Only in the US could they find a way to privatise the police state and bill innocent people after subjecting them to unreasonable searches.
Even those convicted of crimes have rights and should not be subjected to such unreasonable searches. We're talking about seven procedures here (1x anal probe; 3x enemas; 2x full body X-rays; and 1x colonoscopy), some of which are incredibly invasive and have risks attached to them. This is a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment. Further, it is absolutely unacceptable to charge people for the medical tests they are required to take.
it may not say it, but what i am betting happened is this. Upon getting stopped, the police of course pull up your plate # and see your info and can see prior criminal history. When they asked him for licence and registration, they probably asked as well if he had any drugs or weapons on his person. Being the type of character that would do this, he probably said "yes, officer, up my ass" in sarcasm. After any mis-read sarcastic remark, the office assumed he was serious (or thought maybe if he said it was there, maybe I won't actual check there) and took him for the checks. As for the # of checks performed, the anal checks are NOT separate instances, but rather all a check. After manual finger inspection, the guy most likly was still going on his "screw authority" and after said "are you sure you didn't find anything? better dig deeper, they are there" .... knowing full well he was trying to gain as much ammo as possible for a lawsuit or media story. Xrays are also done back-back and are NOT separate incidences, Even if so, xrays sometimes must be re-taken for accuracy, maybe the first bunch didn't turn out.
separate note: you don't even like the US Constitution, why now do you defend it?