Recommended Posts

While I'm a subscriber, frm what I can see I see no big restrictions on this game other than what's on any other free to play game. pay to unlock raids, and limited inventory and such and other basic limitations. You can still enjoy the game and group with people and do PvP and basic group dungeons.

OMG you don't get the full game for FREE!!!! OMG GAME SUCKS!!!''sorry but there's a very big very enjoyable game available in there for free. if you want the full thing, then subscribe. of course you get more and better if you subscribe. but it in no way makes the free stuff less enjoyable.

Looks like the F2P scheme won't be enough to stall the collapse of this game. Expect it to be handed off to some off-brand developers early next year.

Collapse? they've been steady at over a million for well over half a year now. after the first people dropped off after the first 6 months, they've been pretty steady, and the F2P has brought back quite a few people in addition to the steady million they have.

Collapse? they've been steady at over a million for well over half a year now. after the first people dropped off after the first 6 months, they've been pretty steady, and the F2P has brought back quite a few people in addition to the steady million they have.

No, dropped below million quite a while ago.

http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/726506/swtor-subscriptions-are-below-1-million

I can smell BDF quite a ways away so I'll leave you to your illusions from here on out.

That just says it dropped below a million, which means it could and probably still is above 900k, and they have been gaining members again the last few months so they could be above a million again now.

then again, the difference between me and you is that you simply hate the game because it's not Kotor or somethign and dont' play it, I like it and actually play it and see the amount of players that are there.

I think their biggest error was splitting the game up into that many servers to start with, had they had the amount of servers they have now, or maybe just a few more since they're starting to hit full now, I think they'd have kept a lot more players.

Played it last night and I really wasn't impressed. After playing traditional RPGs like The Witcher 2 it just didn't feel right, like I was playing a budget game from years ago. The trailers make the story elements look really good but the tedious gameplay just meant it wasn't worth the effort, even though it's free.

OMG you don't get the full game for FREE!!!! OMG GAME SUCKS!!!''sorry but there's a very big very enjoyable game available in there for free. if you want the full thing, then subscribe. of course you get more and better if you subscribe. but it in no way makes the free stuff less enjoyable.

Sure you can do the story, but that's basically it.

Here's the limitations. I'm not including common ones like character, race, and inventory limit.

No bank.

One tradeskill.

Higher respec costs. Wtf?

No raids.

5 Warzones per week.

Only full rewards from 3 Flashpoints per week.

Three space missions per week.

No emergency fleet pass.

Longer quick travel cool down.

Later level for mounts. Wtf?

Can only revive if you die 5 times in the zone at a med center. Wtf?

Increased vendor prices. Wtf?

Takes longer to gain exp. Wtf?

No rest exp.

Takes longer to gain valor levels.

GUI quickslot limitations. GUI limitations? Seriously?

I don't know about you, but with such severe limitations. The game is pretty much unenjoyable as a F2P.

Let's compare that to EQ2's free to play. Again I'm not including the common ones to the F2P model.

Can't get the full specialization points.

Adept spell tier.

That's about it. EQ2 pretty much lets you play and enjoy the entire game. They don't gimp you on stuff costing more, exp gain taking longer, mount levels, number of dungeons and raids you can do, etc. I've never seen a F2P model (well maybe except the Asian ones) that limit and punish you in so many ways.

  • Like 1

Sure you can do the story, but that's basically it.

Here's the limitations. I'm not including common ones like character, race, and inventory limit.

No bank.

One tradeskill.

Higher respec costs. Wtf?

No raids.

5 Warzones per week.

Only full rewards from 3 Flashpoints per week.

Three space missions per week.

No emergency fleet pass.

Longer quick travel cool down.

Later level for mounts. Wtf?

Can only revive if you die 5 times in the zone at a med center. Wtf?

Increased vendor prices. Wtf?

Takes longer to gain exp. Wtf?

No rest exp.

Takes longer to gain valor levels.

GUI quickslot limitations. GUI limitations? Seriously?

I don't know about you, but with such severe limitations. The game is pretty much unenjoyable as a F2P.

Let's compare that to EQ2's free to play. Again I'm not including the common ones to the F2P model.

Can't get the full specialization points.

Adept spell tier.

That's about it. EQ2 pretty much lets you play and enjoy the entire game. They don't gimp you on stuff costing more, exp gain taking longer, mount levels, number of dungeons and raids you can do, etc. I've never seen a F2P model (well maybe except the Asian ones) that limit and punish you in so many ways.

Actually, the respec cost is the same, it was lowered for subscribers.

5 war zones, yeah? Want more hey pay for it, you get 5 of then.

Want raids, yeah pay for them again. Fairly standard stuff for mixed f2p and p2p games, and less face it, it beats the living crap put of any pure f2p game

And no prices where increased, again they where reduced for subs, so it's just as playable for f2p as it used to be for p2p, and stuff is always ridiculously expensive in f2p games to make people pay.

Xp is again, same as it used to be for subscribers, and again a standard for f2p games, pay for faster experience.

As for GUI limits, actually it's also pretty common in f2p games, in addition, f2p p,ayers have the same GUI limits as used to be before f2p, they simply added more quick bars for subscribers.

Sorry not seeing how the game is unplayable or anything.

As for EQ2, having played the game both before and after your comparison fails on several levels, first there's far more differences than that, secondly, it was a dying game, it wasn't even close to half of SWTORs subs, heck I believe they where under 250k when they went free. And it was and old game approaching end of life and it aged terribly.

Xilo's posts
HMARG.jpg

My take on your complaints as a F2Player of several games, having trial experience in this game and my current character is a Sith Pureblood/Assassin:

  • race --- Standard stuff, Sith Purebloods are the Master Race.
  • inventory limit (+ one crewskills) --- Standard stuff, it doesn't make sense to have several crewskills when you have an inventory limit and your companion can't even remote sell the stuff.
  • No bank --- Standard stuff.
  • Higher respec costs. Wtf? --- Higher... because the subscribers actually don't pay anything. F2Players do. Still standard stuff.
  • No raids. --- I don't know what those are, but I agree with you just for the greed of it.
  • 5 Warzones per week. --- I don't like the group PVP thing.
  • Only full rewards from 3 Flashpoints per week. --- Agreed.
  • Three space missions per week. --- Agreed.
  • No emergency fleet pass. --- I don't need it.
  • Longer quick travel cool down. --- I don't need it.
  • Later level for mounts. --- Assassins don't mount. They sneak around.
  • Can only revive if you die 5 times in the zone at a med center. --- Not at a med center, but in the field. And that's more than you get in other games.
  • Increased vendor prices. --- Standard stuff, even in the real world.
  • character (+ Takes longer to gain exp) --- Standard stuff, and if you take longer to level, it would made no sense to parallelize several characters.
  • No rest exp. --- I never saw this in any game I had played, subscribers should consider themselves fortunate.
  • Takes longer to gain valor levels. --- Standard stuff.
  • GUI quickslot limitations. --- As an Assassin, I don't need more than 2 quickbars.

Currency cap is standard too. The only thing that ****es me off are the commendation and gear caps.

In the end, if you don't play a lot, you don't need to subscribe.

  • 2 months later...

So is anyone else still playing this? I recently came back as a full subscriber and I'm loving the new content.

Guild Wars 2 got stale on me pretty quick.

P.S.

I'm on the The Ebon Hawk server, Empire side, running with my guild: The Wolf Pack.

Yeah im playing as a full sub but I doubt ill keep payin when my time is up.

Playing both republic (lvl 50 Smuggler/Gunslinger) and a lvl 20ish Bounty Hunter/Powertech.

No clue the name of the server, but its the PVE asia pacific one. No Guild to speak of :)

The new content specially on Illum I like, but to me once you hit 50, there is no real content that drives you to keep going. Its just do dailies and flashpoints for gear.

I'm still playing (Jedi Covenant - Roving Guns - Imperial).

I left the game a couple months before F2P launched (my guild fell apart and we were still waiting on content). I just came back about a month ago and have been having a lot of fun.

I really like a lot of the new customization items that they've made available through the market. And it's easy enough to get that stuff without paying real money, as well.

I've had a chance to run the new operation (Terror From Beyond) and I have to say I like where Bioware is going with encounter design. The Operator IX and The Terror From Beyond fights are especially good.

The new World Event has been awesome. The first few days, my server had 10 instances of Ilum up and it's been at least 5 every day since (ranges up to 7-8).

And the new reputation system is actually very well designed. Legacy wide (!!!) means I don't have to grind it on every character and a cap on rep per week means that even casual players can keep up with the rewards available at each tier. And making the rep tokens items means you can go all out in 1 week and stockpile rep tokens to turn in in the following weeks without having to keep doing all the dailies week after week (I have about 20 green, 10ish blue, and 4 purple rep tokens saved already spread across 4 different characters).

I downloaded it again once it went F2P, and played for a day on my old lvl 50 BH, but got bored again and un-installed. I really wanted to like this game, especially after playing beta and pre-ordering, but once you get 50 the game gets dull.

Sure you can do the story, but that's basically it.

Here's the limitations. I'm not including common ones like character, race, and inventory limit.

No bank.

One tradeskill.

Higher respec costs. Wtf?

No raids.

5 Warzones per week.

Only full rewards from 3 Flashpoints per week.

Three space missions per week.

No emergency fleet pass.

Longer quick travel cool down.

Later level for mounts. Wtf?

Can only revive if you die 5 times in the zone at a med center. Wtf?

Increased vendor prices. Wtf?

Takes longer to gain exp. Wtf?

No rest exp.

Takes longer to gain valor levels.

GUI quickslot limitations. GUI limitations? Seriously?

I don't know about you, but with such severe limitations. The game is pretty much unenjoyable as a F2P.

Let's compare that to EQ2's free to play. Again I'm not including the common ones to the F2P model.

Can't get the full specialization points.

Adept spell tier.

That's about it. EQ2 pretty much lets you play and enjoy the entire game. They don't gimp you on stuff costing more, exp gain taking longer, mount levels, number of dungeons and raids you can do, etc. I've never seen a F2P model (well maybe except the Asian ones) that limit and punish you in so many ways.

My thoughts exactly, SWTOR is basically the worst F2P model ever implemented. Not even worth the 20GB+ download size.

My thoughts exactly, SWTOR is basically the worst F2P model ever implemented. Not even worth the 20GB+ download size.

Exactly this, it seems that when you reach the level cap you must subscribeto have something to do, the worst F2P model I've ever seen. And think that it was worse at the F2P launch, there were more restrictions than those.

as a free player there's more than enough to do, far more than in the free version of say WoW.. oh wait... all those limitations are pretty common. and if you play so much you reach level cap and run out of the daily allowance of raids and what not. well then you pretty much play enough that the game is worth the pitiful monthly sum.

Yeah the game is playable as f2p but not as enjoyable, being reminded every time you gain experience that you are gaining it at a slower rate and being limited in pvp and space missions just annoys the shiz outta me. But hey its better than nothing with the few toons I had and can still access easy enough to swap around them to get my sw fix when needed.

I don't think any of these f2p models got it right though, I think the GW2 model is the most effective. TsW is pretty good with theirs as well, in the sense that with TsW or GW2 I dont feel my experience is being hamstrung or forced into paying

Yeah the game is playable as f2p but not as enjoyable, being reminded every time you gain experience that you are gaining it at a slower rate and being limited in pvp and space missions just annoys the shiz outta me. But hey its better than nothing with the few toons I had and can still access easy enough to swap around them to get my sw fix when needed.

I don't think any of these f2p models got it right though, I think the GW2 model is the most effective. TsW is pretty good with theirs as well, in the sense that with TsW or GW2 I dont feel my experience is being hamstrung or forced into paying

Actually, you're gainign XP at the same rate everyone did before F2P....

Actually, you're gainign XP at the same rate everyone did before F2P....

Hrmm I disagree with that, having levelled 2.5 toons to 50 in the before f2p days I've noticed since f2p you seem to have to do all the missions and bonus missions on a planet before you are levelled enough to move on. But anyway even if I accept your premise that its just a perception issue being reminded about it ad nausem still isnt the right approach imo.

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!