Windows 7 flashy startup animation increases your boot


Recommended Posts

Something about that Windows 7 start-up animation that bugs me. I have this feeling that the startup process will not go any farther until that flashy little thing swirls around the screen and comes together. With XP and vista if you had a fast ssd the loading bar would be there for a few seconds and then blink its gone. I feel that with Windows 7 you have to wait for that animation to appear.

Then master2k27 recommended turning off the GUI boot. So I did.

the result?

From the moment I press enter on "normal startup, until I get a cursor on the black screen"

SSD Laptop

With the GUI turned on 20.56 seconds

With the GUI turned off 16.53 seconds.

i7 920

With GUI - 41.81 seconds

Without GUI 34.47 seconds.

Try it for yourself.

To turn off the GUI boot go into Msconfig and click on the boot tab. Then check "No GUI boot". Though I prefer you time your startup time first before you turn it off so you have something to compare it to.

The method I used to time both boot times is this.

I first get the advanced startup menu up by pressing f8. I then select boot normally. I then put one finger on my watch and another on the enter key and press then both at the same time.

Edited by warwagon
there is an option in windows for non GUI boot. forgot where :p

Wonder if it helps, and ya I know what you are referring too. I think its under msconfig. I should try it and time the boots.

Yeah, you can do a non-gui boot through msconfig (on the startup tab). The only problem with this (which hesitates me from doing it) is you will not see any error screens either if it hangs/pauses. But then again, I've never had any problems period so... I suppose I should do it too!

Yeah I've thought that too. My hard drive isn't consistently doing anything until the animation starts, so I'm wondering if they could save a bit of time in there somewhere.

Edit: Interesting, I timed both disabled and enabled GUI-boot options, and the non-GUI boot was about 2 seconds faster.

Edited by Raikou Tch
Something about that Windows 7 start-up animation that bugs me. I have this feeling that the startup process will not go any farther until that flashy little thing swirls around the screen and comes together. With XP and vista if you had a fast ssd the loading bar would be there for a few seconds and then blink its gone. I feel that with Windows 7 you have to wait for that animation to appear.

You should read the Windows 7 blog about that animation; they actually changed its function and from where it runs in order to make sure there was no hesitation in it, but I doubt very very seriously that it slows the actual start up down. I've deleted the RSS feed from my bookmarks, but I'm sure if you do a Google search for Engineering Windows 7 you'll find it. It was pretty interesting. But I don't think it slows anything down. Remember in Vista, you had the loading bar, but then after that you had the glowing orb before the logon screen? There's no more orb in 7, it's straight to the logon screen from the 'Starting Windows' page. I would time it and see if there is a difference in boot times without it.

Wonder if it helps, and ya I know what you are referring too. I think its under msconfig. I should try it and time the boots.

Ok I just tested it.

On my SSD Laptop.

From the moment I press enter on "normal startup, until I get a cursor on the black screen"

With the GUI turned on 20.56 seconds

With the GUI turned off 16.53 seconds.

Now i'm going to test it on my i7 920 ... brb

There's a chance that it could be the BIOS fault for the hanging times before the animation starts up. However, the Windows animation is always there for the same amount of time on all the computers in my house and it's the blank screen's time that varies.

I've deleted the RSS feed from my bookmarks, but I'm sure if you do a Google search for Engineering Windows 7 you'll find it.

Here they are...

http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2008/08/2...erformance.aspx

http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2009/02/1...-animation.aspx

There's a chance that it could be the BIOS fault for the hanging times before the animation starts up. However, the Windows animation is always there for the same amount of time on all the computers in my house and it's the blank screen's time that varies.

No, I don't think he means the entire bootscreen is lagging... It starts by saying "Starting Windows" and then 5 seconds later or whatever, it does that animation. It's a "feature" :-P

But wow, the bootscreen cut 4 seconds off. Nice. I should try this...

No, I don't think he means the entire bootscreen is lagging... It starts by saying "Starting Windows" and then 5 seconds later or whatever, it does that animation. It's a "feature" :-P

But wow, the bootscreen cut 4 seconds off. Nice. I should try this...

Oh no, I got that hahaha. :p

I didn't mean to convey that it was actually "hanging". I was just referring to the black screen that said "Starting Windows". I was trying to figure out if Windows was actually loading any files during the "empty" screen.

I guess I forgot what the boot screen looked like cause I forgot that text was there before the logo showed up.

OK the results on my i7 920 computer. From the time I press enter on boot normally until I see a white cursor

With GUI - 41.81 seconds

Without GUI 34.47 seconds.

I want other people in this thread to also try this and post your results.

OK the results on my i7 920 computer. From the time I press enter on boot normally until I see a white cursor

With GUI - 41.81 seconds

Without GUI 34.47 seconds.

I want other people in this thread to also try this and post your results.

wow.... okay, that inspires me to try it now.

wow that is a big diffrance.

why do we even need to see the logo its at the bottom right of my desktop

?

OK the results on my i7 920 computer. From the time I press enter on boot normally until I see a white cursor

With GUI - 41.81 seconds

Without GUI 34.47 seconds.

I want other people in this thread to also try this and post your results.

Interesting... how are you measuring the start-up time?

Interesting... how are you measuring the start-up time?

I first get the advanced startup menu up by pressing f8. I then select boot normally. I then put one finger on my watch and another on the enter key and press then both at the same time.

Time till white cursor at welcome screen (from the power button on a dell laptop):

with gui - 23 seconds

without gui (try #1) - 29 seconds

without guy (try #2) - 20 seconds

um.... lol. well, in conclusion, my computer isn't very consistent. perhaps it was getting used to the change the first try? either way, i think i can wait 3 extra seconds to see the animation. it's worth it :p

I first get the advanced startup menu up by pressing f8. I then select boot normally. I then put one finger on my watch and another on the enter key and press then both at the same time.

Have you tried any tests with windows sounds? I'm sure with boot and login sounds disabled it's quicker. Maybe it's placebo though. I don't want to reboot to test it though :p

Time till white cursor at welcome screen (from the power button on a dell laptop):

with gui - 23 seconds

without gui (try #1) - 29 seconds

without guy (try #2) - 20 seconds

um.... lol. well, in conclusion, my computer isn't very consistent. perhaps it was getting used to the change the first try? either way, i think i can wait 3 extra seconds to see the animation. it's worth it :p

Upon my 2nd reboot test on my i7 the no gui was even faster yet. :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!