New HP Laptop with mismatched memory


Recommended Posts

SO I bought a new dv6t Quad Edition Laptop from HP with 12GB RAM. This thing is a beast, esp after I put in a SSD. However I am wanting to max the RAM out since I do a lot of virtualization work with VMware and because I can.

I opened up the bottom and discovered mismatched RAM. I downloaded CPUID just hoping maybe someone got lazy with the RAM stickers and it confirms my suspicion.

My 8GB stick is PC3-10700 (667MHz) and my 4GB is PC3-12800 (800 Mhz).

Would it be in my best interest to replace both to 12800 or just replace the 4GB to match the 8GB stick? Or should I get a hold of HP and pitch a fit to see if they will correct this. I am not trying to get any upgrade for free, but when I took my A+ a long time ago 10+ years, I could have sworn that mismatched RAM works but it was an avoid if you can thing.

Mods please move this to Hardware hangout... Thanks

I would just replace the 4 gig stick with another 8. I prefer my ram in matched pairs also, but in most cases it won't matter, they'll both clock down to their lowest common denominator speed and timings. You can run memtest86 to verify its all good.

It makes absolutly no difference that they're unmatched. I don't see anything for HP to 'correct'. If the laptop works at the advertised speed and with the advertised amount of RAM there's nothing wrong.

Yes there is a difference, one set of ram is running at a higher frequency than the other. You also have to factor in the timings for each of the sticks too.

I had a quick look on New Egg: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231530 Just have to check your laptop will support the faster spec ram. With a price that cheap, buy two just for peace of mind.

I think for me it would boil down to what was advertised. If the higher speed ram was on what was supposed to be there I would give them a call and see what happens. If the lower speed was supposed to be there then don't worry about it because the higher speed will clock down.

No harm no foul in calling them if they screwed up. If they were wrong and don't do anything I don't think you will be out much because the I think the performance would be hard to notice.

That being said, I would probably replace the slow ram to match the faster....I like the illusion of more speed :D

my hp laptop has mismatched ram (a 2gig and a 4gig). My guess is they have a brand of 1's, 2's, 4's, 8's. Not surprising really. As long as both are set to run at the same speed (they seem fairly close even if not) it makes no difference if they are identical or not. At work we build a lot of computers out of parts and as such we always have different ram (as it's pulled from scrap computers) and it gets mixed and matched and the computers have 0 problems.

I'd replace the 4gig to go up to 16, close it up, and run with it, you aren't going to do any damage, and as you have said it works perfectly well as is. No need to complicate/overreact to something that miniscule. But that's just my opinion.

Yes there is a difference, one set of ram is running at a higher frequency than the other. You also have to factor in the timings for each of the sticks too.

I had a quick look on New Egg: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16820231530 Just have to check your laptop will support the faster spec ram. With a price that cheap, buy two just for peace of mind.

No really there is not, one can clock faster than the other that is the only difference. The system, being as smart as it is, will slow down the faster memory to the slower memory and everything is now on an equal playing field. While one can go faster than the other, doesn't mean it is or allowed to by the system. This has been like this since way back in 286 and 386 computers.

  • Like 1

I bought a laptop that was advertised with having extra RAM. It was an offer from the store in which I bought it from and the ram was made by different manufacturers. No massive issue, it's compatible and it is the same timings/speed in my case.

I'd go with what others are saying, if some of the RAM is of a lower spec than what was advertised with the laptop, contact HP, if some of it is faster than advertised, that's a bonus and I doubt that they'll do anything about it. In that case, just buy some new ram that matches the fastest chip.

I believe with DDR3 the memory controller can handle mismatched RAM as long as the timings match up, but like was mentioned earlier the clock speeds are set at the slower speed. 667Mhz is a pretty low for a higher end laptop. My Compaq which was originally manufactured in 2007 is running at 1066Mhz(also DDR3). Personally I'd send them an email in the off chance it was an actual error and they send you a replacement stick at the 800Mhz. Else you could upgrade to 1066 but I believe that is the max(See PDF, link below).

Best practice recommends matching memory speeds as well as putting the larger size in the first slot for a reason. My laptop actually bugged out when I flipped the memory cards after doing a cleaning and replacing a broken LCD. They were both the same frequency, but one is 2GB and the other 1GB. It ran fine for a few seconds and then the colors went berserk. In an older Dell laptop I worked on someone had ran mismatched frequency RAM and the thing would boot and actually booted but it had so many glitches errors and random bluescreens. It was fine once I pulled wrong frequency RAM. Though it had more problems than just mismatched RAM.

http://h10032.www1.hp.com/ctg/Manual/c01860375.pdf

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!