765 replies to this topic 7 votes

[Xero]

Carnage deserves his own, Morbius and Lizard would be nice for the 4th. Carnage for the 5th would be fantastic, maybe bring back Venom for that one as well. But it'd have to be much darker than the first 3. Carnage is a sick, twisted, psychotic freak. As much as I love the character I think he could only exist in his true form in the Nolan-verse.

[spacer]

NO! For God's sakes, did they not learn from the last one? Stop putting more than one villain in a single movie. Also, Morbius? Are you kidding me?

F*** this ticks me off.

[DrunknMunky]

spacer, on Jan 9 2009, 16:03, said:

NO! For God's sakes, did they not learn from the last one? Stop putting more than one villain in a single movie. Also, Morbius? Are you kidding me?

F*** this ticks me off.

QFT

[shakey]

Carnage will hopefully make it into his own movie, with maybe venom helping spider-man, since spider-man was never able to take out carnage alone...
But eh, i really could care less for any other story now with spider-man that doesnt have venom or carnage.

[Xero]

Multiple villains in 1 movie isn't a bad thing if done right. Dark Knight is a perfect example. The key is linking them together, instead of being completely separate. Spiderman 3 failed here big time. Another important piece would have the villains interact with each other. I'd love to see 2 bad guys duking it out.

[+Jamushroom]

Interesting decision about choosing Morbius as a villain, I like it. I hope they're going to make him as awesome as possible. Maybe like the Morbius from Ultimate Spiderman? Or the version from Legion Of Monsters: Morbius?

@Xero: That would be awesome if 2 villains would fight each other. They can pull it if by using 2 villains but they have to do it the right way. That means they should do it differently then how they did it in Spiderman 3.

Edited by Capric0rn, 09 January 2009 - 16:42.

[Rappy]

Exclusive Set Pic

[spacer]

Rappy, on Jan 9 2009, 14:15, said:

Exclusive Set Pic

<img snipped>

lol, Rappy.

[Xero]

Looks better than Spidey 3 already

[Trance.]

Lol, I think Spiderman series should learn something from the Batman series and learn to aim their movies at a, well rather older audience. Make the movie a bit darker and more mature then I'm pretty sure it would be a big hit. Although wrapping Spidey's comical character may be difficult.. it still would make it better than the previous three movies.

[BBWolf]

Am I really the only one on the planet who enjoyed SM3? Was I the only one to appreciate the philosophical depth? The self examination? Should that be introspection?

I know it's from a comic book but that is one of the oldest, most venerable comic books in its genre: I actually read it when I was a kid. Perhaps that is the problem, I grew old and I expect the whole thing to mature . . . . nah! I never matured so why would anyone?

I remember arguing with her as we left the cinema (she rubbished it like everyone else) and I am sure I said it was good to see at least one "Marvel/DC" movie franchise take a deeper line on characterisation 'cause that would probably ensure a little longevity for the series.

And NO (not if reboot means what I think it means).

[Pc_Madness]

Xero, on Jan 10 2009, 03:09, said:

Multiple villains in 1 movie isn't a bad thing if done right. Dark Knight is a perfect example.

Dark Knight would have been amazing with only one Villian (not counting those mob guys). I would love to get rid of those stupid scenes and see the Joker doing more crazy attacks. Two Face added nothing and him changing from good to evil made no sense.


As for Spiderman.. 2 and 3 were both pretty **** poor. :\

[Victor Rambo]

Spiderman 2 poor? I thought it was best in the series.

[Rappy]

Script is coming this summer!

Coming Soon said:

Sam Raimi told SCI FI Wire that David Lindsay-Abaire's script for Spider-Man 4 should be ready by summer.

Raimi said the film has to make the announced May 6, 2011 release date. "We have to make the release date, and on all of these pictures, the 'Spider-Man' films--and I'm sure it's the same as with many of the other bigger-budgeted films--they have release dates far in advance of a screenplay," he said. "So it's about getting it ready the best you can in time for the first day of production. That's what we've always done, and that's what we'll try to do again."

The helmer also told Empire magazine he will have full control over the fourth installment - something he didn't have on the third. "They really gave me a tremendous amount of control on the first two films, actually," he said. "But then there were different opinions on the third film and I didn't really have creative control, so to speak."

He added that "The best way for me to move forward on films, is that I've got to be the singular voice that makes the creative choices on the film. I love Spider-Man so much that I'd like to continue telling Spider-Man stories. But only under those circumstances where I think I can honour him."

[Rappy]

Sam Raimi Talks Spider-Man 4

Coming Soon said:

SCI FI Wire chatted with Spider-Man 4 director Sam Raimi, who said that he's meeting soon with Kirsten Dunst to talk about her reprising the role of Mary Jane Watson. "I think she would like to. But I don't want to speak on behalf of her," he said.

He was also asked if the recent darker and edgier superhero movies will influence the fourth installment. "I hope we don't react to these very good and sometimes bad superhero movies around us. I hope that we just [look] ever deeper into the truth of who Peter Parker really is—as a human being and the unique character, and that we celebrate that, which is a lot of the reason I want to make this next picture. I still believe I have an understanding of Peter Parker as the character that I have not quite put onto the screen yet," he said.