YouTube to increase upload limit from 10 to 15 minutes


Recommended Posts

Sources at YouTube tell us that online video giant will soon increase the maximum duration of uploaded video clips from 10 minutes to 15 minutes. The move may not mean much to some, but if you're a YouTube uploader, the increase would mean significantly less chopped-up installments of longer form works, and subtly redefine the medium, given that YouTube is the largest video hosting service online.

YouTube Partners (online video companies like us and other content owners who have agreements with the company involving shared ad revenue) are already able to upload videos longer than 10 minutes, but it's a fairly big deal for the rest of the ecosystem? and amateur folk make up a huge portion of that ecosystem.

Just think about it: the move would bring 50% more "haul videos," from shopaholic teen girls; 50% more crazytime rants from random dudes; 50% more hamster montages; and 50% more double (whoah that's almost a triple) rainbows.

Why now? I don't know. Why not? But I'd put my money partially on the company's recent win in the Viacom case, and a sense that they've now figured out more effectively how to help the big content owners (labels, movie studios, TV networks) identify infringing uploads, which might tend to fall largely in that longer-form category.

We're hearing something about a "15 minutes of fame" contest to celebrate the expanded video duration, in which winning uploads will be featured on the YouTube homepage in a future spotlight.

Source: http://www.boingboing.net/2010/07/29/youtube-to-increase.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+boingboing/iBag+(Boing+Boing)

Yeah, increase overall bandwidth usage when you can barely watch a YouTube clip without pausing it for 10 minutes first.

*Waits for the usual OMG WORKS FOR ME, UR CONNECTION!111*

It's starting to become a pretty widespread issue, especially among my friends and relatives who frequently use YouTube.

Don't really see it impacting the bandwidth any more than it currently get's hit.

People with videos over 10 minutes just now just break them into parts.

Yeah, increase overall bandwidth usage when you can barely watch a YouTube clip without pausing it for 10 minutes first.

*Waits for the usual OMG WORKS FOR ME, UR CONNECTION!111*

It's starting to become a pretty widespread issue, especially among my friends and relatives who frequently use YouTube.

Here I am on a crappy 768Kb/s (thats a max of ~90KB/s down) and I only ever have to pause and let YouTube videos buffer when I have other things sucking down bandwidth. But, I do live in an area that has very low usage compared to most other areas (very small town).

That being said, glad to see them increase the time limit. Will be able to watch longer gameplay demos and what not on YouTube without having to go to other sites to get the same thing not cut into pieces.

Don't really see it impacting the bandwidth any more than it currently get's hit.

People with videos over 10 minutes just now just break them into parts.

And what about the thousands if not millions of people that used to make their video blogs, game movies, gameplay footage whatever 10 minutes long

to stick 'em on YouTube, they can now up it to 15 thus requiring more bandwidth to serve when watching and the overall bandwidth usage is increased.

YouTube uses a TON of bandwidth, it uses as much bandwidth as the entire internet did in 2000 - So something like this is drastic.

Here I am on a crappy 768Kb/s (thats a max of ~90KB/s down) and I only ever have to pause and let YouTube videos buffer when I have other things sucking down bandwidth. But, I do live in an area that has very low usage compared to most other areas (very small town).

That being said, glad to see them increase the time limit. Will be able to watch longer gameplay demos and what not on YouTube without having to go to other sites to get the same thing not cut into pieces.

I'm on a 15Mbit that is always at max speed, the problem isn't on my end, it's on YouTube's end, serving the videos.

And what about the thousands if not millions of people that used to make their video blogs, game movies, gameplay footage whatever 10 minutes long

to stick 'em on YouTube, they can now up it to 15 thus requiring more bandwidth to serve when watching and the overall bandwidth usage is increased.

YouTube uses a TON of bandwidth, it uses as much bandwidth as the entire internet did in 2000 - So something like this is drastic.

I suppose, but the sites just ****ed for speed anyway, so slow half the time laugh.gif

This is friggin awesome, I hate when I need to do a video and all I need is a couple of extra minutes. I understand why they original capped it at 10 minutes but it is stupid given that piraters can easily chop up a video then upload it.

Yeah, increase overall bandwidth usage when you can barely watch a YouTube clip without pausing it for 10 minutes first.

*Waits for the usual OMG WORKS FOR ME, UR CONNECTION!111*

It's starting to become a pretty widespread issue, especially among my friends and relatives who frequently use YouTube.

I notice that too, videos load really slowly sometimes. No where near my connection speed limit.

OK, how exactly is this going to make any difference in overall bandwidth consumption? Say someone wants to upload a 30 minute video. Right now, they would have to split it into 3 pieces. After the change, they would have to split it in two pieces. The overall amount of space used is basically the same.

You Tube is extending videos up to 15 Minutes. I think it's a good idea. Because lets say you want to watch

a excerise video for instants you can wath the full video with out interupchions. But on the other side you don't want to use up all the download

because there's only so much you can do.

OK, how exactly is this going to make any difference in overall bandwidth consumption? Say someone wants to upload a 30 minute video. Right now, they would have to split it into 3 pieces. After the change, they would have to split it in two pieces. The overall amount of space used is basically the same.

Because surprisingly, a lot of video blogs, footage of games, uploaded speeches whatever sometimes exceed 10 minutes but people don't turn them into several parts, they just edit and cut it down to 10 minutes. A lot of content

is edited down to 10 minutes because people don't want to watch a 2,3 or 4 parter video usually. So now, they don't have to cut those extra minutes away and the servers will have to feed a longer video file to thousands if not millions of users

on the general scale ... And that's a huge difference in bandwidth consumption.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
    • It's listed #399.99 on Amazon, per your link. It's not $299.99.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      263
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      59
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!