Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Another controversial change for Ubuntu 10.04: File size policy


69 replies to this topic - - - - -

#31 XerXis

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,738 posts
  • Joined: 13-February 06
  • Location: Belgium

Posted 25 March 2010 - 17:09

View PostHawkMan, on 25 March 2010 - 17:07, said:

Unless you're from a country that actually use base 10 for their measurements, ie, not inches, feet, yards, stone, puntd and whatever, you are not allowed to complain about kilobytes being 1024 bytes. :p
you mean like every country in the world except the USA :p


#32 Anooxy

    iPhantom

  • 1,198 posts
  • Joined: 23-June 08
  • Location: Albania
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Nokia 500

Posted 25 March 2010 - 17:12

View PostXerXis, on 25 March 2010 - 17:06, said:

while dividing by a power of 2 is a bitshift operation and dividing by a power of 10 is not (yes i've programmed both RISC and CISC processors), and thus you are right about speed. Do you really think that expressing file size according to standards will have an impact on your computer performance?

Obviously not, I'm just explaining that what we've used as 1KiB = 1024 Bit is correct and not wrong.

#33 megamanXplosion

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,192 posts
  • Joined: 05-April 04
  • Location: Kentucky, USA

Posted 25 March 2010 - 17:13

HawkMan, what about us crazy Americans who want to see our country switch to a decimalized system of measurement? Can we complain or not? =P

#34 bogas04

    This title is bogus

  • 2,686 posts
  • Joined: 15-May 09
  • Location: India
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: Lumia 920

Posted 25 March 2010 - 17:16

To me its not grey , its not metal , its purple , so its not copied
:D

#35 TRC

    Neowinian UNSTOPPABLE

  • 6,177 posts
  • Joined: 08-August 05
  • Location: USA

Posted 25 March 2010 - 17:24

View PostXerXis, on 25 March 2010 - 17:09, said:

you mean like every country in the world except the USA :p

Stone is used in the UK, but yeah. They tried to switch us over in the 70s and we told them to go jump off a cliff.

#36 tiagosilva29

    If you're in trouble PM me

  • 11,890 posts
  • Joined: 08-May 04

Posted 25 March 2010 - 17:29

View PostXerXis, on 25 March 2010 - 17:09, said:

you mean like every country in the world except the USA :p
Liberia and Burma too.

Everything should be represented in bits! **** kilobytes and kibibytes!

#37 HawkMan

    Badass Viking

  • 16,557 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway

Posted 25 March 2010 - 17:31

View PostmegamanXplosion, on 25 March 2010 - 17:13, said:

HawkMan, what about us crazy Americans who want to see our country switch to a decimalized system of measurement? Can we complain or not? =P

Not untill you do something about it, no :p

#38 vetGrowled

    Resident Rockstar

  • 36,016 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 25 March 2010 - 17:33

View PostXenon, on 25 March 2010 - 17:08, said:

Doesn't it seem that Ubuntu is getting a bad case of OS X envy?
Big time. I guess if you're going to copy, copy from the best. ;)

#39 vetthe evn show

    Banned.

  • 5,182 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 02
  • Location: Calgary AB

Posted 25 March 2010 - 22:01

View Postroadwarrior, on 25 March 2010 - 17:04, said:

The IEC resolution that defined that was only passed in 1999. Those of us who have been using computers since the early 80's (or longer) know better.
kilo is taken from the metric system which has it's origins around 400 years ago. The prefix 'kilo' itself derives form a similar-sounding greek word meaning thousand.

#40 Kirkburn

    Mmm, delicious sanity.

  • 6,684 posts
  • Joined: 03-April 06
  • Location: Bristol, UK

Posted 25 March 2010 - 23:48

Y'know, it's hardly an earth shattering change.

It's not preventing the 1,024 method of calculation from existing, just correcting the terminology used ... and it's a change that's long overdue. Just because it's "always been wrong" doesn't mean it has to stay that way.

#41 +M2Ys4U

    Your friendly neighbourhood Pirate!

  • 7,997 posts
  • Joined: 02-June 04
  • Location: England, UK, Europe

Posted 26 March 2010 - 02:17

View PostKirkburn, on 25 March 2010 - 23:48, said:

Y'know, it's hardly an earth shattering change.

It's not preventing the 1,024 method of calculation from existing, just correcting the terminology used ... and it's a change that's long overdue. Just because it's "always been wrong" doesn't mean it has to stay that way.
(Y)

Good for Ubuntu (and I don't say that often :p)

#42 Udedenkz

    /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\

  • 3,305 posts
  • Joined: 28-October 07
  • Location: Internet

Posted 26 March 2010 - 02:25

This is the wrong place where 'dumbing-down' of Ubuntu needs to happen (in order to increase user-friendliness). :no:

Edited by Udedenkz, 26 March 2010 - 02:25.


#43 vetGrowled

    Resident Rockstar

  • 36,016 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 26 March 2010 - 02:53

I doubt if most users will either know or care about this.

#44 vetAndrew Lyle

    Don't Panic!

  • 31,864 posts
  • Joined: 15-December 03
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario
  • OS: Windows 7 SP1

Posted 26 March 2010 - 05:00

Why change something after so many years? People need to learn computers work on the base2 structure and not base10.

#45 vetmarkjensen

    Linux noob since Red Hat 5.1

  • 24,481 posts
  • Joined: 02-October 03
  • Location: Middle Tennessee

Posted 26 March 2010 - 12:06

View PostAndrew Lyle, on 26 March 2010 - 05:00, said:

Why change something after so many years? People need to learn computers work on the base2 structure and not base10.
Do average users really need to know that? In order to send emails, use Facebook and what-not?