Scheduled PSN downtime tomorrow in Back Page News


45 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 Quattrone

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,020 posts
  • Joined: 28-April 10
  • Location: Philadelphia, PA

Posted 13 August 2010 - 01:39

In a clash of two Silicon Valley titans, Oracle said Thursday that it has filed a federal copyright lawsuit alleging that Google's popular Android operating system was built on Oracle's Java software without permission.
Android, which was first released in late 2008, is used by several computer manufacturers as the operating system that runs smartphones and other computing devices. Oracle's lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for Northern California, accuses Google of infringing on patents and copyrights that Oracle acquired when it bought Sun Microsystems earlier this year.
Google had no immediate comment.
But one analyst called the lawsuit surprising because Sun, whose engineers developed Java, decided several years ago to release key elements of the widely used programming language under an open-source license which allows others to use it freely.
"Java is essential for Android," said Al Hilwa, a software expert at the IDC research firm. "But a big chunk of Java is open-source. Since Android has been out there for more than a year, most people would have expected they were in compliance with whatever license terms apply."
Android's growth in the first half of 2010 has been enormous, with Google CEO Eric Schmidt saying last week that more than 200,000 smartphones powered by Google's mobile operating system are being activated around the world each day. Gartner, a prominent research firm, said Thursday that Android is
now the most popular smartphone operating system in the United States, and is on the verge of becoming the second most popular in the world, closing in on Research In Motion's Blackberry.
All four major U.S. wireless carriers now offer smartphones powered by Android,.
While just 1.8 percent of the world's smartphones were running Android in the second quarter of 2009, Android now has 17.2 percent of the worldwide smartphone share, or 10.6 million phones, just behind RIM's 18.2 percent and 11.2 million phones, according to the Gartner report. Nokia's Symbian remains the world most popular smartphone operating system at 41.2 percent of the global market, but both Android and Apple's iPhone are rapidly eating into the market share of Nokia, RIM and Microsoft Windows Mobile phones.
Android's growth means more search revenue for Google, as consumers use their smartphones to search the web. Google does not break out its revenue from mobile search, but Google searches from Android devices grew by 300 percent during the first half of 2010, Jonathan Rosenberg, a Google senior vice president, recently told analysts.
The first Android phone, the T-Moble G1, went on sale in October 2008, and Android phones are now available in about 50 different countries.

Source


#2 nub

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,227 posts
  • Joined: 19-November 06
  • Location: Amerika

Posted 13 August 2010 - 01:44

Ahhh my eyes

#3 spartyjohnson

    I'm Spartacus

  • 573 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 03
  • Location: Proud to be American

Posted 13 August 2010 - 01:50

Anybody not see this coming? Many people predicted Oracle would run Java and other free technologies from Sun.

#4 .Neo

    Generic User

  • 13,852 posts
  • Joined: 14-September 05
  • Location: Amsterdam, NL
  • OS: OS X Lion, iOS 5
  • Phone: BB Torch 9860

Posted 13 August 2010 - 01:56

Good for them! :laugh:

#5 Phenom II

    Neowin Junkie

  • 4,808 posts
  • Joined: 19-October 06
  • Location: , Location, Location

Posted 13 August 2010 - 02:12

I like to read from Post 2 onwards to get the jist of what the main post says when it is too long and painful :laugh:

#6 primexx

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 11,483 posts
  • Joined: 24-April 05

Posted 13 August 2010 - 02:12

damnit oracle

#7 vetGrowled

    Resident know-it-all

  • 25,722 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 13 August 2010 - 03:40

Quote

But one analyst called the lawsuit surprising because Sun, whose engineers developed Java, decided several years ago to release key elements of the widely used programming language under an open-source license which allows others to use it freely.
I guess now Oracle is planning to take it back?

#8 +warwagon

    Only you can prevent forest fires.

  • 18,382 posts
  • Joined: 30-November 01
  • Location: Iowa

Posted 13 August 2010 - 04:14

Oh blah. If Android had flopped, Oracle wouldn't have given a ****. But now that it's successful Oricle wants in on the action.

#9 nullie

    Resident Fanatic

  • 519 posts
  • Joined: 04-June 03
  • Location: Springfield, OR

Posted 13 August 2010 - 04:24

Shame on Oracle.

#10 techbeck

    bazinga!

  • 9,161 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 13 August 2010 - 14:03

View Postwarwagon, on 13 August 2010 - 04:14, said:

Oh blah. If Android had flopped, Oracle wouldn't have given a ****. But how that's successful they want in on the action.

Exactly...and how much do you even here about Oracle anymore? Seems to me Oracle just wants to be "heard"

#11 monkey13

    Resident Elite

  • 1,481 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03

Posted 13 August 2010 - 14:14

View Posttechbeck, on 13 August 2010 - 14:03, said:

Exactly...and how much do you even here about Oracle anymore? Seems to me Oracle just wants to be "heard"

Oracle are still doing well. All the key factors for them (revenue, equity, etc) are up.

Why Android? What is special about the Java implementation in it that warrants a lawsuit and why are other smartphones that have Java OK?

Also Google don't make money from Android. It's open source as well.

#12 HawkMan

    Badass Viking

  • 12,503 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway

Posted 13 August 2010 - 14:23

So I suppose everyone who now opposes this action where Google/android uses a non standard Java VM(it's not even a true VM) Also thought Sun where total a-holes when they sued MS for the MS Java WM ?

otherwise it'd be a bit hypocritical, since this violation of the Java TOS is significantly worse than the MS one.

#13 hdood

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 5,660 posts
  • Joined: 25-February 04

Posted 13 August 2010 - 14:24

View Postmonkey13, on 13 August 2010 - 14:14, said:

Why Android? What is special about the Java implementation in it that warrants a lawsuit and why are other smartphones that have Java OK?
I suppose the difference is that others support actual (Oracle) Java platforms like J2ME. Android does not. Android does not implement any standard Java platform, and is not even capable of running Java bytecode.

It's essentially a custom platform that just happens to use the Java programming language (with support for some standard Java libraries.) Software written for Oracle's Java platforms can't run on Android, and vice versa. They are incompatible, both in source code and executable form.

View Postmonkey13, on 13 August 2010 - 14:14, said:

Also Google don't make money from Android. It's open source as well.
Google makes plenty of money from it. Profit is the sole reason Android exists.

#14 HawkMan

    Badass Viking

  • 12,503 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway

Posted 13 August 2010 - 14:27

View Postmonkey13, on 13 August 2010 - 14:14, said:

Why Android? What is special about the Java implementation in it that warrants a lawsuit and why are other smartphones that have Java OK?

Also Google don't make money from Android. It's open source as well.

Because android doesn't run Java apps. It turns dex files, in dalvik. dalvik is a special java "runtime" that runs the pre compiled dex files on Android and doesn't support the full java spec. it's written specifically for Android and uses the java language for the code, but doesn't run java apps. hence it doesn't follow the rules you agree to when using the java language or writing a java interpreter as they're supposed to be fully cross platform and support all the java language.

Google should have done the right thing and just made dalvik use their own special language instead of java and they'd be safe. But as usual google just plows ahead ignoring other peoples copyrights and hard work.

#15 Euphoria

    --- eüphorïå ---

  • 2,190 posts
  • Joined: 10-December 01
  • Location: Republic of Macedonia

Posted 13 August 2010 - 14:30

View Posttechbeck, on 13 August 2010 - 14:03, said:

Exactly...and how much do you even here about Oracle anymore? Seems to me Oracle just wants to be "heard"
Oracle is doing quite fine.
They have every right to ask for retribution, knowing that Schmidt has used their source code for Android.






Similar Topics Collapse