Jump to content



Photo

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 +Frank B.

Frank B.

    Member N° 1,302

  • 24,223 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 01
  • Location: Frankfurt, DE
  • OS: OS X 10.10
  • Phone: iPhone 6

Posted 20 May 2014 - 08:17

Apple cites 'jihadist' and 'Vietnam' insults as Samsung settlement hope fades

 

Both sides manufacture outrage over stalled settlement talks

 

Not even a day after a new report that Apple and Samsung had resumed settlement talks, lawyers from both sides have expressed difficulties with one another. As part of a court-mandated update from the pair, following the conclusion of their second major US trial earlier this month, lawyers from both companies said settlement talks had not only been a failure in the past, but were stymied by actions following the trial.

 

For Apple, that includes statements made by Samsung's lead attorney John Quinn, who referred to Apple as a "jihadist" and called the protracted trial "Apple's Vietnam" in a pair of interviews. In a letter between the two law firms dated last week, Apple's law firm WilmerHale expressed reservations about spending additional time on discussing settlement options based on those interviews. The firm also accused Samsung of using the initial settlement talks to license Apple's patents in order to "clone Apple products," something the iPhone-maker called "counterfactual."

 

On Samsung's side, the company's lawyers claimed Apple was lording over it using court victories to dictate any possible settlement terms. That included discussions to reduce patent royalty payments, something the two companies have warred over extensively. Moreover, whatever Samsung's top lawyer had to say about that matter, had "little, if anything" to do with the company's willingness to settle, Samsung wrote in the filing, adding that it believed Apple sought to "impose an obstacle" to reaching a resolution.

 

The filing comes just days after Apple settled with Google's Motorola Mobility unit in a long-running series of lawsuits worldwide, though this battle with Samsung has been far more personal. While the two are rivals, Samsung is firmly entrenched as the top maker of Android phones, something Apple has long viewed as a "stolen" product.

 

The back-and-forth between the two sides suggests neither corporate behemoth was particularly interested in reaching a settlement, despite overtures to the contrary and pleas from Judge Lucy Koh. With the potential damages a mere scratch on each company's bottom line, and sales bans only affecting long-obsolete products, Apple and Samsung have little motivation to settle. Both sides' lawyers are essentially making excuses to avoid reconciling on the real issues.

 

The second major trial between the two companies wrapped up earlier this month, with a California jury deciding that both Apple and Samsung infringed on one another's patents. However the brunt of that was on Samsung, which was found to infringe on three of Apple's patents, and owed $119,625,000 as a result. Apple was found to infringe on one of Samsung's patents, resulting in $158,400 in damages. Both numbers were far below what the companies wanted from one another, which in Apple's case was originally $2.191 billion.

 

Source: The Verge




#2 +techbeck

techbeck

    It's not that I am lazy, it's that I just don't care

  • 19,630 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 20 May 2014 - 11:58

Yea, just read this after the frontpage post about them settling.  Thought it was a bunch of BS.



#3 Enron

Enron

    Windows for Workgroups

  • 10,713 posts
  • Joined: 30-May 11
  • OS: Windows 8.1 U1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 900

Posted 20 May 2014 - 12:10

I think Samsung should just go ahead and pay Apple $3 billion and call it a day.



#4 Brian M.

Brian M.

    Neowinian Senior

  • 12,822 posts
  • Joined: 07-January 05
  • Location: London, UK

Posted 20 May 2014 - 12:11

The firm also accused Samsung of using the initial settlement talks to license Apple's patents in order to "clone Apple products," something the iPhone-maker called "counterfactual."


I'd say they were pretty spot on.

#5 #Michael

#Michael

    Neowinian Senior

  • 6,270 posts
  • Joined: 28-August 01

Posted 20 May 2014 - 21:00

I think Samsung should just go ahead and pay Apple $3 billion and call it a day.

 

It's not like samsung doesn't have the money.  I still don't understand why they can't just settle and move on.



#6 +_Alexander

_Alexander

    Neowinian

  • 1,427 posts
  • Joined: 21-January 13
  • Location: USA
  • OS: W8.1 u1
  • Phone: Nokia 521

Posted 21 May 2014 - 03:20

I wonder when big companies will get sick and tired of lawsuits and lobby for reform.