Teenager Hospitalized After Playing Video Games For 4 Straight Days


Recommended Posts

COLUMBUS, Ohio (CBS Cleveland) ? A 15-year-old Columbus boy was hospitalized for dehydration after locking himself in his room to play an Xbox game for four consecutive days.

WCMH-TV reports that Tyler Rigby collapsed and was rushed to the hospital Tuesday after a ?Modern Warfare 3? marathon that left him severely dehydrated.

?It?s like he was looking at me but he wasn?t there. It was like he was looking through me,? Jennifer Thompson, Tyler?s aunt, told WCMH. ?We were talking and I heard a thump and I looked over and he just fell.?

Jessie Rawlins, Tyler?s mom, said he came out of his bedroom to eat a snack or use the bathroom.

?I was very scared. I thought he was going to die,? Rawlins told the station. ?He just fell over three times.?

Tyler is expected to be OK after medics pumped his body full of fluids, but he won?t be playing video games anytime soon.

?The Xbox is gone,? Rawlins told the station.

Almost seems impossible to play a game for 4 days. I've had pretty long marathons, but nothing like this.

That's some super parenting there. When I was a kid I didn't get to sit in my room playing games all day. I had chores to do and I was expected to be at the dinner table to eat with everyone else. Who just let's their kid lock themselves away in their room for days at a time? At least they got rid of the Xbox, kid obviously has some serious issues if he can't stop playing a game long enough to get a drink of water or eat.

he had the tea and was hooked to the B.R.A.I.D. It's impossible to leave sometimes. that wasn't no xbox... that's what all moms call game devices they don't understand.

wow this kid sucks and IMO deserves it if you cannot marathon it and keep your self alive while doing so... then dont do it, what an idiot I have had loads of gaming marathons but my longest marathon was for PHP coding I stayed up for 9 days straight working on a clients website by the end of it i could not talk (i just slurred my words and spoke jibberish) but i was alive

I don't blame the parents or the xbox.. It's summer vacation..

When I was that age I would say up days straight without sleep just cause I could.. at 15 you need to know your own limits.

I'll just say what i said elsewhere on this:

Eh, would've been better if he didn't survive tbh. Any decrease in the population of the obviously stupid people is a good thing after all.

  • Like 1

I'll just say what i said elsewhere on this:

Eh, would've been better if he didn't survive tbh. Any decrease in the population of the obviously stupid people is a good thing after all.

If everyone who did something stupid when they were young died, our species wouldn't last another generation.

Don't blame on the game. It's your fault that you don't pay attention to your son. He should be taken away from them for being bad parents.

He's 15. Hardly an age that requires parental supervision.

He is 15.

Is not unusual for people 1 year older to be looking after themselves. You wouldn't have to expect to feed a 15 year old, you assume he would rink water and eat when needed. The parents may very well tried to go in but shouted off by the kid. They probably might assume that the kid went outside while they worked or he slept when everyone slept.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!