• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2011


Definitive Best Defragmenter 2011  

335 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Auslogic
      36
    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      0
    • Diskeeper
      21
    • JKDefrag
      11
    • Norton Speed Disk
      2
    • O&O Defrag
      26
    • PageDefrag
      0
    • Vopt
      1
    • Windows Defrag
      63
    • PerfectDisk
      74
    • Defraggler
      67
    • Smart Defrag
      9
    • Paragon Total Defrag
      1
    • Other (please specify)
      24


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Auslogic for a quick easy solution.

If you want a more thorough defragger then it has to be JKDefrag's successor, MyDefrag, but the supplied scripts may not be the best - look at the MyDefrag forums for better user scripts - I'm using one called 'System Disk Robust' that seems to keep my system disk fast but it will take ages on its first ever run as there's a lot of reorganising to do. The Windows7 tool is better than some but it's always slow doing the job.

  • 0

Nothing wrong with Windows 7 built in one, does the job fine for me.

The problem with it is, it doesn't show you much, people like to see that something was done.

Just doing it and saying it's finished doesn't please alot of people.

  • 0

The problem with it is, it doesn't show you much, people like to see that something was done.

Just doing it and saying it's finished doesn't please alot of people.

You mean people just like the blinking lights that show the files moving once you start the defrag. Don't worry, your secret is safe with me. :whistle:

I use Auslogics for daily quick defrags (fragments smaller than 10mb, usually takes less than a minute). Then I leave Windows 7 Defrag on its default schedule to run once a week.

Auslogics is the best I have used. Very light weight, minimalistic, and super fast.

  • 0

PerfectDisk Hands Down

the way a drive is suppose to look 24/7, I defrag my drives ever Morning at 1am and then have a daily back up to my server at 3 am.

no matter how hard you try windows SwapFile will alwazs leave some sort of fragment file behined unless u do a boot defrag on ever start up. As well as have the PageFile set with a min/max vaule at the same size.

post-342470-0-95871200-1300244381.jpg

  • 0

Ever since 2010, I couldn't be bothered defragmenting my hard drive anymore, I'm not sure why. I guess it's back to the question, does it really make a big of a difference? Especially since we have more and more powerful processor + DDR3, etc

  • 0

The thing I don't like about commercial defragmenters is that they aim for 100% performance. So they spend hours upon hours trying to keep your hard disk in perfect condition. Personally, I aim for maybe 90% performance. :p Auslogics does a quick defrag 6 days a week, and Win7 Defrag runs once a week. It never takes more than 10 minutes to defragment and my computer stays plenty fast.

  • 0

Built in Windows automatic defragmentation tool. I haven't even thought about defragmenting my disks ever since I installed Vista a couple months after launch. It comes setup to automatically defragment your drives. Windows 7 shows that it is scheduled for 1:00 AM every Wednesday. I see no point of installing extra software and actually having to worry about it when the built in one does its just perfectly.

  • 0

Well for paid defrag, so far, PD is the only one that does not delete my restore points, I have tried O&O 14, Diskeeper 2010.

For free defrag, Puran seems to delete my restore points too, Auslogic does a good job but lacks the boot time defrag. I've tried defraggler also but I found it made less impact on my laptop, the same goes with Iobit's Smart Defrag...

Diskeeper seems to be the one that made a noticeable impact on my system, in terms of speed and performance, but even in Volume Shadow Mode it deletes my restore points. I've even tried DK 2011 but still the problem persists for me.

In the end, I'm still in search for a good defrag software that could increase speed and performance the way DK does, without deleting my restore points. :blush:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!