Swapping chicken pox-infected lollipops illegal


Recommended Posts

WTF :s

NASHVILLE (Reuters) - A federal prosecutor is warning parents against trading chicken pox-laced lollipops by mail in what authorities describe as misguided attempts to expose their children to the virus to build immunity later in life.

The warning came after media reports surfaced about a multi-state ring of parents, wary of vaccinations that prevent the disease, who were swapping lollipops licked by a sick child in a modern day incarnation of a chicken pox party.

In those so-called parties, parents purposely put sick children together with healthy children in order to spread the ailment and build immunity without having the children vaccinated. This new form of party shares the disease anonymously and long-distance.

"Sending a virus or disease through the U.S. mail (and private carriers) is illegal. It doesn't matter if it crosses state lines," said David Boling, public information officer for the Attorney in Nashville.

"Also, it is against federal law to adulterate or tamper with consumer products, such as candy."

Boling said the issue came to light after a television "news report out of Phoenix that involved a Nashville woman that was shipping and receiving adulterated products."

Sending chicken pox-infected lollipops, swabs or vials of saliva to parents who want to infect their children and avoid vaccinations is not only illegal, it can be lethal, said Dr. Tim Jones, Tennessee's state epidemiologist.

"They are putting at risk the people around them," said Jones, commenting on a controversy that has sparked anger in both the medical and legal communities.

An epidemiologist for the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta agrees. "It's an incredibly bad idea for a variety of reasons," said Dr. Rafael Harpaz, of the CDC's Division of Viral Diseases.

The transport and sale of contaminated items has been linked to a Facebook group called "Find a Pox Party in Your Area," which helps people anonymously arrange for the swapping and sale of contaminated items.

"There are a substantial number of people involved in it," Boling said, referring to the ring.

Nashville-based U.S. Attorney Jerry Martin has been outspoken on the matter because he wants to warn "folks that want to continue to engage in this kind of activity that they are certainly exposing themselves to criminal prosecution," said Boling, who would "neither confirm (nor) deny existence of an investigation."

POX PARTIES

Jones said old-fashioned "pox parties" were bad enough, but shipping items to infect children "is utterly inexcusable. In this case, these are people who are buying and selling infected or contaminated body fluids from complete strangers."

"There are a bunch of things wrong with this," he said, adding that parents could also be inadvertently giving their children items contaminated with influenza or hepatitis, in addition to chicken pox.

CDC's Harpaz said one major issue is that giving children the chicken pox instead of a vaccine could be a fatal mistake.

"Before the vaccine was licensed, there were in the order of 100 kids (in the U.S.) who died of chicken pox per year. Now there are very few among vaccinated children... It's kind of like playing Russian roulette with your child."

In addition to exposing children to chicken pox, those who have it are more susceptible to getting shingles later in life than are vaccinated children, Harpaz said.

"The idea that it's safer to give your kid the infection than it is to immunize them is just wrong, completely misguided and puts your child at unnecessary risk," said Tennessee epidemiologist Jones.

First of all, he said, the vaccine is safe, while those who give the children the disease "are putting at risk people around them. There may be people they could infect that don't have a choice, who can't take the vaccine."

The CDC's Harpaz said symptoms of chicken pox aren't noticeable for "10 days to 21 days when you are exposed." But that doesn't mean children aren't contagious.

Children taking chemotherapy or other medications that affect the immune system are among those who can't take the vaccine and would be at risk if exposed to infected children.

"You could infect them and kill them," said Jones. "That's murder."

http://news.yahoo.com/swapping-chicken-pox-infected-lollipops-illegal-200633795.html

I'm not sure if it's child abuse and it seems like the ban on posting the virus through the mail is (quite rightly) designed to protect adults who may not be immune.

By way of comparison, the vaccine isn't routinely administered to children here in the UK because it's not considered necessary. Most children contract the virus naturally (or through the sort of "parties" mentioned above) and it's not that big a deal. Here's the official guidance:

http://www.nhs.uk/chq/pages/1032.aspx?categoryid=62&subcategoryid=63

Although I hope the parents involved had the best of intentions, it does seem stupid to be deliberately sending viruses in the mail.

  • Like 1

I`m sure people over here (UK) have chicken pox parties - not child abuse at all, but if your child does not catch it when they are young, and catch it in adult life, it can be extremely dangerous to them.

So exposing them early on gets it out of the way - but letting your kid suck a lollipop you got in the mail that some other kid(s) had already been slavering all over is pretty rank

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...

All thanks to one or two stupid reports that "prove" vaccinations are bad for your child, and have a chance of causing autism.

Since then, no matter how many reports have come out that completely dismantle the previous ones, droves of retarded, paranoid parents subject their kids to "chicken pox parties" and stuff like this, so that they don't have to get the vaccine.

Yay for human stupidity.

Huh?

You guys are kidding me right?

I had chicken pox when I was a kid, hell millions of people have been having pox-parties for decades in the UK and I suspect the majority are for the better now. While I agree posting lollies is a bad way to do it, exposing children to the virus when they are young (when most kids get it anyway!) could very well save their life in the future.

Do you guys even know how dangerous chicken-pox is for adults?

If they have a vaccine these days then that is great no need to infect kids with pox-parties. I am sure when I was a id, the only vaccination was to get the infection. However, reports will always find a link. If you look at data hard enough, you can find a link with anything.

This is a great example of the state telling people how to run their lives and how to parent properly. The best parenting advice comes from your own parents.

Let's look at this another way... kids in the 1900's were fairly good. Kids in 2000 aren't that great.

The more governments stick their noses in, the worse society gets. Sometimes they get it right, sometimes... not quite so.

This will still go on regardless of what the law is, so now makes the government look like they have little power.

Please Note: I am from the UK. Post number 4 explains how our culture is.

How dare you Mr Spoon don't you know that making kids sick is bad. How dare you advocate the harming of our little kiddiewinks.

Even if their immune system can deal with it much better and getting it as an adult could leave you scarred and infertile and dead and other consequences kids aren't at risk of.

How dare you use a reasoned argument like this. Won't someone please think of the children and their poor little fevered brows.

All the parents who protect Junior will be in for a shock. When the kids grow up they can either get is adults and end up infertile or dead. Alternatively they may even have kids, catch it off them and then end up dead. Leaving their grandchildren parent less.

Yes much better than making a few kids sick.

All thanks to one or two stupid reports that "prove" vaccinations are bad for your child, and have a chance of causing autism.

Since then, no matter how many reports have come out that completely dismantle the previous ones, droves of retarded, paranoid parents subject their kids to "chicken pox parties" and stuff like this, so that they don't have to get the vaccine.

Yay for human stupidity.

Oh and vaccines can be bad for anyone. Every government puts aside money to cover vaccine damage claims (read up on this to find out more). However the risk of this is much, much, much less than the risks from the disease in question. Otherwise why bother to vaccinate. Unfortunately stupid parents use this kind of thing (and the whole autism stuff) as an argument against vaccinations as a whole.

However they will all soon die from diseases everyone else is vaccinated against. So it will all work out.

  • Like 1

I`m sure people over here (UK) have chicken pox parties - not child abuse at all, but if your child does not catch it when they are young, and catch it in adult life, it can be extremely dangerous to them.

So exposing them early on gets it out of the way - but letting your kid suck a lollipop you got in the mail that some other kid(s) had already been slavering all over is pretty rank

The problem is that there is really no reason to not get the vacination.

Giving kids chicken pox is NOT a good idea. Besides the illness itself they can end up with scarring, a small percentage die, and later in life up to 20% can develop a painful disorder called shingles - a reactivation of the virus which has been hiding in the nervous system. Getting the vaccine is a far better way to go.

You only get tiny scars if you pop or burst the pox :p

I have a few on my body but they aren't really noticable.

Strange how different our cultures are. I'm starting to see it more and more these days what with the cash machine post and now this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
    • NTLite 2026.06.11200 by Razvan Serea NTLite is a Windows configuration tool that allows you to modify your existing Windows install or an image yet to be deployed, remove Windows components, configure and integrate, speed up the Windows deployment process. Reduce Windows footprint on your RAM and storage drive memory. Remove components of your choice, guarded by compatibility safety mechanisms, which speed up finding that sweet spot. Windows Unattended feature support, providing many commonly used options on a single page for easy setup. Easily integrate a single or multiple drivers, update or language packages. Package integration features smart sorting, enabling you to seamlessly add packages for integration and the tool will apply them in the appropriate order, keeping hotfix compatibility in check. One of the important new features of NTLite (compared to its predecessors) is the ability to modify an already installed the operating system, by removing unnecessary components. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8.1 and 7, x86 and x64, live and image. Server editions of the same versions, excluding support for component removals and feature configuration. ARM64 image support in the alpha stage. Does not support Checked/Debug, Embedded, IoT editions, nor Vista or XP. NTLite 2026.06.11200 changelog: New Secure Boot Migration support: Verification, certificate staging, and boot-manager/sector update across the Image, Updates, Apply, and Create-ISO pages (2023 CA migration, optional 2011 revocation, Anti-rollback, Boot sector choice etc) Secure Boot Host Readiness: Live host Secure Boot migration monitor and Servicing-task control Option under Image page - C:\Windows row, or load the host as the target - Updates - Secure Boot Image: 'Sort mounted images first' option for the image list in Menu-Settings UI: Hover description card for Components and Unattended pages, selectable text and quick access to Compatibility options Command line: Relay commands into the already-running instance Enables controlling already running NTLite via ntlite.exe Use /NewInstance to launch an additional instance using CLI operations (premium) UI: 'New instance' option via main menu instead of a secondary ntlite.exe prompt Apply: Hide individual Apply-page notes with a per-note dismiss (X), critical excluded Settings: 'Unsigned RDP file launch warnings' tweak (RDP client), bypassing the April 2026 security-update prompt on RDP connections Upgrade Image: Live OS and deployed image editing now unlocked on free/test licenses, same licensing as images Image: 'Recompress' option in manual dialog Remove Editions to shrink the WIM in one session Image: SWM part size set inline on the Apply page and image dialogs, split-size popup retired Image: Relative 'Last change' dates; editions grouped by build time to reduce noise Image: 'Forget - Missing' on the Edit-cache menu to mass drop entries whose folder is gone Components: Root groups reorganized - user-facing groups first, system/critical last Components: Show filter options to view components by Template or App-type, since Apps are now merged into groups Presets: Delete confirmation now lists the multi-selected preset names UI: Design update propagated to the rest of the tool UI: Filter and search match words in any order and partially, better results filtering Components Unattended: Input-locale language derives from the user locale, with an independent keyboard picker, enables combinations previously unavailable Unattended: Input-locale now allows for a user value override Unattended: Localization OOBE WinPE now can be copied with the new WinPE Copy OOBE localization toggle, enter locale settings once for both stages Updates: Downloader greys and locks updates the image already carries (hotfix and MSIX) Updates: Resume interrupted update downloads Command line: Many upgrades, see /?, now prints help to the console or redirected output UI-Translation: Finnish language added, also thanks for Chinese Traditional (Matt), French (tistou77), Italian (clarensio), Russian (RDS), Swedish (1FF), Vietnamese (Vu Anh Vu) Fix Components: Containers removal breaking Apps deployment Components: Microsoft Account had leftovers when Easy Migrate is kept Image: Export to an existing WIM improvements, Append renamed to Merge Image: Improved 26H1 live removal support Image: No more 'X:\ not accessible' popup for certain drives during image scan Presets: Manual image refresh picks up presets added/removed outside the app Tweaks: Disabled visual-effect animations no longer return after first logon on a new profile Tweaks: Live Visual Effects toggles (animations, drag full windows, font smoothing) now apply correctly Download: NTLite 2026.06.11200 | 20.5 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Link: NTLite Home Page | NTLite Features | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Ah. La Fontana De Incontinentia ! Bella ! Bella !
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      257
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      93
    5. 5
      macoman
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!