Recommended Posts

My impressions:

  • iTunes 10 feels snappier™ on OS X.
  • Monochrome sidebar icons are growing on me.
  • Dock icon: It's not bad. Can live with it.
  • WTF were they thinking with the position of the 'traffic lights?'
  • Tried Ping, didn't really see the point of it yet.
  • Neat trick in the OS X version: If you have the album art showing in the sidebar, double-click it and see what happens.
  • New volume slider etc a hint at the design of future OS X UIs?

All in all a solid upgrade.

I love this! Thanks for the tip!

Anyone here with ~30,000 tracks tried iTunes 10 yet? Is it faster than previous versions?

i have about 15000 and it's it loaded the library pretty quickly (you know how it updates the libary after each itunes update? it did it hella quick this time)

post-81190-12834517912723.jpg

Anybody knows how to remove those hideous arrows, I failed to do so since v9. I remember this is something about iTunes Store I could disable them before but since v9 and now in v10 they just wont go. :pinch:

It seems they automatically appear now only when a song title is highlighted, and there's no way to get rid of them or change where they link to (the iTunes Store) like in earlier versions.

Big problem with iTunes 10

When an album is playing in the background and I am in grid view, and I am about to get album art work for an album which is bottom of the list. If next track starts playing, my list looses focus and takes me back to the album which is playing. So I have to again scroll down to go to the desired album to change the album art.

Frustrating problem.

While I was (as a Windows user) fairly okay with the previous versions this one is the worst version of iTunes ever released.

They introduced a lot of things that I don't link at all.

- The album art column is not re-sizable. Okay you can set the artwork on large, which means basically mean post stamp size. I usually made the first column quite big so I could watch my high resolution album art. Now all my art are small icons and my library has become a bit lifeless

- Grey, grey, grey. When XP came out with there blue tele-tubby taskbar and wallpaper the Apple software looked stylish and professional. Now with Windows 7 the OS finally starts looking cool with all the glass effects. Instead of making the new interface fit in with windows; Apple decided to suck all of the color out of iTunes. Everything is so bland and boring...

- The new icon. Don't like it, hoped for something more creative but it doesn't bother me while using it

- The volume slider is almost as big as the search box. Very strange...

- While you can disable and hide homeshare and genius, you can't disable ping...unless you want to disable the whole iTunes store; a thing I do not want to do...

For the user who complained of the arrows that link to the store; you can disable them. I did that in iTunes 9 and it still seems to work cause after upgrading I still don't have any arrows. Check here for Windows users: http://ocram.org/wiki/FAQs/iTunes

- The album art column is not re-sizable. Okay you can set the artwork on large, which means basically mean post stamp size. I usually made the first column quite big so I could watch my high resolution album art. Now all my art are small icons and my library has become a bit lifeless

I totally agree with this! I really hate this new look for album arts. :/

Don't forget to let Apple know. Many users on the apple forums are doing this too cause sometimes this seems to work: http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html

iTunes 10 isn't on there yet, so it's difficult to report.

I don't know about this whole faster on Windows thing..

I have a C2D 2.4Ghz and a C2Q 2.8Ghz and it's sluggish on both.. Just hitting play/pause takes a second or two to respond and it uses a massive amount of CPU..

It sucks because I love iTunes :( I just want it to be nice and fast too..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!