Recommended Posts

M2 is not finalized, the M2 just started in december!

http://img708.images...anstitrefvy.jpg

so , they would churn out another 60 something builds build till then ?

if that so , we won't hear anything untail winHEC '11 or/and PDC '11 as beta quality (even that events are scheduled)

If this post is true, then apparently the build Microsoft showed at CES 2011 is an old one since it is Build 7867. I wouldn't be surprised since it's probably more stable than the cutting edge builds.

windows-8-build-7867-pre-release.jpg

Maybe with UI bits all over the place too. They're definitely trying to keep anything other than ARM compatibility under wraps for now. At least until a newer build leaks. :p

I know this probably doesn't mean anything (User Agent Strings can be spoofed), but there have been multiple sightings of Internet Explorer 9 on Windows NT 6.2 in the wild. Keep an eye out for "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.2; Trident/5.0)" and "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/5.0)" or similar NT 6.2 strings in the coming days/weeks.

Maybe with UI bits all over the place too. They're definitely trying to keep anything other than ARM compatibility under wraps for now. At least until a newer build leaks. :p

Good point. I hadn't thought of that :). Though the language they used at CES when referring to the build being Windows 8 but with Windows 7 UI gives me a hint that they have something big planned for the UI. Also any indication of Microsoft having yet another PDC again this year?

  • 2 weeks later...

That's interesting because Windows 8 is mean't to be a major release while Windows 7 wasn't. It's too early to say that they won't bump up the version numbering because they could.

Other way around buddy :) Windows Vista was the major release and 7 was a .X release. Windows 8 is supposed to be another big release and i'm definitely excited for that!

Other way around buddy :) Windows Vista was the major release and 7 was a .X release. Windows 8 is supposed to be another big release and i'm definitely excited for that!

All because of a misplaced apostrophe in his comment. He said what you said :)

Classic Theme for example.

I don't have a problem with the Classic Theme. I know people have said it can make their computer run more smoothly when playing games - whether that aspect is true or not, I don't know. I'm not much of a PC gamer, but the Classic theme is something I don't mind having on my machine. When I messed up my Vista install for a while as I attempted to install a visual style for the first time (I did a terrible, terrible job), I switched to the Classic theme until I could work out a method of returning it to default. That is one of the occasions I can say I was glad for the Classic theme being present on my machine. Personally, I'd like to see Microsoft embracing visual styles more with Windows 8. I know that it is highly, highly unlikely, but I'd love it if they provided us with a simplified install process and features to make theming our OS even more straightforward. Browsers such as Chrome, Opera, and Firefox are all successful, and have a community behind them who simply enjoy creating themes for the browsers. If that can work for an open-source program, why not Windows? It might not be open-source, but even if they provided an optional client for downloading themes or something from a 'Windows Marketplace' or something, it could work out. Companies could probably profit from it as well, offering themes related to their brands for a sum. I can't see them being popular themes, but even so, it could be tried.

I wouldn't be surprised if the following happened

Midway through the beta they come up with a decent security scheme for the kernel and bump the build number to 6.5.xxxx. Also why don't they just empty out windows media player and let the user decide what they'd like to install like they did with windows messenger. Furthermore, they should focus a little more on optimizing for SSD drives as they are starting to become widespread somewhat. Lastly, they need to make the entire operating system touch friendly period.

MS needs to clean legacy crap from Windows.

I hope/wish that they move the legacy stuff to an app store, where the OS can download it as needed. All of my printers are USB printers and I haven't had to download a driver in forever.

Classic Theme for example.

Classic it's just the standard UI without a theme on top of it. It's like Windows with themes turned off, so to speak.

I agree with the idea of taking legacy code out though. Yes, old apps wouldn't work, but that's why you have virtualization which is now more accessible than ever. There's no longer the need to make sure every 15-year-old apps can run natively.

Classic it's just the standard UI without a theme on top of it. It's like Windows with themes turned off, so to speak.

Yeah but you don't see Mac OS X reverting back to Platinum or whatever either.

I'm still baffled by the fact that sometimes Windows Aero is just being disabled. You'll never see something like that happen on Mac OS X.

Yeah but you don't see Mac OS X reverting back to Platinum or whatever either.

I'm still baffled by the fact that sometimes Windows Aero is just being disabled. You'll never see something like that happen on Mac OS X.

Maybe because OS X is different from Windows? What are you talking about " Aero is just being disabled"? If the PC can't run it then that is a given.

Yeah but you don't see Mac OS X reverting back to Platinum or whatever either.

I'm still baffled by the fact that sometimes Windows Aero is just being disabled. You'll never see something like that happen on Mac OS X.

You never see that sort of thing happening in Mac OS because it handles its UI completely different to windows.

For Windows to work like that they would need to re write their theming engine.

Part of the reason you need to be able to disable aero is because when you are using a full screen app (like a game) it still takes up

gpu cycles in the background. It works the way it does so it can be turned off when its needed.

OS X on the other hand requires a restart to turn off QE. Imagine the uproar if windows gamers had to restart their computers ever time they wanted

to get the best performance out of a game.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!