Scheduled PSN downtime tomorrow in Back Page News


32 replies to this topic * * * * * 1 votes

#1 revanmj

    Neowinian³

  • 297 posts
  • Joined: 29-August 06
  • Location: Poland

Posted 18 March 2010 - 17:29

Microsoft informed on a Windows 7 blog that they removed hardware virtualization support requirement from its Windows Virtual PC software. Of course if it is available, software will take advantage of the technology but it will be able to work without it. New version will be available to download later today.

Read more on Windows 7 blog.


#2 xpclient

    Have you tried Classic Shell? It has a million downloads!

  • 3,034 posts
  • Joined: 18-October 05
  • Location: Windows

Posted 18 March 2010 - 19:40

Absolutely delighted when I read this as I have some PCs that don't have hardware assisted virtualization but run Windows 7 just fine. Finally, they saw sense.

#3 Timan

    Fade Away...

  • 8,921 posts
  • Joined: 21-October 01
  • Location: Virginia, USA

Posted 18 March 2010 - 19:47

Nice, means I can finally run the thing on my Mac Pro. Believe the EFi stuff was messing it up.

#4 protocol7

    It's Fumbles. It was always Fumbles.

  • 2,065 posts
  • Joined: 06-May 09

Posted 18 March 2010 - 19:50

Nice! Seemed a strange requirement to add to a product as established as VPC at the last minute.

#5 Buendia

    Resident Fanatic

  • 502 posts
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 18 March 2010 - 19:54

Nice. I finally can try it :)

#6 carmatic

    oh cool i can change my member title

  • 5,961 posts
  • Joined: 03-July 04

Posted 18 March 2010 - 19:56

nice




now that hardware virtualization is no longer needed, what is the minimum requirements for xp mode? is it just the same as the editions of windows 7 with Aero enabled?



#7 azure.sapphire

    Resident Elite

  • 1,749 posts
  • Joined: 18-December 02
  • Location: Somewhere Midwest USA

Posted 18 March 2010 - 20:04

XP mode still requires virtualization, it is only the application (Virtual PC) that has reduce the requirement. As for a Mac, if you have a Mac Book Pro and Windows 7 Pro, you can run XP mode. A Google search should get some pretty good results. I think this is an ok guide:<br /><br /><a href='http://servergrrl.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!6A418D5155651D56!251.entry' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://servergrrl.sp...51D56!251.entry</a>

Sorry, main guide is here: (/edit)
http://servergrrl.sp...51D56!197.entry

#8 carmatic

    oh cool i can change my member title

  • 5,961 posts
  • Joined: 03-July 04

Posted 19 March 2010 - 01:40

View Postbluarash, on 18 March 2010 - 20:04, said:


Sorry, main guide is here: (/edit)
http://servergrrl.sp...51D56!197.entry
umm that's just installing windows 7 on a macbook pro... 

#9 nullie

    Resident Fanatic

  • 519 posts
  • Joined: 04-June 03
  • Location: Springfield, OR

Posted 19 March 2010 - 02:27

Does it support 64-bit Guest Operating systems yet?

#10 TokiToki

    Resident Fanatic

  • 707 posts
  • Joined: 19-July 07
  • Location: California

Posted 19 March 2010 - 02:36

View Postbluarash, on 18 March 2010 - 20:04, said:

XP mode still requires virtualization, it is only the application (Virtual PC) that has reduce the requirement.
You obviously didn't read.

Quote

Windows XP Mode will no longer require hardware virtualization technology to run.
in big fat bold print. :p

#11 Raa

    Resident English Nazi

  • 8,717 posts
  • Joined: 03-April 02
  • Location: NSW, Australia

Posted 19 March 2010 - 02:49

YES!!!!

This is brilliant news for a few of my customers, and probably for schools too!! (Y) (Y)

#12 boogerjones

    T.I.P.I

  • 3,445 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 04
  • Location: Chicago

Posted 19 March 2010 - 03:02

Good stuff. Hopefully XP Mode is a sign that Microsoft is developing an operating system that doesn't have to meet any compatibility requirements. It would simplify development drastically.

#13 kaffra

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,626 posts
  • Joined: 13-December 01
  • Location: Deutschland

Posted 19 March 2010 - 03:28

great news.

#14 marc2003

    Resident Fanatic

  • 504 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 04
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows ME

Posted 19 March 2010 - 04:38

why do people even use this? it absolutely sucks compared to the alternatives. vmware and virtualbox are far superior products.

#15 bolix

    Exordium

  • 981 posts
  • Joined: 06-February 04
  • Location: Dominican Republic

Posted 19 March 2010 - 04:51

View Postmarc2003, on 19 March 2010 - 04:38, said:

why do people even use this? it absolutely sucks compared to the alternatives. vmware and virtualbox are far superior products.
Hmm...it's free, it's integrated, don't have to buy licence of Windows XP?