Recommended Posts

Yahoo! CEO Marissa Mayer has decided that the company will no longer abide by its long-standing practice of using employees who telecommute to work each day.

Putting an end to pajama-clad employees working from the comfort of their own living rooms, the new policy is set to go into effect in June. News of the sea change was delivered in a memo sent by Jackie Reses, Yahoo!?s head of human resources.

?To become the absolute best place to work, communication and collaboration will be important, so we need to be working side-by-side,? the memo stated. ?That is why it is critical that we are all present in our offices. Some of the best decisions and insights come from hallway and cafeteria discussions, meeting new people, and impromptu team meetings.?

A source said to be familiar with Mayer?s decision to place a stop sign on the company?s telecommuting superhighway told Business Insider that employees had been abusing the privilege of working at home and that it was hurting productivity.

Mayer also came to the conclusion that forcing employees into the company?s offices would also thin Yahoo!?s bloated ranks, Business Insider reported, and bring it in line with other Silicon Valley tech firms that do not have nearly as many telecommuting employees.

more

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1138674-yahoo-ends-telecommuting/
Share on other sites

I would say, its not a good move. Companies like Yahoo can save big dollars on construction, leases and property taxes, since they may no longer need to build or rent larger offices or parking lots when they expand. Moreover, they can attract employees from a larger geography and retain top talent who?for whatever reason?can?t travel to the office every day.

This article explains telecommuting and what benefits telecommuting offers, and how cloud can effectively support remote employees:

http://www.dincloud.com/blog/what-is-telecommuting-and-how-cloud-supports-remote-employees

I've telecommuted for most of the last nine years and wouldn't change it at all. Beats the heck out of driving an hour to an hour and a half one way each day. With my kids, I'm able to see them more, even if it's just when I'm getting a refill of water or lunch. From my current and previous employers perspective, I've worked out great as a telecommuting employee because I continually produce at a high level, which sounds like was not the case for a lot of Yahoo employees.

On the flip side, not going to an office everyday (or at all in my case), does have some drawbacks. Some of Yahoo's reasons are perfectly valid, but conference calls and group or one on one IMs can accomplish a great deal.

We have a guy in our office who telecommutes one day a week, who just happens to be our head DBA (we're a software house). For that day, we pretty much presume he's skiving off for the day as it's a total waste of time trying to get him to do ANYthing. He's always either "too busy", or just doesn't answer on Communicator.

Seems to me that your job isn't very important if you can telecommute. ;)

Maybe you should telecommute from the dark ages to the the real modern world eh? ;)

I work from home (telecommuting is one of those modern phrases that really irks me) for a handful of Media organisations and so long as you have all the right software and guidelines in place, it works flawlessly. If Yahoo! really think they were having a problem then they really weren't doing it right in the first place.

Working from home = greater productivity and is more efficient both financially and in terms of work done.

For one thing working from home it's better for the environment. Less emissions. Also with this crappy move some people would have 1.5hr+ commutes! This move from yahoo,etc would also create more traffic nitemares and problems and also the roads are in bad shape. working from home would cut down on wear-n-tear on vehicles.

For another thing working from home allows more people to still work and support elderly parents, kids, etc. Cuts down on childcare costs massively (hey didn't the chick that runs yahoo now just have a baby so she should understand this).

It also enables people to have jobs that are very talented at what they do but can't move due to family stuff or being tied down to a property they can't sell or whatever.

Also some people are more creative at home. Designers can't get inspiration from bleak cubicles or drab offices. Developers would have more distractions in these open concept offices where there are tons of distractions as well as people wandering by your desk asking "do you like turtles?" "do you like chocolate milk" "oooh! what's that?" "what does this do?" "oh you need to blah blah blah"... every 10 minutes... would you be able to code an application a fortune 500 relies on or software that runs critical stuff in a crazy environment like that??

Poo Poo on yahoo for doing this. They are on the way out like myspace anyways.

For another thing working from home allows more people to still work and support elderly parents, kids, etc. Cuts down on childcare costs massively (hey didn't the chick that runs yahoo now just have a baby so she should understand this).

Your employer isn't paying you to look after kids or parents etc, they're paying you to work for them. if you're not, you're abusing the trust they put on you (and this is what a LOT of homeworkers do), and it's one of the main reasons why they're dropping it.

Also some people are more creative at home. Designers can't get inspiration from bleak cubicles or drab offices. Developers would have more distractions in these open concept offices where there are tons of distractions as well as people wandering by your desk asking "do you like turtles?" "do you like chocolate milk" "oooh! what's that?" "what does this do?" "oh you need to blah blah blah"... every 10 minutes... would you be able to code an application a fortune 500 relies on or software that runs critical stuff in a crazy environment like that??

Poo Poo on yahoo for doing this. They are on the way out like myspace anyways.

I work in an open plan office, for a software developer.. We have none of the "problems" you mention above. It's a largely quiet office where for the most part, people get on with their work. People do chat, but that's just normal and to be encouraged as everyone needs a few minutes downtime every now and then.

The one homeworker we have, who home works 1 day a week, we essentially consider him to just not be working that day.

^you could try being un-manned drone pilot operator,

if the equipment & secure comm.line available at your house,

telecommuting there is.

you would get a medal as well. and a state park named after you.

Your employer isn't paying you to look after kids or parents etc, they're paying you to work for them. if you're not, you're abusing the trust they put on you (and this is what a LOT of homeworkers do), and it's one of the main reasons why they're dropping it.

Took my other half ages to realise just because i was at home didn't mean i could go to the shop, look after the kid, do the cleaning etc.

A successful home worker is one that treats there working day the same as if they'd have commuted to an office.

I worked at home for IPS and I didn't let anything bother me. I shut the door, put on my noise cancelling headphones and went to work. Had enough snacks in the room to get me through the few hours I'd sit down and had a good playlist going and I was good to go for hours.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!