Scheduled PSN downtime tomorrow in Back Page News


31 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 techbeck

    bazinga!

  • 9,161 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 06 August 2010 - 17:08

Quote

Features in the four major browsers designed to cloak users' browser history often don't work as billed, according to a research paper that warns that users may get a false sense of security when using the built-in privacy settings.

The private-browsing modes are supposed to allow users to visit a website without leaving any trace on their computers, and yet Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, and Safari frequently leave tracks, according to the research, which is scheduled to be presented at next week's Usenix Security Symposium in Washington DC. The makers of those browsers — Microsoft, Mozilla, Google, and Apple respectively — often hail the offerings as a way to enhance privacy when using shared computers.

One failure that affects IE, Firefox, and Safari happens when users save SSL, or secure sockets layer, client certificates while browsing in private mode. The browsers store a record of those actions in a file that allows anyone who has physical access to know exactly what site the user was visiting at the time. Similarly, when IE and Safari encounter a self-signed certificate, it is stored in a certificate vault that is preserved even after the private session ends.

Similarly, Firefox users who make security certificate settings while in private mode will have a partial copy of their browsing history stored in a file called cert8.db, the researchers said.

“We discovered that all these browsers retain the generated key pair even after private browsing ends,” the researchers wrote. “Again, if the user visits a site that generates an SSL client key pair, the resulting keys will leak the site's identity to the local attacker.”

The study (PDF here) showed each browser failing in specific settings.

The privacy mode in Firefox, for instance, is undermined when a user sets site-specific preferences or uses a variety of Mozilla-sanctioned plug-ins. The open-source browser also stores websites visited that dole out custom protocol handlers based on the HTML5 standard.

For its part, IE's InPrivate mode can be undermined when websites make SMB queries, since the Microsoft browser shares large chunks of code with Windows Explorer.

The researchers also devised a way for webmasters to detect when someone visiting their sites is using the privacy mode. It involves placing an iframe with a unique web address and then “using JavaScript to check whether a link to that URL was displayed as purple (visited) or blue (unvisited).”

The researchers said that to the best of their knowledge they are the first to demonstrate a way to detect private browsing mode — but that may not really matter for much longer. The technique appears to use the decade-old browser history attack, which was recently fixed in Safari and will soon be fixed in Firefox. It's only a matter of time before Microsoft and Google follow suit.

Using the technique, they confirmed what we all suspected: the feature is mainly used when surfing to porn sites. Gift and news sites, not so much. ®

http://www.theregist...g_mode_failure/


#2 The_Decryptor

    (づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ

  • 17,676 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 02
  • Location: Sol System
  • OS: WinLin X 10.7 Ill-tempered Badger

Posted 06 August 2010 - 17:15

I think people put too much trust in these modes, but at the same time I think the browser makers hype it up a bit.

That being said, these would be flaws that should be fixed.

Quote

...
The technique appears to use the decade-old browser history attack, which was recently fixed in Safari and will soon be fixed in Firefox.
...
Uh, Mozilla came up and implemented it first, Apple was second.

#3 hdood

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 5,660 posts
  • Joined: 25-February 04

Posted 06 August 2010 - 17:22

What happens to Flash when you run it in private mode? I mean, it has its own private caches and cookies.

#4 The_Decryptor

    (づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ

  • 17,676 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 02
  • Location: Sol System
  • OS: WinLin X 10.7 Ill-tempered Badger

Posted 06 August 2010 - 17:26

Current versions of Flash respect the private browsing modes (it can query the current mode and get notified of changes), so if there is any information leakage it's Adobe's fault, not the browsers.

#5 bjoswald

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,358 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 08
  • Location: Florida
  • OS: Windows 7 Home Premium x64
  • Phone: HTC Aria, CyanogenMod 7

Posted 07 August 2010 - 01:10

Well, porn is a multi-billion-dollar business for a reason. But even so, people can't afford to lose the jobs they have over it. Thus, "porn mode" was born.

#6 techbeck

    bazinga!

  • 9,161 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 07 August 2010 - 01:26

View PostEducated Idiot, on 07 August 2010 - 01:10, said:

Well, porn is a multi-billion-dollar business for a reason. But even so, people can't afford to lose the jobs they have over it. Thus, "porn mode" was born.

Porn mode was born because porn is a really booming internet business...and people cannot control their urges. If people feel the need to wack it all the time, they have problems. Friend of mine, her EX had porn on every laptop and mobile device he had....and thats not even the half of it.

But anyway, at work I dont even bother trying to mask where I am going to because I respect the rules.

#7 vetGrowled

    Resident know-it-all

  • 25,722 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 07 August 2010 - 03:41

I'm not surprised. I've always have been a bit dubious of private mode.

#8 MR_Candyman

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 12,761 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 03

Posted 07 August 2010 - 04:50

Opera FTW!

#9 Tech Star

    Ron Paul 2012

  • 10,455 posts
  • Joined: 24-November 04
  • Location: California, USA

Posted 07 August 2010 - 05:06

View PostThe_Decryptor, on 06 August 2010 - 17:15, said:

Uh, Mozilla came up and implemented it first, Apple was second.

It was saying that Apple got the issue fixed and that Mozilla is going to fix it soon. It didn't say who implemented it first or second. :pinch:

#10 nullie

    Resident Fanatic

  • 519 posts
  • Joined: 04-June 03
  • Location: Springfield, OR

Posted 07 August 2010 - 09:53

View PostMR_Candyman, on 07 August 2010 - 04:50, said:

Opera FTW!
My thought was 'why didn't they mention the fifth major browser' - I wonder if it's the only one that actually works?

#11 Ominous

    Residential Idiot

  • 866 posts
  • Joined: 08-May 09
  • Location: Philippines
  • OS: Windows 7

Posted 07 August 2010 - 09:56

Probably they don't think Opera is a major browser. Hope not. :(

#12 Colin-uk

    Neowinian Super Star

  • 22,128 posts
  • Joined: 25-February 04
  • Location: Wirral, UK

Posted 07 August 2010 - 10:00

I've never bothered to use those modes tbh, I guess a better private browsing mode would be running a browser normally in a sandbox, then deleting the sandbox when you close the browser.

#13 tiagosilva29

    Sith

  • 11,012 posts
  • Joined: 08-May 04

Posted 07 August 2010 - 10:12

View PostColin-uk, on 07 August 2010 - 10:00, said:

I've never bothered to use those modes tbh

Posted Image

That's because you never bothered to upgrade from IE6.

#14 +DonC

    Resident Fanatic

  • 587 posts
  • Joined: 16-August 07
  • Location: England

Posted 07 August 2010 - 10:13

View PostColin-uk, on 07 August 2010 - 10:00, said:

I've never bothered to use those modes tbh, I guess a better private browsing mode would be running a browser normally in a sandbox, then deleting the sandbox when you close the browser.
You do know that there's a market for VMware vulnerabilities too. I can only imagine that VirtualBox, Virtual PC and the OSX ones are would be similar.

But I agree - I never use these modes since I've never really believed that they can self contain whatever happens. I wonder if these modes lead people to believe that they're protected from malware, tbh.

#15 Colin-uk

    Neowinian Super Star

  • 22,128 posts
  • Joined: 25-February 04
  • Location: Wirral, UK

Posted 07 August 2010 - 10:15

View Posttiagosilva29, on 07 August 2010 - 10:12, said:

Posted Image

That's because you never bothered to upgrade from IE6.

I dont need to, I dont use private browsing anyway.

Quote

You do know that there's a market for VMware vulnerabilities too. I can only imagine that VirtualBox, Virtual PC and the OSX ones are would be similar.

I meant something like sandboxie, but I guess there are vulnerabilities there too.