Samsung Galaxy S


Recommended Posts

I bought this phone because it has the power of an iPhone but uses the Android OS, which i have been a fan (not a fan boy) of since its release.

The boxing and phone itself are almost the same as an iPhone (3g or 3gs). Only there is a slight lip at the back of the phone and it is far lighter.

The Android OS is really smooth on this device and is compairable to the speed and smoothness of the iPhone. There is sometimes lag when many apps are open and\ir if you install some application that is a bit buggy, but otherwise it is a smooth ride!

In comparison to the iPhone, i would say this is equal in MANY ways and has the added bonus of being OpenSource, so you have far more control over the device than you would an iPhone.

The drawback of the phone, which for me is quite a big thing:

The music players are a little rubbishy. There is no program other than possibly DoubleTwist, which will create true playlists on the device and import iTunes playlists (as i had created loads over the years!).

The only player that seems to truely see the playlists is "MixZing". This is a great app and the pay for version adds support for lock screen controls similar to the iPhone\iPod. It allows you to keep the app in memory after closing for more speed when starting the application in future.

I upgraded to the latest beta firmware today which uses Froyo 2.2 and there is SOME improvement on the gapless playback for MP3 format, although there is still a large gap which would be annoying to those who have seperate MP3s within their albums. Apparently though this will be completely fixed in future Android updates because of the implimentation of OpenCore 2.06, which is used for the sound board etc.

Any questions on other aspects, please let me know!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/939566-samsung-galaxy-s/
Share on other sites

Both phones have pluses and minuses: Samsung has a bigger screen but lower ppi resolution, Open Source OS but not as refined as the iOS, removable battery but with a lower life than iPhone 4's. Overall a descent phone...

Here is one pretty descent review comparing both phones.

Galaxy S & iPhone 4 Review

Cheers

Both phones have pluses and minuses: Samsung has a bigger screen but lower ppi resolution, Open Source OS but not as refined as the iOS, removable battery but with a lower life than iPhone 4's. Overall a descent phone...

Here is one pretty descent review comparing both phones.

Galaxy S & iPhone 4 Review

Cheers

Actually, it has a bigger screen AND a more clearer/colourful screen. As for the battery life, since when did iPhones last two and half days?

EDIT: And I didn't really expect an Apple lover like you to post a decent review, and after reading it, I was right.

Actually, it has a bigger screen AND a more clearer/colourful screen. As for the battery life, since when did iPhones last two and half days?

EDIT: And I didn't really expect an Apple lover like you to post a decent review, and after reading it, I was right.

But then we don't expect a Apple hater like you to post anything decent either.

how is does the galaxy s mimic the iphone os at all?

there are virtually zero similaritys.

Actually there are quite a few.

Samsung-Galaxy-S.jpg

The chrome border around the phone (like the 3g and 3gs) and the launcher is made up of square icons, with 4 at the bottom in a dock, which pages that scroll side to side.

Actually there are quite a few.

Samsung-Galaxy-S.jpg

The chrome border around the phone (like the 3g and 3gs) and the launcher is made up of square icons, with 4 at the bottom in a dock, which pages that scroll side to side.

Samsung mimics the iphone because they lay their icons out in a grid?!

are you joking me?!

And that picture you linked is the 'app drawer' not the home screen.

and I own an iphone...

I've been using my iPhone 3G for about 1 1/2 years now and I am so sick and tired of it's bull****. I've been using Android phones since the G1 first came out, got it on an upgrade and now on Oct 25 my contract ends and I can not wait until I get the Samsung Vibrant a member of the Galaxy S family for T-Mobile.

I really like the iPhone 4 but I had enough with iOS and want to go back to Android. Much better mods, firmwares, etc. And the ability to overclock/underclock? Makes me want to buy a second hand G1 or MyTouch right now...

It has more power than the iPhone 4. Look up the GPU specs of this and the iPhone.

As for Froyo, I would stay away from all current firmwares, JP2, JP3, JPC, JPH, etc. They are still a little buggy and may cause problems down the line.

They are both compairable in overall spec. I wouldnt say either outdoes the other in total, but certain aspects of the iphone are better and other aspects of the Samsung are better, so they are both COMPAIRABLE.

Take it from someone who is not a fanboy on either side! :)

I have upgraded to the latest (and likely to be final) release of 2.2 on the phone and see lots of small improvements, especially when it comes to the gapless playback!

Both phones have pluses and minuses: Samsung has a bigger screen but lower ppi resolution, Open Source OS but not as refined as the iOS, removable battery but with a lower life than iPhone 4's. Overall a descent phone...

Here is one pretty descent review comparing both phones.

Galaxy S & iPhone 4 Review

Cheers

Not read your review, but i agree, they are both compairable overall.

Actually there are quite a few.

Samsung-Galaxy-S.jpg

The chrome border around the phone (like the 3g and 3gs) and the launcher is made up of square icons, with 4 at the bottom in a dock, which pages that scroll side to side.

The hardware side of the phone does indeed look like a 3G\s, however the software, when you really get to play with it, is nothing at all like the iPhone. It in fact is far more powerful than the iPhone, because you can change the whole style, look and feel to be how ever you want! How else can they present the OS though really? Are you going to say they are copying iOS because they have square icons and the screen is black when switched off? :p

Came close to getting it but went with HTC Desire instead. It does look very nice and is more powerful then desire, but from what I read it had too many problems.

The mentioned laggyness and GPS apparently is rubbish. Not sure on how are fixes coming along, but I must say that at times I regret not getting it :D

Came close to getting it but went with HTC Desire instead. It does look very nice and is more powerful then desire, but from what I read it had too many problems.

The mentioned laggyness and GPS apparently is rubbish. Not sure on how are fixes coming along, but I must say that at times I regret not getting it :D

I think the laggyness was in the earlier builds. The phone ran fine straight out of the box for me and just as well on Froyo. I have tried GPS and to be honest have seen no more issues than the iPhone :s

Bah, I disabled Touchwiz immediately in favor of LauncherPro. Running Froyo JPH and it runs nicely. Beats the Desire and any other Android device hands-down, particularly when you compare the screens.

I love the Touchwiz, however have not tried LauncherPro... Is it similar or as good etc?

Came close to getting it but went with HTC Desire instead. It does look very nice and is more powerful then desire, but from what I read it had too many problems.

The mentioned laggyness and GPS apparently is rubbish. Not sure on how are fixes coming along, but I must say that at times I regret not getting it :D

I've not had a problem with the GPS the couple of times I've used it, it was pretty damn accurate to be perfectly honest.

I wanted a desire but it was easier and quicker to get a Galaxy and I'm glad I did, so I'm kind of in the opposite set to you :D

How are you guys getting Froyo on your phones? the official samsung update isn't out for a couple more days yet I think, so are you all using pre-release/custom jobs?

I love the Touchwiz, however have not tried LauncherPro... Is it similar or as good etc?

Looks and feels better than Touchwiz but that's my opinion. It is comparable to Sense. It is also quite customizable. I do recommend the Pro version as it does have more features but you can easily get it free off the market. It won't remove Touchwiz, merely give an option and is easily uninstallable if you don't like it.

How are you guys getting Froyo on your phones? the official samsung update isn't out for a couple more days yet I think, so are you all using pre-release/custom jobs?

You can get it through Kies if you enable the "Test" mode and set the sources. JPH most likely the final version. Check xda for more information. http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=656

I've not had a problem with the GPS the couple of times I've used it, it was pretty damn accurate to be perfectly honest.

I wanted a desire but it was easier and quicker to get a Galaxy and I'm glad I did, so I'm kind of in the opposite set to you :D

How are you guys getting Froyo on your phones? the official samsung update isn't out for a couple more days yet I think, so are you all using pre-release/custom jobs?

Just add this to the end of your Hosts file:

174.123.5.146 fus.samsungmobile.com

Then fire up Kies, connect your device and you will instantly be told an update is available... Just make sure you backup your apps and settinsg first, as you MIGHT need to wipe them out during or after the upgrade!

  • 2 weeks later...

Personally I tend to favour HTC phones simply for the reason that I find SenseUI to provide the most polished Android user experience, but Android as a platform is excellent on any phone. Personally i'd root the Galaxy S and install a stock Froyo ROM on it, you'd probably get better performance

  • 1 month later...

I agree, I have had my iPhone 3G for 1 year and got my Galaxy S a few weeks back and the Galaxy S is far Superior to iPhone.

I loved my iPhone, as I came from a crappy Symbian Nokia past and the iPhone was a revelation, it completely revolutionized phones. But once you go Android you never go back. The iPhone is just soooo crippled it is useless. With Android you have flexibility to do things you want like copy an mp3 over as if your phone is a USB device and then select that mp3 as your ring tone. Try doing that on an iPhone....

But the are some bugs with Galaxy S

#1 it is poorly supported by Samsung. As of Nov 5 2010 there is still no Froyo 2.2 for it.

#2 WiFi is buggy as hell. I have 2 AP's in my house, with my iPhone it remembers the IP's it should use for each and it seamlessly connects to the right AP as I move about the house. On the Galaxy you have only 1 setting for static IP and you need to change it for each AP. Also, the galaxy will not connect automatically to the strongest signal AP, I have to force it. Also, with the iPhone you can put in authenticated proxy details for work/school networks, on Android you can't.

#3 The apps are generally comparable to iPhone but I do miss some of the iPhone apps, all the weather apps are crap on the Android for example.

But the are some bugs with Galaxy S

#1 it is poorly supported by Samsung. As of Nov 5 2010 there is still no Froyo 2.2 for it. Wrong.

#2 WiFi is buggy as hell. I have 2 AP's in my house, with my iPhone it remembers the IP's it should use for each and it seamlessly connects to the right AP as I move about the house. On the Galaxy you have only 1 setting for static IP and you need to change it for each AP. Also, the galaxy will not connect automatically to the strongest signal AP, I have to force it. Also, with the iPhone you can put in authenticated proxy details for work/school networks, on Android you can't. Wrong. This has been corrected in 2.2 and I think in the later 2.1 builds. The Galaxy S will automatically remember each WiFi access point and connect to the strongest one.

#3 The apps are generally comparable to iPhone but I do miss some of the iPhone apps, all the weather apps are crap on the Android for example. The weather apps are okay but most of the good ones aren't free.

Since day one, I've replace TouchWiz with Launcher Pro paid. It's comparable to Sense. Fancy Widget gives the HTC Sense Clock which is nice. At the moment, there are a group of developers dedicated to porting the Desire HD rom over to the Galaxy S. Samsung is dedicated to giving users Froyo and it has been released in several countries (mostly in Europe). Samsung can't be expected to provide every user 2.2 as they rely on the phone carriers to release them over Kies. You can however download the base Samsung Froyo rom and flash through Odin or make changes in your registry plus host file and get it directly through Samsung. However, you'll need to add your carriers information such as access points etc yourself.

Since day one, I've replace ...

I must have a faulty 2.2 then as it rarely if ever will connect to the strogest signal, I have to fight with it. I will repeatedly force it to go to the strongest AP, the 1 I am standing next to, but it will auto revert back to the other distant AP that is 1 bar weak signal. By fight I mean I try to force connect it upto 10 times and still no go. The best chance I have is to turn off wi-fi then back on again and 50% of the time it will then correctly connect to the AP I am physically standing next to.

Also, 2.2 will not remember multiple static IP's. You have only 1 option. Turn on static IP or off, and in that option you have to write in the IP.

For the iPhone you can select the wi-fi profile, go into and edit the settings and manually put static IP's for each AP and the iPhone will remember.

I'll look into the HTC port as I like the look of their UI

  • 1 month later...

I agree, I have had my iPhone 3G for 1 year and got my Galaxy S a few weeks back and the Galaxy S is far Superior to iPhone.

I loved my iPhone, as I came from a crappy Symbian Nokia past and the iPhone was a revelation, it completely revolutionized phones. But once you go Android you never go back. The iPhone is just soooo crippled it is useless. With Android you have flexibility to do things you want like copy an mp3 over as if your phone is a USB device and then select that mp3 as your ring tone. Try doing that on an iPhone....

But the are some bugs with Galaxy S

#1 it is poorly supported by Samsung. As of Nov 5 2010 there is still no Froyo 2.2 for it.

#2 WiFi is buggy as hell. I have 2 AP's in my house, with my iPhone it remembers the IP's it should use for each and it seamlessly connects to the right AP as I move about the house. On the Galaxy you have only 1 setting for static IP and you need to change it for each AP. Also, the galaxy will not connect automatically to the strongest signal AP, I have to force it. Also, with the iPhone you can put in authenticated proxy details for work/school networks, on Android you can't.

#3 The apps are generally comparable to iPhone but I do miss some of the iPhone apps, all the weather apps are crap on the Android for example.

Great reply, I have to totally agree with you.

I had the iPhone 3G for a coupe years and it was a great phone but after using the Samsung Galaxy S Captivate, there's no going back to iOS after you've been on Android. I've actually had some problems with my Samsung unit, I believe it's a lemon and a new one is being sent to me as I write this, but I've had to go back to my iPhone again and it feels like I have handcuffs on when using the thing!

When you've actually used both OS's you MUST see that Apple has you by the throat and will only let by what they want in their little "Ecosystem" or whatever you/they want to call it.

I waited for the Captivate to come out on Rogers because of the form factor. The Captivate looks a lot better than the other Galaxy S versions imo, but they all have pretty much the same hardware, although some versions have a front facing camera, which to me I wouldn't see myself using that much.

Anyways, if there is anybody on the fence about buying a Samsung Galaxy S (any version)... My vote is... get one!!

  • 3 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!