10 posts in this topic

The hero shrew ? a small, ratlike animal with a bizarrely strong and oddly shaped backbone ? has mystified scientists since it was first described more than 100 years ago. Now, a newly discovered species of hero shrew may help researchers piece together why the animal evolved to have such a peculiar spine and what purpose the hardy backbone serves now.

The hero shrew's unique backbone gives the animal extraordinary strength, said lead study author William Stanley, collections manager of mammals at The Field Museum in Chicago. The animal's lower back has 10 to 11 lumbar vertebrae (the bones that make up the lower spine) that jut out and interlock with one another, he added. In comparison, humans have five lumbar vertebrae between the rib cage and the pelvis that help support the weight of the body.

"The hero shrew has the most bizarre mammalian backbone in the world," Stanley told LiveScience.

For more than 100 years, the hero shrew was classified as only one species, but a new species has been discovered in central Africa that has an expanded backbone and only eight lumbar vertebrae. Although the spine appears to be slightly different from that on the original hero-shrew species, molecular evidence indicated the two are closely related, the researchers said.

more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And that's what dinosaurs "evolved" into:

 

 

hero-shrew-skeleton.jpg1374613645

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nature can be amazing diverse. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And that's what dinosaurs "evolved" into:

hero-shrew-skeleton.jpg1374613645

No, dinosaurs did not evolve into mammals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evolution as it is now believed, is rubbish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evolution as it is now believed, is rubbish.

 

Why is that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so why plant doesn't develops backbones in course of evolutions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so why plant doesn't develops backbones in course of evolutions?

 

 

Plants, are not like Mammals, as such plants do not require backbones to support their weight, plus they do not have a skeletal body. Go read more bibles, maybe u can find the answer there... I think some where between adam and steve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so why plant doesn't develops backbones in course of evolutions?

they did, there called trunks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.