Recommended Posts

Steve Jobs? FBI File Released

The FBI has released, and posted on its web site, Steve Jobs' 191-page FBI file. Read it here. The file consists of a 1991 background investigation conducted when Jobs was being considered for an appointment to the President's Export Council in the Bush I White House, and records of a 1985 bomb threat against him.

We're still reading the files, but here's a taste, from a memo summarizing the background investigation:

Several individuals commented concerning past drug use on the part of Mr. Jobs.

Several individuals questioned Mr. Jobs' honesty stating that Mr. Jobs will twist the truth and distort reality in order to achieve his goals. They also commented that, in the past, Mr. Jobs was not supportive of [redacted] (the mother of his child born out of wedlock) and their daughter; however, recently has become supportive.

And this:

[Redacted] advised that he has been acquainted with Mr. Jobs since [redacted]. He characterized Mr. Jobs as a deceptive individual who who is not completely forthright and honest.

And:

[Redacted] advised that he is no longer friends with Mr. Jobs. He feels bitter toward and alienated by Mr. Jobs based on his association with Mr. Jobs at ACI. He characterized Mr. Jobs as an honest and trustworthy individual; however, his moral character is questionable.

And:

They further stated that Mr. Jobs has integrity as long as he gets his way.

And:

She stated she was somewhat reluctant to discuss the Appointee since she has questions concerning his ethics and his morality.

I've read the files from a lot of background FBI investigations; it's pretty rare in my experience that this much derogatory information gets dredged up. Often the agents only interview employers and people who are suggested by the candidate. It's obviously unclear who these quoted folks are, but if they were among the people Jobs referred the agents to, then he didn't know his friends very well.

In Jobs' defense, many of the people interviewed attested to his upstanding moral character. And even those who savaged him still recommended him for the appointment, which he didn't get. As one put it: "[H]e believed the Appointee has what it takes to assume a high level political position within the Government, which in his opinion, honesty and integrity are not prerequisites to assume such a position."

Another weird thing revealed in the file: Steve Jobs had a Top Secret security clearance. He received in 1988, and it was terminated in 1990. The records aren't clear as to why he needed it, but the "employing agency" associated with the clearance was Pixar.

Source: Gawker

View: FBI file on Steven Paul Jobs

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1057088-steve-jobs/
Share on other sites

My guess with the top-secret clearance is because Pixar did a lot of high-end research and development in processing and parallel-computing that would interest the military and scientific industry. All likelihood they were brought in as consultants on some supercomputer project or another.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1057088-steve-jobs/#findComment-594642996
Share on other sites

Not always true. Jobs was just a douche.

for example, another popular and very successful CEO is Warren Buffet, and he seems like a very nice good guy. so i guess it can go both ways. you can SCARE people into working as jobs seemed to have done, or you can make and inspire them to want to work and do a good job. I think the latter will provide better results.

Those are two completely different worlds. Jobs made his fortune by designing a product and competing head-to-head with Gates to build his empire.

Buffet built his empire by cashing in on insanely good investments. Buffet let his money to the work for him, while Jobs used his knowledge and wit to fight his way up. Two very different tactics.

Even so, I very much doubt that Buffet was always this gentle and kind person that he's seen to be today. I'm sure he's done his fair share of stomping on people on his way to the top.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1057088-steve-jobs/#findComment-594643054
Share on other sites

<Snipped>

My other question is... why did they release this? O.o

Specified in the article, Freedom of Information Act request, someone asked, and the government had no good reason to say no. It's the law, at least when Democrats are in the white house.

Clinton had that policy when I was working in DoD. Bush's policy on FOIA was to redact everything and drag your feet on FOIA requests and make them take you to court if they wanted anything. We literally got that memo when he came into office.

Edited by Anaron
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1057088-steve-jobs/#findComment-594643522
Share on other sites

" Mr. Jobs will twist the truth and distort reality in order to achieve his goals"

Jobs? gawd, I never once saw him doing that on stage during a Apple press event..... never not once

as for Pixar, you know some of the national labs used Pixar's technology to do simulations of nuclear stuff and such.... would be one reason why he needed a TS clearance. Pixar was a 3D software company before they where in the movie business

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1057088-steve-jobs/#findComment-594643558
Share on other sites

Specified in the article, Freedom of Information Act request, someone asked, and the government had no good reason to say no. It's the law, at least when Democrats are in the white house.

Clinton had that policy when I was working in DoD. Bush's policy on FOIA was to redact everything and drag your feet on FOIA requests and make them take you to court if they wanted anything. We literally got that memo when he came into office.

Oh... well I thought FOIA required some sort of reason to make a request "ok" but I guess I was wrong.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1057088-steve-jobs/#findComment-594643562
Share on other sites

Oh... well I thought FOIA required some sort of reason to make a request "ok" but I guess I was wrong.

Nope. The government theoretically needs a reason to tell you no. You can ask for anything you want, but you have to pay the cost for accessing and copying the data.

Most states and localities have similar "open meetings" or "open records" laws.

Exceptions (per wikipedia because I'm lazy):

  1. (A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and (B) are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order;[4]
  2. related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency;[4]
  3. specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (other than section 552b of this title), provided that such statute (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue, or (B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld;[4] FOIA Exemption 3 Statutes
  4. trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential;[4]
  5. inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency;[4]
  6. personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;[4]
  7. records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information (A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, (B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, © could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, (D) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source, (E) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or (F) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual;[4]
  8. contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions;[4] or
  9. geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.[4]

6 and 7 might have reasonably prevented release while Steve Jobs was alive, but now he's dead, so no reason not to release it.

Everyone knows Steve Jobs was a pothead when he worked for Atari anyway.

Seriously, what's with all the police haters in Neowin? This topic isn't even about something bad... Every time I see a comment like this, I imagine the poster as either a) a criminal, or b) ignorant hood trash.

Good question, it's not like the FBI had a file on him for no reason or considered him an enemy of the state, he was suggested to have a government appointed office and they investigated him to see if he had some kind of background issues. It's pretty routine. Mostly the info in the government background checks won't disqualify you unless it shows you lied about something in your application. Usually it's to ensure they know everything that could possibly be held against you.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1057088-steve-jobs/#findComment-594643588
Share on other sites

Good question, it's not like the FBI had a file on him for no reason or considered him an enemy of the state, he was suggested to have a government appointed office and they investigated him to see if he had some kind of background issues. It's pretty routine. Mostly the info in the government background checks won't disqualify you unless it shows you lied about something in your application. Usually it's to ensure they know everything that could possibly be held against you.

People like you and I realize that, but for whatever reason, we have posters who's hatred for cops is so deep-rooted and irrational, they'll just spew garbage wherever they can, regardless of how irrelevant it is. I find it REALLY odd.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1057088-steve-jobs/#findComment-594643604
Share on other sites

First off, these comments here about **** the FBI, or FBI are idiots should be removed. They are troll posts and serve no purpose.

With that said, this is standard practice when people are considered for high end government positions. Its not like the FBI was looking for dirt on jobs just because they had nothing better to do. My sister was once considered for a job with the CIA and several members of my family were interviewed as well as an Uncle who works with the government and has high level top secrete clearance. So the FBI will dig through your life to make sure you pose no threat to them, or the country. Jobs is no exception.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1057088-steve-jobs/#findComment-594643678
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!