Recommended Posts

My impressions:

  • iTunes 10 feels snappier™ on OS X.
  • Monochrome sidebar icons are growing on me.
  • Dock icon: It's not bad. Can live with it.
  • WTF were they thinking with the position of the 'traffic lights?'
  • Tried Ping, didn't really see the point of it yet.
  • Neat trick in the OS X version: If you have the album art showing in the sidebar, double-click it and see what happens.
  • New volume slider etc a hint at the design of future OS X UIs?

All in all a solid upgrade.

I love this! Thanks for the tip!

Anyone here with ~30,000 tracks tried iTunes 10 yet? Is it faster than previous versions?

i have about 15000 and it's it loaded the library pretty quickly (you know how it updates the libary after each itunes update? it did it hella quick this time)

post-81190-12834517912723.jpg

Anybody knows how to remove those hideous arrows, I failed to do so since v9. I remember this is something about iTunes Store I could disable them before but since v9 and now in v10 they just wont go. :pinch:

It seems they automatically appear now only when a song title is highlighted, and there's no way to get rid of them or change where they link to (the iTunes Store) like in earlier versions.

Big problem with iTunes 10

When an album is playing in the background and I am in grid view, and I am about to get album art work for an album which is bottom of the list. If next track starts playing, my list looses focus and takes me back to the album which is playing. So I have to again scroll down to go to the desired album to change the album art.

Frustrating problem.

While I was (as a Windows user) fairly okay with the previous versions this one is the worst version of iTunes ever released.

They introduced a lot of things that I don't link at all.

- The album art column is not re-sizable. Okay you can set the artwork on large, which means basically mean post stamp size. I usually made the first column quite big so I could watch my high resolution album art. Now all my art are small icons and my library has become a bit lifeless

- Grey, grey, grey. When XP came out with there blue tele-tubby taskbar and wallpaper the Apple software looked stylish and professional. Now with Windows 7 the OS finally starts looking cool with all the glass effects. Instead of making the new interface fit in with windows; Apple decided to suck all of the color out of iTunes. Everything is so bland and boring...

- The new icon. Don't like it, hoped for something more creative but it doesn't bother me while using it

- The volume slider is almost as big as the search box. Very strange...

- While you can disable and hide homeshare and genius, you can't disable ping...unless you want to disable the whole iTunes store; a thing I do not want to do...

For the user who complained of the arrows that link to the store; you can disable them. I did that in iTunes 9 and it still seems to work cause after upgrading I still don't have any arrows. Check here for Windows users: http://ocram.org/wiki/FAQs/iTunes

- The album art column is not re-sizable. Okay you can set the artwork on large, which means basically mean post stamp size. I usually made the first column quite big so I could watch my high resolution album art. Now all my art are small icons and my library has become a bit lifeless

I totally agree with this! I really hate this new look for album arts. :/

Don't forget to let Apple know. Many users on the apple forums are doing this too cause sometimes this seems to work: http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html

iTunes 10 isn't on there yet, so it's difficult to report.

I don't know about this whole faster on Windows thing..

I have a C2D 2.4Ghz and a C2Q 2.8Ghz and it's sluggish on both.. Just hitting play/pause takes a second or two to respond and it uses a massive amount of CPU..

It sucks because I love iTunes :( I just want it to be nice and fast too..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!