Compare the parallel port version only to a usb pen drive! Now which one fits in your pocket!
I agree the usb versions are perfect it.
Ok. The list is things that never went anywhere. If you go by you theory of comparing old technology with new technology, then we could add a billion more things to the list...
They had a perfectly good OS to sell the public (Win2k). ME wasn't even needed.
That was for business customers. Like Windows NT is.
Derizilla is right. I had ME before XP back in 2001 and never had any problems with it. It ran as good as 98. It's you users that make it fail. Infact I still have the disc (needed it for the upgrade of XP Pro).
Ok. The list is things that never went anywhere. If you go by you theory of comparing old technology with new technology, then we could add a billion more things to the list...
It's worth noting that Apple 'failures' like the Newton and Lisa were actually quite ahead of their time.
The Lisa cost $10000 at the time because it had 1MB of RAM and two floppy drives when most machines of it's era had less than 128KB and possibly no storage devices - at a time when memory cost a lot of money. The much lower cost Apple Macintosh had a single drive and 128KB.
Even tho back then a lot of drivers just didnt exist for Windows 2000...
For me Windows ME worked better than Windows 98 i guess it just depends on your hardware.
But once i upgraded from ME to XP after a week i wonderd how i ever used ME... XP just didnt not crash
agreed. I cant believe how i got through using ME day to day back then...