Rift MMO


Recommended Posts

there doesn't seem to be an OB planned or even time for one between now and launch. there was some comments that seem to indicate not even all the planned CBs will be able to be done before the launch.

apparently it's pretty easy to hit the beta caps on multiple character and pvp on the beta weekends. ofc this bring about the usually silly assumptions that the levels after the cap will be just as fast to to level through(see this in nearly every mmo beta where the cap is low and leveling to it is fast).

but overall the betas seem very good comparatively., quick fixes to player issues and responses to player feedback in each patch.

How does the community seem so far?

So far that i've seen they are very helpful. Every time i had a question people were more than happy to answer, and they seemed very mature. Whether this will change after it gets out of the closed beta status is yet to be seen, but i have enjoyed what i've seen so far.

In other news upon reflecting with my experiences in the game i would seriously consider reserving this game if i had another chance at the beta, i think i was a little harsh on it to begin with,and realize that i had messed up my settings some, so the game is actually much better looking then i remember. It has some damn good potential to be a good WoW competitor if the company supports it to a good extent.

Got into the last beta, but given that it was right between Christmas and the New Year I didn't have time to play it. They let me in again though, and I just got through playing about an hour of it.

It's WoW. With a different look.

I'm not complaining, as I love WoW. But it really is almost exactly the same. The only difference is the class customization... Though one could argue that the classes are all available in WoW as the separate talent trees. For example, the mage lets you choose between Chloromancer (balance druid), Pyromancer (fire mage), Warlock (description sounded like an affliction warlock), Necromancer (demonology warlock), Stormcaller (elemental shaman/frost mage mix), etc. So while it seems like there are a lot of options, it's really just splitting it differently. Instead of 10 classes with 3 specializations each, you have 4 classes with 8 specializations each (3 can be active at a time, I believe).

Once again, this is not a complaint, just an observation.

And being able to mix and match so much isn't necessarily a good thing. You end up with abilities that are duplicates (or otherwise extremely close). For example, I made a rogue and went with Assassination first, and then Blade Dancer. Both had a finishing move (yes, it uses combo points, just like WoW's rogue) that did exactly the same thing, except one did slightly less damage. Why? Why not make them a bit different? Perhaps give me a DoT or something on one of them, something that gives me a reason to use both. Instead I had one that I took off my action bar as soon as I realized it was completely useless.

All in all, it seems pretty cool, but I don't really see too much to differentiate it from WoW, other than the look. Is that a bad thing? Not necessarily. But what are they going to do to pull in players?

This is all just from an hour or so of playing. Maybe end-game content or PvP are different than WoW; I'm not sure yet.

Got into the last beta, but given that it was right between Christmas and the New Year I didn't have time to play it. They let me in again though, and I just got through playing about an hour of it.

It's WoW. With a different look.

I'm not complaining, as I love WoW. But it really is almost exactly the same. The only difference is the class customization... Though one could argue that the classes are all available in WoW as the separate talent trees. For example, the mage lets you choose between Chloromancer (balance druid), Pyromancer (fire mage), Warlock (description sounded like an affliction warlock), Necromancer (demonology warlock), Stormcaller (elemental shaman/frost mage mix), etc. So while it seems like there are a lot of options, it's really just splitting it differently. Instead of 10 classes with 3 specializations each, you have 4 classes with 8 specializations each (3 can be active at a time, I believe).

Once again, this is not a complaint, just an observation.

And being able to mix and match so much isn't necessarily a good thing. You end up with abilities that are duplicates (or otherwise extremely close). For example, I made a rogue and went with Assassination first, and then Blade Dancer. Both had a finishing move (yes, it uses combo points, just like WoW's rogue) that did exactly the same thing, except one did slightly less damage. Why? Why not make them a bit different? Perhaps give me a DoT or something on one of them, something that gives me a reason to use both. Instead I had one that I took off my action bar as soon as I realized it was completely useless.

All in all, it seems pretty cool, but I don't really see too much to differentiate it from WoW, other than the look. Is that a bad thing? Not necessarily. But what are they going to do to pull in players?

This is all just from an hour or so of playing. Maybe end-game content or PvP are different than WoW; I'm not sure yet.

I don't think it's so much as relying on innovation to drawn players in, as much as offer an alternative to WoW, as in "do you want to play WoW, or do you want to play Rift?" Both are very similar, it's like "do you want to play Call of Duty, or Battlefield?". Both games are shooters, but offer slightly different takes on the genre. Rift is attempting to combine the public quest things from Warhammer (i can't recall the name) with the raids/instances of WoW. The soul system in Rift is like taking the class combination system from Guild Wars and mixing it with World of Warcraft talent system in which you get to mix and match various talent trees from WoW and make a custom class. An individual may find themselves drawn to one or the other, in the way that someone might compare a Zune and an iPod. Both are very alike, but it's apples or oranges. People that don't want WoW itself, but want a game like it can try Rift, and vice-versa. I am honestly hoping that this game does well, because if it can offer a strong alternative to WoW it can get some healthy competition going (which, sadly, no other game on the market seems to offer WoW).

Rift is sort of a combination of WoW, Warhammer and DAOC.

I haven't made it into the PvP yet, but from what I'm hearing it's

sort of like the Realm battles in DAOC... just without Relics.

Anyhow, I've been having fun with it. It'll be interesting to see

the end-game PvP, though. In the end, that's what will make

or break the longevity of the game.

http://www.gamebreaker.tv/video/this-week-in-mmo-28-rift-special-edition/2010/12

Absolutely great video about Rift, made by the guy that makes the WoW tankspot videos. I must say, i'm growing to like this game. WoW has been getting stale (nothing against the game, it's great, but damn i've been playing 5 years), and the fact that if players don't take down Rifts they will get out of control and eventually take over the map is absolutely amazing. That means players will have to care about them, because eventually they will spread so far players will have no option but to fight back.

http://www.gamebreaker.tv/video/this-week-in-mmo-28-rift-special-edition/2010/12

Absolutely great video about Rift, made by the guy that makes the WoW tankspot videos. I must say, i'm growing to like this game. WoW has been getting stale (nothing against the game, it's great, but damn i've been playing 5 years), and the fact that if players don't take down Rifts they will get out of control and eventually take over the map is absolutely amazing. That means players will have to care about them, because eventually they will spread so far players will have no option but to fight back.

too bad you can't watch that movie, it breaks after a few minutes no matter where you try to start it.

I started playing it today, it's nice but it'll take me a while to get used to having played WoW for 4 years. I'm still only level 7, but everything is going well so far. Only gripe if I had to list one would be that my FPS is very low, even with settings turned down, and I have a GTS 450.

I started playing it today, it's nice but it'll take me a while to get used to having played WoW for 4 years. I'm still only level 7, but everything is going well so far. Only gripe if I had to list one would be that my FPS is very low, even with settings turned down, and I have a GTS 450.

I've seen many reports of people having FPS troubles, but i'm not too worried about it - it's only closed beta after all. That's just a simple optimization fix.

So, anyone Neowinians planning on getting this game? It would be great to get a Neowin guild going.

i'm thinking about it. there's a couple people i could play with from another forum. i love trying out new mmo's at launch too, so much rage in them and such good trolling in zone chat.

mostly depends on if it's on steam or not. anyone know? i got another xmas cheque last week so i have more gaming money.

i'm thinking about it. there's a couple people i could play with from another forum. i love trying out new mmo's at launch too, so much rage in them and such good trolling in zone chat.

mostly depends on if it's on steam or not. anyone know? i got another xmas cheque last week so i have more gaming money.

Yep, it is.

I've been really enjoying the multi class system but aside from that there isn't very much that is new.

Like i said above, they are not attempting to offer a totally new MMO experience; they are trying to create a polished, and well working alternative. In the same that if someone is bored of Call of Duty they can try Battlefield, or vice versa. If people are bored with WoW, but want a equally polished, and content-full experience they can try Rift. Rift is trying to be the Battlefield to the WoW CoD, and from what i'm seeing they are succeeding. I'm tired of WoW, but i like the gameplay and polish so i will most likely play Rift, as it's much like WoW but it's changed up enough that it will feel fresh. I applaud the developer for offering a polished and complete experience that will compete with WoW on the front of having a content-rich, polished, and well developed experience; rather than trying to redefine the genre and fail (FFXIV).

The main reason I enjoy Rift is that it satisfies my need for customization. WoW and many other MMO's don't do that. Be it in the character appearance or the abilities a game must allow me to create the kind of character I want to create and Rift does that very well with the current tree system. Even if the visual representation of the character is minimally customizable that tree alone makes the game worth playing.

The main reason I enjoy Rift is that it satisfies my need for customization. WoW and many other MMO's don't do that. Be it in the character appearance or the abilities a game must allow me to create the kind of character I want to create and Rift does that very well with the current tree system. Even if the visual representation of the character is minimally customizable that tree alone makes the game worth playing.

I agree, i can't wait to see how group composition will work. With them planning on giving very little addon support we will see very few addons like "Deadly boss mods", people will need to know their class and the battles. The fact that there is so much possibility might be very awesome in raids. Instead of needing a dedicated healer, you could bring a mage who can do fine damage, but heal those around him for some of the damage he does. Or instead of needing 3 healers you might only need 1 + a bard who could buff and off-heal, thus eliminating some of the damage and being able to fix up any that might get through.

It also allows for off-builds where your fighting a bard who is buffing his friends and debuffing enemies and when you get close he suddenly vanishes only to assassinate you from behind. The creativity available in the builds is huge and the only thing I wish we could do is mix the base classes as well. Still, this is more than I expected and I almost feel it operates better than Guild War's system.

It also allows for off-builds where your fighting a bard who is buffing his friends and debuffing enemies and when you get close he suddenly vanishes only to assassinate you from behind. The creativity available in the builds is huge and the only thing I wish we could do is mix the base classes as well. Still, this is more than I expected and I almost feel it operates better than Guild War's system.

Yup, i think it will add a great twist to PvP. You can see their armor type (what base class they are), but what souls they have will be a mystery until you engage them. You will have to adapt on the fly because a warrior may only show one of his souls, and still have 2 waiting to surprise you.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nearly half of American adults now use AI, but concerns are also growing by Hamid Ganji Since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022, the way people research, get their news, and perform routine tasks has changed dramatically. Now, almost everything around us has a touch of AI, and companies are trying to embed it into nearly every product and service they offer. With that in mind, new research shows how Americans are actually adopting this change and using AI in their everyday lives. According to new research conducted by the Pew Research Center, 49% of American adults now use AI chatbots like ChatGPT or Gemini. This marks a significant increase over last year, when only 33% of American adults reported using AI. Additionally, four in ten U.S. adults (42%) said they use AI tools to research information, while 38% said they use these tools to handle tasks at work. Entertainment, image and video editing, and getting medical advice are among the other ways Americans are using AI. Moreover, ChatGPT dominates the U.S. AI market, with 44% of respondents saying they use OpenAI's chatbot. Gemini follows at 24%, while Copilot and Meta AI account for 17% and 14%, respectively. Respondents also said that AI chatbots generally have a positive impact on their productivity and how informed they are. But when it comes to AI’s impact on society, Americans remain largely skeptical. About 40% of American adults believe AI will be more harmful than beneficial to society over the next 20 years. Additionally, 31% expect AI to have a negative effect on them personally. Another 31% of respondents say AI could be equally positive and negative. As for data security, pessimism remains high: 71% of respondents say AI will make their personal information less secure, while only 3% believe it will make their data more secure. American adults also largely lack confidence in both the government and AI companies when it comes to regulating and developing AI. About 67% of Americans have little to no confidence in the U.S. government’s ability to regulate AI effectively. Six in ten adults are also not confident that U.S. companies will develop and use these tools responsibly.
    • MultiOS-USB 0.11.1 by Razvan Serea MultiOS-USB is a versatile, open-source utility designed to create multiboot USB drives capable of hosting multiple operating systems on a single portable device. The project simplifies the process of building a bootable USB by automating the configuration of various boot loaders and file systems, enabling users to install and run diverse operating systems, including Windows, Linux distributions, and diagnostic tools, directly from one drive. It supports ISO booting and persistence, which allows changes made during live sessions to be retained, making it ideal for testing, troubleshooting, or system recovery. Features: BIOS and UEFI support Secure Boot support (boot, manage uefi keys) Load UEFI drivers Launch .efi executables and other boot loaders Boot Linux from .iso images Boot WinPE from bootable .wim images Boot Windows 10/11 installer from ISO (currently, SB must be disabled during installation) Boot Linux installer from network (experimental) Boot locally installed systems: Linux, Windows Automatically update configuration files Without background services exFAT file system support Automatic detection of compatible ISO images (GRUB loopback) Support for systems without loopback support Allows customisation of ISO boot menu (for example: custom kernel options) Support for USB, SSD, nvme, mmcblk, loop, nbd and virtual disks Support for x86, x86_64 A list of tested ISO images can be found here MultiOS-USB 0.11.1 changelog: 68122b7: Fixed-release AUR package #63 fba0283: Update shim to 16.1 8c2ae95: Update grub to v2.14-1 ea15c1d: Update Memtest86+ to v8.10 162f4e6: Add secureblue (#71) b2da8ae: Add AerynOS (#74) ac6640e: Bump config.version 34e9ca6: Add Bluefin (#72) 7a10edd: Add Aurora (#66) cab701b: Update wimboot to v2.9.0-1 90da7f7: Fix Windows error: 0x80070001 - 0x4002F (#52) 2dea73d: Add Microsoft certificates 01f479e: Remove old efi_uga module Download: MultiOS-USB 0.11.1 | 5.3 MB (Open Source) View: MultiOS-USB Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Latest Rufus update improves new Windows 11 install method by Taras Buria Pete Batard, the maker of Rufus, a very popular app for creating bootable Windows (and other OS) media, has released a new beta version of its app. Rufus 4.15 beta is now out, and while it offers no new features, there are all sorts of improvements and fixes, including for the new Windows 11 installation method that was introduced in version 4.14 in early May. The "Silent Windows 11 installation" is a new feature whose goal is to automate operating system installation. All you have to do is boot from the drive, and then Rufus takes over, doing all things for you, such as setting up a new account, skipping ads and prompts, and more. It is a very handy tool, but initially, it had some bugs and issues that required addressing. With version 4.15 beta, Rufus is fixing that, particularly a bug with installation failing at 75%, crashes on Snapdragon X-based PCs, and more. Here is the changelog: Rufus 4.15 beta is now available for download from its GitHub repository. If you have never used Rufus before, you can check out our guide here. It is a very useful utility to have, as it allows you to deal with plenty of Windows 11's annoyances, which are still there, despite Microsoft's ongoing efforts to fix them.
    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!