Buggati Veyron video 0 - 210 mph in cockpit cam


Recommended Posts

This car is so sexy. Friggin amazing. :woot:

http://videos.streetfire.net/Player.aspx?f...C4697F9A297&p=0

lots of nice video's on that site also.

here's a direct link to the video only.

http://videos.streetfire.net/iPlayer.aspx?...0B-9C4697F9A297

A different Video of testing on what looks like NURBURG Ring (pretty good video)

http://movies.autoexpress.co.uk/autoexpres...atti_veyron.mov

French Video review and test runs.

mms://stream1.m6.fr.ipercast.net/m6.fr/d/05/11/18/d051118102100SIRAS9220100.wmv

http://turbo.m6.fr/cms/display.jsp?id=p2_75774

Another video of track testing.

http://www.fungod.com/coppermine/displayim...album=15&pos=95

VITAL STATISTICS

Model Bugatti Veyron 16.4

Engine 7993cc, 16 cylinders in a W

Power 1001bhp @ 6000rpm

Torque 922 lb ft @ 2200rpm

Transmission 7-speed DSG, manual and auto

Fuel 11.7mpg (combined)

CO2 574g/km

Acceleration 0-62mph: 2.5sec

Top speed 253mph

Price ?810,345

Rating Five stars

Verdict Deserves 12 stars. Simply as good — and as fast — as it gets

Channel4 UK review and test drive in snow conditions. nice drifting in the snow....Also a great photo spread of the car.>

http://www.channel4.com/4car/road-tests/dr...tti/veyron.html

05-veyron-dust-f-a.jpg

05-veyron-close-s-a.jpg

05-veyron-eng-det.jpg

05-veyron-spoiler-det.jpg

Jeremy Clarkson Times Online Review (TopGear Host) Nov. 27th 2005>

http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/article/0...90873_1,00.html

Another Review from Edmunds

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Featu...icleId=108032#4

Edited by Tech001101

A nice Edmunds video of the orginal blue veyron.

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Featu...rticleId=106995

History of Bugatti and the plans for the new veyron in 2006 with footage.

http://www2.lemonzoo.com/_mov/lemonzoo_wmv...ARRRRRCCCAD.wmv

Edited by Tech001101

Jeremy Clarkson Written Review

http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/article/0...90873_1,00.html

"But once you go past 200mph it isn?t just the suspension and the tyres you have to worry about. The biggest problem is the air. At 100mph it?s relaxed. At 150mph it?s a breeze. But at 200mph it has sufficient power to lift an 800,000lb jumbo jet off the ground. A 200mph gust of wind is strong enough to knock down an entire city. So getting a car to behave itself in conditions like these is tough.

At 200mph you can feel the front of the car getting light as it starts to lift. As a result you start to lose your steering, so you aren?t even able to steer round whatever it is you can?t see because of the vibrations. Make no mistake, 200mph is at the limit of what man can do right now. Which is why the new Bugatti Veyron is worthy of some industrial strength genuflection. Because it can do 252mph. And that?s just mad ? 252mph means that in straight and level flight this car is as near as makes no difference as fast as a HawkerYou might point out at this juncture that the McLaren F1 could top 240mph, but at that speed it was pretty much out of control. And anyway it really isn?t in the same league as the Bugatti. In a drag race you could let the McLaren get to 120mph before setting off in the Veyron. And you?d still get to 200mph first. The Bugatti is way, way faster than anything else the roads have seen.ads have seen."

The TOPGEAR Episode on the Veyron is on mininova. 700 mb. wow!

http://www.mininova.org/tor/174930

Too bad its pwned by the Saleen S7 1000BHP model....

Faster acceleration, similar top speed .... a million (dollars?) less in price

oh and better handeling due to being 500kg's lighter

But sure... its a nice car if you got a nice fat bank account

note that 1000bhp isn't so hard to achieve you can get that much power from a corvette or a dodge viper... but they are not even close to the technology of this car, producing power is one thing but using it a something totally diffrent

Edited by Beastage

You guys might find this an interesting read:

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/bugatti.htm

It's all about how the veyron manages to achieve 1001BHP

Edit: Another interesting thing to note is that each car costs about 5mil to produce, yet they sell them for 1/5th of that. This is purely a technology showoff and was described by Jeremy Clarkson as the concorde of automobile history. We are unlikely to see anything surpass this in the near future the way the environment is going.

Edited by Axel
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!