Iran: Man sentenced to have eyes gouged out


Recommended Posts

Iran: Man sentenced to have eyes gouged out for teenage crime

Iran Focus

Tehran, Jun. 10 ? Iran?s State Supreme Court has upheld a sentence for a young man?s eyes to be gouged out and sprayed with acid, for blinding another man at the age of 16 some 12 years ago.

The defendant, only identified by his first name Vahid, was convicted of deliberately pouring acid on the face of another individual by the name of Gholam-Hossein while he worked as a labourer in Tehran when he was 16 years old, though he maintained throughout the trial that the attack was not intentional and that he had only meant to threaten the man because of an earlier scuffle. He said that the lid of the battery which the acid was in accidentally opened.

The phrase ?An eye for an eye? is very stringently adhered to in Iran?s Islamic law.

The original court ordered for acid to be sprayed on Vahid?s face as retribution for his actions, though his lawyer appealed the decision on the grounds that the rest of his face would also be damaged from the acid.

A second court rejected the appeal and instead ordered for Vahid?s eyes to be first gouged out by a ?qualified surgeon? and then sprayed with acid ?so as not to damage the face itself?.

The State Supreme Court has ruled for authorities to go ahead with carrying out the punishment, though Vahid?s lawyer is presently negotiating with Gholam-Hossein?s family to give clemency to his defendant. Vahid has been requested to pay 3 billion Rials ($300,000) as blood-money to forego the punishment however he has stated that he does not have such an amount of money.

Under Iranian law, boys above the age of fifteen are considered as adults and could be convicted of capital offences. Under increasing international pressure for violations of the rights of the child, the Iranian regime keeps convicted children in juvenile prisons and issues court verdicts only after they turn 18 so as to carry out sentences that would have be handed out if tGraphic photo link removed... Armecko link removed... Armeck

http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/arti...hp?storyid=2345Seriously, WTF? :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ouch, whenever we see some serial killer who raped kids or something, we always think we shouldnt put him in prison, we should do to him what he did to his victims, thing is when you actually see it done in practice like here, makes you think twice about the eye for an eye theory...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This kind of punishment and capital punishment is terrible. No one benefits from someone else dying and it doesn't change the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is barbaric. :x Inhumane.

It makes me glad we have the phrase:

[no law of Canada shall be construed or applied so as to ...] impose or authorize the imposition of cruel and unusual treatment or punishment;
link

-Ax

Edited by Axon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, the photos in the link are PRETTY sick.

I am all for tough punishments, but this is ridiculous.

I guess it cuts crime though. And in the view of the victim, it is more FAIRER than throwing the criminal in jail for a couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh well.. So much for doctors being sworn to "do no harm"..

That's one hippocratic oath down the toilet then... (Assuming their doctors actually take it, or an equivalent).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh well.. So much for doctors being sworn to "do no harm"..

That's one hippocratic oath down the toilet then...  (Assuming their doctors actually take it, or an equivalent).

586063540[/snapback]

I'm sure death penalty by injection in America is handled by a doctor.

And I'm sure many doctors pull the plug on purpose to end a suffering patient's life.

And abortion...

Heh. I guess its not the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure death penalty by injection in America is handled by a doctor.

And I'm sure many doctors pull the plug on purpose to end a suffering patient's life.

And abortion...

Heh.  I guess its not the same.

586067359[/snapback]

The death penalty is usually administered by some worker at the prison, and not often by a doctor. You should read US news a bit more often as this has been raised as an important issue recently...

When a Dr euthanises a patient, they only do it to end suffering where there is no chance of recovery...

Abortion is a completely different subject.

This is DELIBERATELY causing harm where there was no health problem before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure death penalty by injection in America is handled by a doctor.

And I'm sure many doctors pull the plug on purpose to end a suffering patient's life.

And abortion...

Heh.  I guess its not the same.

586067359[/snapback]

doctors do NOT administer the lethal injection. it is done by one of the officials who may or may not have the necessary medical background (i.e. proper way to inject, etc.). this is one of the reasons why the death penalty can be inhumane (notwithstanding the fact that it is already inhumane): the officials sometimes fail to do their job properly and the sentenced man will need multiple injections or die an otherwise painful death. one of the problems with lethal injection is that there are no external signs (and officials may not be trained to recognize them, unlike vets), so a man may not actually be dying, but suffering for an indefinite amount of time. there have been documented instances of men receiving the injection, fully conscious of their own dying body (which isn't supposed to happen).

abortion is still open-ended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hm.. guess I shouldn't have been eating cherry tomatos while glancing at the pics in the link. :laugh: :x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.