting their OEM's...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times
    • We had no idea as kids how much time and energy it took to be an adult 😅
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval by David Uzondu Image via @realDonalTrump (X) As OpenAI prepares the release of its next model, GPT 5.6, the White House has instructed the company to limit the distribution of the software to a small group of government-approved partners instead of the general public, as it has done with previous releases. According to The Information, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman sent an internal memo to staff on Thursday explaining that the federal government will approve access "customer by customer" during an initial preview phase. Altman noted in the communication that this restrictive rollout is "not [their] long-term model" for software deployment, and the company plans to work toward a "more sustainable" distribution method later. CNN said that both OpenAI and the Trump administration view the capabilities of GPT 5.6 on the same level as Anthropic's Mythos and that government officials intend to "collaborate with frontier AI labs to develop shared approaches for addressing the challenges of scaling this technology." The latest restriction comes just weeks after the US Commerce Department decided to restrict Fable, a version of Mythos with extra safety "guardrails" to prevent users from exploiting software vulnerabilities. Not long after the release, though, researchers at Amazon found a way to bypass these restrictions, prompting an aggressive response from federal authorities. The government ordered Anthropic to cut off access for non-US citizens located outside the US, non-US citizens living inside the US, and incredibly, even Anthropic's own foreign-born employees. Anthropic now appears to be building a workaround to resolve this compliance block with an update to its Privacy Policy that introduces a category called "Verification Data" to handle KYC and Digital IDs. This setup could mandate digital identity checks to filter users by nationality, requiring a government-issued ID and facial biometric data. Who knows? Maybe in the future, you would have to scan your US Passport or State ID to prove your citizenship before you are allowed to chat with Fable 5 (or any other model).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!