Opera 10.50 Beta 2 released


Recommended Posts

Opera's ad blocker works great, only issue is you have to manually block items or download a list to block things. There is a list somewhere out there thats basically the ad blocker list for Opera, but you have to manually update it, no auto-updates.

It's called urlfilter.ini in Opera. As for flashblock:

http://my.opera.com/Lex1/blog/flashblock-for-opera-9

Does Opera scroll too fast (in comparison to other browsers) for anyone else? This is the only thing stopping me from using Opera and I have to admit that it's a pretty decent browser and very fast!

Yes, but now I have become fine with it and it doesn't bother me so much anymore.

Beta 2 appears to have broken Opera Link syncing (it cleared my entire bookmark toolbar, and it never seems to sync right, anyway) and Appearance options are broken. (List boxes at the bottom of the dialog box don't do anything.)

Otherwise, seems to be a solid build.

You can also now remove the Opera button, top left of the browser. Not sure if earlier builds could do that.

This was possible with Beta 1. I always hide it, since you can access the menu bar just by pressing "Alt." No need for a large, ugly icon.

It really is the most complete web browser out there. I still prefer Firefox because I can customize it more, but they're really doing great.

There's still some things I wish Opera would adopt though... A real bookmarks toolbar, for one. The Personal bar is clunky, not letting me put it where I want it some of the time. I also wish Opera Link was a little more advanced... Everytime I sync, it always replaces my synced settings with old bookmarks I deleted long ago. They need to offer an option to delete what's on the browser already and replace it with what's on the server, etc.

The Mac version actually looks OK now. It feels more like a native application, but clearly it still isn't fully.

screenshot20100226at144.png

screenshot20100226at144.png

Too bad Safari is the only browser that has a picture perfect Aqua interface. I hate the fact all those other browser developers are trying to reinvent the wheel by creating custom interfaces and custom services (like spell-check) instead of using the native ones.

A few users have claimed beta 2 is slower in rendering pages, but benchmarks looks good. Haven't noticed anything myself.

Benchmarks show it slower than the snapshots before it, the snapshot released after the beta 2 was quicker though (and back in line with the previous snapshots)

Interesting results between Chrome 5.0.335.1 and Opera 10.5 Beta 2 on my Athlon64 3700+ system with 2GB RAM and Geforce 6600GT GPU. First, the overall results:

post-1798-12671943650494_thumb.jpg

But now the individual results:

post-1798-12671943916064_thumb.jpg post-1798-12671944064853_thumb.jpg

So, it appears that Opera renders faster, but Chrome processes the information more quickly, which probably results in the perceived speed difference on my system.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • There are so many of these apps now that do this, what do people recommend?
    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!