• 0

Newbie C++ Help


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

[edit] wouldn't be bad to make this a sticky thread, so others may be able to use it without me repeating myself. This is a very common question here.[/edit]

if you don't have a compiler (to make .exe) go to http://www.bloodshed.net/dev/index.html download version 4, version 5 is a buggy beta. if you do dl ver.5, then update .exe using cvs at sourceforge.

As for books go, the best one is "The c++ programming language" by Bjarne Stroustup (the inventer of c++) is the best. Itis one of those books that from a beginner to Linus Torvalds (linux guy) and developpers use.

edit: the sites below all helped me in some way or another. First you should learn c programming, then move on to c++ and win32api and other api's.

http://www.cplusplus.com/doc/tutorial/ This site covers a lot! I learned a lot of Object Oriented Programming from here.

http://www.cplusplus.com/ref/ This is a handy site for beginners. This has examples and instructions for many standard library functions.

http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/ This is handy resource. Most of functions show prototypes and explenations for all of STL.

http://www.allegro.cc This has an easy to use complete game programming library. It's well evolved and used. It supports directx hardware accel through its functions.

http://www.sourceforge.net This is for those of you interrested in developping open source, giving feedback, bug reporting, latest builds, and complete code of some of your favorite apps... and much much more.

http://oopweb.com/CPP/Files/CPP.html This has a list of many tutorials and other resources.

http://www.msdn.microsoft.com A developer's ultimate resource.

http://www.winprog.org/tutorial The best site for learning windows programming. The guy set out to make it easy and quick. I think he certainly achieved his goal.

http://www.cprogramming.com/tutorial.html another c tutorial

http://www.research.att.com/~bs/homepage.html The inventors home page.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-193811
Share on other sites

  • 0

Learning C++ will be one of the best moves you ever make. However, before you dulge into this highly object powered, versitile and extremely complex language, it is important to understand the constituent language that powers it, you guessed it, C.

C, although tedeous and procedural, will provide you a basis on which to build further knowledge of the language. I started C when I was 12 and it was the first programming language I ever used. When I seriously started thinking about making the transition from C to C++, I was a little worried at the same position you are in now - however, I soon got over it.

There are some really good books you can find on both C and C++ - i;d suggest getting maybe 1 or 2 books on C and then focusing on C++. I have a book called C by example which is a great book for people who want a book that really explains stuff in a simplistic manner. There is no degree of complexity in the book though, which may become a problem when you start to want to explore a little further.

One of the best books I have read is The C++ Programming Language by Bjourne Stoustrap (the inventor and creator of C++). It is very complex though in the majority of the book and so I wouldnt recommend it to start of with.

In total, I have 6 books:

- C by example - Great for beginners in C

- Advanced C - More focused on the complex side of C

- C++ Primer Plus - Excellent book, teaches you the core of C++ but doesn't actually go into the VCL

- C++ Builder How-To - Ranges from Intermediate to Advanced in a question/answer format

- Sam's Teach yourself C++ Builder 3 in 21 days - good book for the basics of the VCL but assumes you have a knowledge of C++

- C++ Builder 4 Unleashed - very complex overall and is focused on COM server, MIDAS servers, database and the like.

If I were you, I would take around 2 to 3 months to familarise yourself with C, then move on to C++.

If you need any help, send me an e-mail or a personal message an i'll see what I can do.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-194277
Share on other sites

  • 0

At first, I didn't really though many people would reply, Thanks. First, I think I am going to get started with C then move on to C++ and maybe create my first program(thinking too far ahead). Oh yeah, I am also 13 and I figure this is the best time to learn since I am yuong and I will get materials better. Again, Thanks for everything.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-195205
Share on other sites

  • 0

No worries. Like I said though, if I were you I wouldn't take too much time on C - it's an older language now and is primarily used for DOS applications. You will find the transition between C and C++ easier though if you take the time to familiarise yourself with C. Are you going to use Borland's C and C++ languages or Microsoft's Visual C++ Language?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-201946
Share on other sites

  • 0

Vi3tboi911 if you don't mind spending a little cash to buy a intro book to C++ try "A Guide To Programming in C++" by Tim Corica, Beth Brown and Bruce Presley

Published by: Lawrenceville Press

When I started to learn C++ I used this book in school, a great book that will really get you going, very easy to learn from too.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-201955
Share on other sites

  • 0

It depends. VC++ 7 seems to have caught up on standards so I can't complain about that. ;) VC is great for programming anything ATL/COM or MFC. Builder is great, too. Its component architecture, VCL, is the best, and it is very easy to learn. Well, I thought it was easier than MFC or COM, but I'm sure there are others that prefer the MS way. BCB 6 has good standard support, as well. Their template library is also open source. http://www.stlport.org.

I'm sure you'll find that VC is the preferred tool in most workplaces. The only thing I really like about VC in total is the IDE. Although, with version 7, I'm finding less things to complain about... but it still doesn't support VCL! :p

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-256074
Share on other sites

  • 0

thanks for that. I bought a copy of BCB when I started to think about coding in C++ as I loved Delphi so much. From what I have seen though, I think I prefer VC. I suppose I just need to sit down with each one and spend some time with them. Its just awkward because I want to love BCB but we have VC at uni where I have to demo all my work etc so I really have to use that. Basically I think Ill be forced to get VC. I did aquire a copy of VS a while ago but it messed up my computer. I may try it again and hope.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-256206
Share on other sites

  • 0

LOL, that's the book they use in almost all the schools in toronto. My old school too!!!

Originally posted by DeathLace

Vi3tboi911 if you don't mind spending a little cash to buy a intro book to C++ try "A Guide To Programming in C++" by Tim Corica, Beth Brown and Bruce Presley

Published by: Lawrenceville Press

When I started to learn C++ I used this book in school, a great book that will really get you going, very easy to learn from too.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-257521
Share on other sites

  • 0

I?ve been programming since I was in 5th grade (yep I was like 11 or 12 when I started HTML). I learned HTML and all the things that went along with that (css, ssi, java script, xhtml, etc.), and then I started to learn perl, but abandoned that for PHP and MYSQL. After about 8 months with PHP I started to learn C++ and it was so easy for me. PHP taught me the basic syntax and all I had to do was learn the more advanced features. Also I highly recommend NOT learning C before C++, it'll just confuse you. So here's the order.

1) HTML and occupying languages (css, javascript (<-- just a little), etc.)

2)PHP and Mysql

3) C++

Don't jump into a high level language to quickley starts slow...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-384326
Share on other sites

  • 0

I started learning HTML and the components when I was 7, but i'm trying to learn PHP/Perl and C++ at the same time. Does learning PHP and Perl take a while to learn, or should I start C++ first? I got enough money for books and such. And I only need a few more bucks towards my iBook savings.

(i'm 12 right now)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-389646
Share on other sites

  • 0
Originally posted by DeathLace

Vi3tboi911 if you don't mind spending a little cash to buy a intro book to C++ try "A Guide To Programming in C++" by Tim Corica, Beth Brown and Bruce Presley

Published by: Lawrenceville Press

Does this book assume you will be using a Visual C++ program or doing everything in plain text? I was thinking it would be best for me to learn the language first before moving to a Visual program.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-423405
Share on other sites

  • 0

If you want a bit of advice don't do what I did.

When I was 16-17 I used to copy straight out of a C++ book and not learn all the concepts (some of it stuck with me). I was learning on my own time and never expected todo computer science in school. Now I really have to know all the concepts soundly. If you're going to learn any comp language for any useful purpose, get a good book which will teach you the concepts really well.

DrunkenMasters C++ Programmer's book of the month is:

(its a bit old ;) )

C++ Primer Plus by Steven Prata is my personal fave. Its one of the few complete programming books which really goes through the basics very clearly in plain language to start which is what you really need. Avoid the 24 hour or dummies books.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/22537-newbie-c-help/#findComment-451798
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!