Good Bye AT&T DSL, Hello DOCSIS 3.0 Fiber !


Recommended Posts

I think this still falls into the HW category...kinda

Today I had the pleasure of canceling my DSL Elite account with AT&T as my new Time Warner Fiber Optic Wideband went active.

With AT&T i maxed @ 5.2 Mbps - the fastest DSL they have.

Now with the fiber going all the way to my house -- well have a look for yourself

:D

This is a peak of course, but sustained speeds are @ 90Mbps +, only 5Mbps upstream - so my idea of hosting thousands of torrents wont work.

My brand new Linksys E3000 w/ DD-WRT is now obsolete - now its just a matter of doing some tweaking.

If anyone knows some good hacks for the Motorola Surfboard DOCSIS 3.0 modem, I'd appreciate it.

Wow kickass man. How much are you paying?

$100 / mo.

Nice speeds, but the ping time leaves a lot to be desired.

I know, I'm working on that as we speak.

Also seeing if I can change the router DNS over to OpenDNS' servers.

Currently I just have OpenDNS settings in my Local Connection settings.

Any ideas/tips ?

Or is this something Im stuck with ? I want to avoid calling Time Warner tech support, in the past when Ive had to call tech support for a customer - I hate it and it makes me want to commit multiple murders !

The $100 / month is just for internet, I have TV thru Dish Network, and dont have a land-line.

Since I was paying $40/mo for 6.0Mbps DSL - its a bargain.

Ive fixed the bad pings and more speedtests put it @ about 200Mbps. :D

I broke down and called their "tech support" - almost comical.

I seriously think my dog knows more than they do. Tier 2 was no better.

God I hope I never have to talk to them again - it was mind-numbing

I think this still falls into the HW category...kinda

Today I had the pleasure of canceling my DSL Elite account with AT&T as my new Time Warner Fiber Optic Wideband went active.

With AT&T i maxed @ 5.2 Mbps - the fastest DSL they have.

Now with the fiber going all the way to my house -- well have a look for yourself

:D

This is a peak of course, but sustained speeds are @ 90Mbps +, only 5Mbps upstream - so my idea of hosting thousands of torrents wont work.

My brand new Linksys E3000 w/ DD-WRT is now obsolete - now its just a matter of doing some tweaking.

If anyone knows some good hacks for the Motorola Surfboard DOCSIS 3.0 modem, I'd appreciate it.

I'm not trying to rain on your parade, but ISP fees in the U.S. are outrageous! I am currently in South Korea with a 100mbs connection, up/down, and only costs <$30 a month, and yea, no monthly bandwidth limit.

I realize the U.S. is playing catch up with the rest of the world as far as infrastructure, but good lord, is the average consumer supposed to fund widespread broadband connectivity?

946351277.png

I'm not trying to rain on your parade, but ISP fees in the U.S. are outrageous! I am currently in South Korea with a 100mbs connection, up/down, and only costs <$30 a month, and yea, no monthly bandwidth limit.

I realize the U.S. is playing catch up with the rest of the world as far as infrastructure, but good lord, is the average consumer supposed to fund widespread broadband connectivity?

Lol yeh, same here in Hong Kong. And whats funnier is that my ISP in HK is trying to get rid of any speeds lower than 30/30 by upgrading everyone who has them for free (no increase in your monthly bill, and no setup fees)

It partly has to do with the size of the country, and also in some locations a cable company will have like a monopoly on the local market. For example, in Daytona Beach the only ISP is Brighthouse (aka Time Warner) and the best connection they offer is 15 / 2 (down / up) for a lovely $60 a month, or you can get a 7.5 / 1 connection for an even lovelier $50. So the $100 he's paying in Texas for that connection seems so much more reasonable lol.

I've never understood why they limit the upload speed to such a pathetically low amount. I realize that with regular browsing it doesn't really make a difference, but with like games / VOIP / torrents etc a high upload speed could work in your favor.

Oh for crying out loud, try moving here! Downloading atm and getting a lovely 365 kbs. :( :cry: :pinch:ADSL 1 because 2 is not available at my exchange. Glad the labor party got back in to continue NBN roll out! :cool:

Would love to get a 1/4 of those speeds

honestly most webservers or internet services don't even max out decent broadband connections(ie 15mbpsdown2mbps up).

i think steam is the fastest i can get a file to download aside from a torrent of how i met your mother(5 seasons in ~an hour, ~20 episodes each, ~350mb each episode), and they don't max out my connection.

i think i'm on the business package but still, until world wide infastructure improves, particularly in the US and europe, such a connection is pretty much useless for anything beyond speedtests, especially with such a gimpy up speed. though i'll admit for what it is for $100 a month it's really decent, in the states, depending on ISP up time.

for countries such as korea, and other asian countries with average speeds of 50/50mbps, those speeds are really only relevant inside of those countries, though there are a fair percentage of people in them that like to run multiple(several) instances of their favourite online games simulataneously 24/7. as stated above they also tend to be fairly small so the costs of putting in place teh infrastructure for such speeds is alot smaller than north america or even europe(despite most EU countries being similar in size)

for countries such as korea, and other asian countries with average speeds of 50/50mbps, those speeds are really only relevant inside of those countries, though there are a fair percentage of people in them that like to run multiple(several) instances of their favourite online games simulataneously 24/7. as stated above they also tend to be fairly small so the costs of putting in place teh infrastructure for such speeds is alot smaller than north america or even europe(despite most EU countries being similar in size)

Not quite, if a download manager is used, and the server permits multiple connections, a 100mbs connection reaches it's limits quicker than you think. It's like a CPU, it can never be fast enough.

Not quite, if a download manager is used, and the server permits multiple connections, a 100mbs connection reaches it's limits quicker than you think. It's like a CPU, it can never be fast enough.

fair enough.

most files that one might download tend to be on servers that don't allow this though, or are quickly stopping this from being allowed. i suppose you could work around it most of the time.

I have AT&T standard DSL, but was nearly screwed with their Uverse service. (Their TV service shares your broadband line, which is severely limited.) I want FiOS, but it only comes to Polk County. :(

The TV side doesn't kill my bandwidth at all, can be watching an HD show and still get 16-17D on my 18 connection, heck even with the DVR recording I have no issues, and there's a a minmum two computers always online while watching TV, and there's also 2 smartphones and a Touch connected most of the time too

I realize the U.S. is playing catch up with the rest of the world as far as infrastructure, but good lord, is the average consumer supposed to fund widespread broadband connectivity?

You do realize U.S. has about 100x the land area of South Korea right?

We still have areas where dial-up or satellite is the only choice for some.

As tsupersonic mentioned, we have areas that pretty desolate - some of those smaller asian countries ...well - 1 OC-192 trunk would power the whole country's internet.

Yeah we are playing catch-up, I think as long as Genachowski remains head of the FCC - the USA will continue to improve.

Ya'll mentioned download managers might help use some of that crazy speed in web downloads - is that why they [DL managers] are still around ?

You do realize U.S. has about 100x the land area of South Korea right?

We still have areas where dial-up or satellite is the only choice for some.

As tsupersonic mentioned, we have areas that pretty desolate - some of those smaller asian countries ...well - 1 OC-192 trunk would power the whole country's internet.

Yeah we are playing catch-up, I think as long as Genachowski remains head of the FCC - the USA will continue to improve.

Well even in major cities (LA, NYC etc) internet speeds and phone technologies are still quite far behind the world.

Also, it's not like the fiber infrastructure doesn't exist in America..I'm sure it does, it just doesn't seem to be used to its full potential for multiple reasons (one of which being that often the cable companies have a monopoly on the local market and decide to rip people off).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!