• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2011


Definitive Best Defragmenter 2011  

335 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Auslogic
      36
    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      0
    • Diskeeper
      21
    • JKDefrag
      11
    • Norton Speed Disk
      2
    • O&O Defrag
      26
    • PageDefrag
      0
    • Vopt
      1
    • Windows Defrag
      63
    • PerfectDisk
      74
    • Defraggler
      67
    • Smart Defrag
      9
    • Paragon Total Defrag
      1
    • Other (please specify)
      24


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Windows7 does defrag by itself when it has nothing better to do (when idle)

why bother with some prehistoric software like defrags antiviruses and firewalls :)

i will disagree with the antivirus part. as it has a use still.

  • 0

I'm saying Auslogic. I was trying to install Linux on my laptop a while ago and I couldn't shrink my Windows partition any further (it was 222 GB, I wanted about 30 GB free for Linux). I tried defragging using Defraggler, but it wouldn't move any data to the front of the drive. I saw that some of the data it wouldn't move was in C:\Windows, so I rebooted into a WinPE environment and tried running it there, still no dice. I looked around on the internet and various forums said that Auslogic had a feature to move data to the front of the drive.

It also seemed to do a better job at defragging than Defraggler.

Oh, and it's free.

  • 0

PerfectDisk Hands Down

the way a drive is suppose to look 24/7, I defrag my drives ever Morning at 1am and then have a daily back up to my server at 3 am.

no matter how hard you try windows SwapFile will alwazs leave some sort of fragment file behined unless u do a boot defrag on ever start up. As well as have the PageFile set with a min/max vaule at the same size.

What version of PD is that as mine doesn't look like that :unsure:

Perfect disk 2011 for me after using Diskeeper and OnO I've found PD the best :cool:

  • 0

Mydefrag (which is free, by the way!)

The power of Mydefrag is just AMAZING - even compared to O&O and Perfectdisk. It provides you with a proper drive map without those nonsense clusters, has got around 12 different scripts (and you can even write your own ones pretty easy!), extremely lightweight (lwhole programm just 3.5MB) and actually works pretty damn well! Love it :rolleyes:

  • 0

+1 for Raxco Perfectdisk. The real difference is most defraggers do just that they "defrag" Raxco Perfect disk consolidates all your dat based on usage statistics that it compiles while you use your computer and moves it to the front of the drive, with the excepsion of unmovable system files. It will still do those with a boot time defrag. It also has an aggressinve defrag mode that takes the most used data and moves that to the front of the drive and leaves a small buffer between that and not so frequently used data to keep any defraged files close to the edge. This enables what is called short stroking where the HD heads have the least amount of movement to read data....Some deep reading on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_stroking%23cite_note-0 and http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/short-stroking-hdd%2c2157.html.

Now with Raxco Perfectdisk 12 it has more advanced algorithms which keep a closer eye on you usage statistics thus allowing for faster reads.

Thanks,

  • 0

Perfect disk does the job flawlessly

It does.

I use the server version, soon version 12 will be released, version 12 home has been.

I used O&O for sometime and it got worse since version 10, it crashes a lot and lags your system.

  • 0

Windows Vista and 7 does it in the background, as it should be. It's not something anyone should be concerned with or even know about and as for all the third party programs...placebos. I can't wait for SSDs to take over so defragmenting finally dies.

  • 0

I have read in adverts that Auslogics defrag will do a boot time defrag of the system files including the page file but for the life of me I cannot find any settings in it to do that. Has anyone else got it to do a boot time defrag? Sysinternals Pagedefrag does not work on Windows 7 and I have been using Smart Defrag 2 to defrag the system files for now. Does anyone know any good boot time defraggers?

BTW ignore my earlier post on Raxcos Perfect disk. I had a series of incidents with it that I would rather not talk about but I have currently sworn against it. Let me just say if you've upgraded to v.12 then you are a guinea pig or a beta tester at best.

Thanks,

  • 0

I have read in adverts that Auslogics defrag will do a boot time defrag of the system files including the page file but for the life of me I cannot find any settings in it to do that. Has anyone else got it to do a boot time defrag? Sysinternals Pagedefrag does not work on Windows 7 and I have been using Smart Defrag 2 to defrag the system files for now. Does anyone know any good boot time defraggers?

Defraggler and Puran Defrag have boot-time defrag. As for which is better, I have no idea.

  • 0

I pitted Auslogics , Defraggler, DirMS, Ultimate Defrag (DiskTrix) and UltraDefrag (GPL License) against one another, latest versions.

Ultradefrag was the speed winner, but amazingly, Ultimate Defrag used about 1/10 th the CPU time and almost no IO resources of the others, at least not showing up in Task Manager's process usage columns!

Ultimate Defrag appears to be the best for use while still performing other tasks.

Once defragged, I did not compare it with Buzzsaw.

RSD

  • 0

Hi,

OK I understand what a basic defragmentation program is supposed to do. That is take fragments of files that are out of place and put them together with the files they belong with. Some Defraggers even consolidate the data and move it all closer to the front of the drive, that is the optimization some talk about. But what about programs like PerfectDisk. I used to use PerfectDisk religiously until version 12. Now when I have it on it's like the 1000 pound gorilla in the room. Not only does it run 2 services but it has 2 programs running at all times in the background, PDAgent and PDEngine. Then it has this thing called Optiwrite which keeps working on your hard drive at all times to prevent fragmentation and Stealth defrag which is supposed to only run background defrag when the system is idle, but I found it working one time when I was doing a backup of the drive it was defragging.....NOT a good thing.

I have read that Diskeeper works in the same way. It's getting to the point where my system runs remarkably slower with programs like PerfectDisk installed.

I have been trying to stay away from huge bloated programs and I think the biggest time and resource hogs are my graphic editing tools and Express Web. But when they are closed, THEY ARE CLOSED and using NO resources.

Sorry to those who swear by PerfectDisk and Diskeeper but there seems to be a handful of reliable and fairly standalone free defraggers out there, with the exception of all the bells and whistles, do the exact same job. So what is still the attraction to the big bloated defraggers?

  • 0

So what is still the attraction to the big bloated defraggers?

A false sense of performance enhancement is what drives most to use 'bloated' defragmenting software. Keep in mind that the vast majority of the population couldn't point out the taskbar if you asked them to.

Defragging is redundant at best in modern operating systems, Windows 8 will bring such software to dwindle.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      137
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!