Recommended Posts

Improved security, improved file transfer, better management of updates, will be supported for longer than 7, native USB 3 support, support for UEFI (Secure Boot), if you have a pendrive over 16GB you can carry your entire PC around with you and simply plug it into someone elses.

You mean fix file transfer which is broken since WIndows XP?

Native USB3 support is coming with Windows 7 SP2.

Improved Security like what?

Management Updates like what?

Support for UEFI (Secure Boot) , not essential

Same for Pendrive thing.

Being supported longer than Windows 7 is quite irrelevant.

I am just being real....

I agree. It doesn't work unless you have a touch screen pc which the majority do not have so is more a hastle than anything else

did u use windows 8(not developer preview coz its only for developers to develop metro apps and its not even close to feature complete) ??

if not stfu till its release

You mean fix file transfer which is broken since WIndows XP?

Native USB3 support is coming with Windows 7 SP2.

Improved Security like what?

Management Updates like what?

Support for UEFI (Secure Boot) , not essential

Same for Pendrive thing.

Being supported longer than Windows 7 is quite irrelevant.

I am just being real....

- WinRT apps can not have admin access so you won't have to worry about viri and malware when using WinRT apps.

- Updates are handled through the store so you won't need every program to have it's own update mechanism running in the background.

- Secure boot is very essential. It could kill off rootkits.

- You'll also have the ability to mount ISOs

- MSE is being merged with Defender and will be integrated into the OS

- Notification system

- Greatly improved task manager

- The OS in general is supposed to be lighter

They haven't even shown off the finished product so there will be more stuff in there.

- WinRT apps can not have admin access so you won't have to worry about viri and malware when using WinRT apps.

- Updates are handled through the store so you won't need every program to have it's own update mechanism running in the background.

- Secure boot is very essential. It could kill off rootkits.

- You'll also have the ability to mount ISOs

- MSE is being merged with Defender and will be integrated into the OS

- Notification system

- Greatly improved task manager

- The OS in general is supposed to be lighter

They haven't even shown off the finished product so there will be more stuff in there.

Some apps require Admin access but we will see how that all words. Updates apply only to apps you got through the story which is not applicable for most apps installed in PC. Mounting ISO is a nice thing. MSE bleh, is this gonna be optional to remove?

Some apps require Admin access but we will see how that all words. Updates apply only to apps you got through the story which is not applicable for most apps installed in PC. Mounting ISO is a nice thing. MSE bleh, is this gonna be optional to remove?

No idea if MSE is removeable but I would suspect that you can disable it. That's one of those things we won't know until it drops and we get our grubby little hands on it.

Some apps require Admin access but we will see how that all words. Updates apply only to apps you got through the story which is not applicable for most apps installed in PC. Mounting ISO is a nice thing. MSE bleh, is this gonna be optional to remove?

Look, you just will never like Win8 whatever people will say about it. so why do you keep hanging around in the Win8 threads and keep asking the same question.

People keep giving you heaps of cool new features other then Metro, but you keep shooting them down as irrelevant to you.

Just stay on Win7 and stop bothering us

  • Like 2

This is such an interesting post. I'll keep my opinion for the next month when Windows 8 Beta will be already released.

For those who think Windows 8 will fail because of the Metro thing I recommend you to read this

http://blogs.msdn.co...is-useless.aspx

Windows, the OS itself is not important. What makes Windows important are the applications. I think Windows 8 and Metro will be a success if it appears an App that is really worth it for everyone. And it may be a failure if nobody develops Metro Apps or not good enough.

So let's wait for the Apps and then we can discuss about the UI.

  • Like 3

here's one thing I will note when it comes to software as a product*:

you have to give your users a really good reason to purchase the latest version.

apple and adobe are terrible at this. they only release one "god feature" to make you drop several hundred or thousand on it and every year you run and buy a new one for that one "god feature".

microsoft has given us many features that are very useful and very nice and a reason to buy the next copy of windows.

the change from xp to vista was not enough for people to shell out for it, but the change from xp to 7 and the change from vista to 7 was.

imagine if the only change in windows 8 was the explorer file transfer and mabye a little bit of extra buttons in the explorer.exe windows..... would it be worth dropping 200 bucks on? not really.

it feels as if microsoft really wants to add features to the OS to make it enough of a change to justify spending the 200 or so to upgrade to it in a better way than apple ever would.

here's one thing I will note when it comes to software as a product*:

you have to give your users a really good reason to purchase the latest version.

apple and adobe are terrible at this. they only release one "god feature" to make you drop several hundred or thousand on it and every year you run and buy a new one for that one "god feature".

microsoft has given us many features that are very useful and very nice and a reason to buy the next copy of windows.

the change from xp to vista was not enough for people to shell out for it, but the change from xp to 7 and the change from vista to 7 was.

imagine if the only change in windows 8 was the explorer file transfer and mabye a little bit of extra buttons in the explorer.exe windows..... would it be worth dropping 200 bucks on? not really.

it feels as if microsoft really wants to add features to the OS to make it enough of a change to justify spending the 200 or so to upgrade to it in a better way than apple ever would.

I think the changes from XP to Vista were worth $200 but people didn't see it that way because XP was still rocking and still rocks somewhat. Changes from Windows Vista to Windows 7 were $100 due all the optimisations done behind the scene.

One must not forget the vastly improved Explorer interface and functionality (and some performance).

One must also not forget the vastly improved task manager and functionality

One must also not forget that W8 uses less memory by default giving more memory to caching and applications

One must also not forget that PC is not for everyone, the tablet has many advantages - and W8 is the first Windows that makes SENSE on a tablet

One must not forget that Windows GUI hasn't changed drastically ever. This change may help with anti-Windows stigma. It is a Windows that doesn't look like a Windows

It looks FRESH, CRISP, and FUNCTIONAL.

Windows 8 is what Windows 7 should have been + METRO.

  • Like 1

This is such an interesting post. I'll keep my opinion for the next month when Windows 8 Beta will be already released.

For those who think Windows 8 will fail because of the Metro thing I recommend you to read this

http://blogs.msdn.co...is-useless.aspx

Windows, the OS itself is not important. What makes Windows important are the applications. I think Windows 8 and Metro will be a success if it appears an App that is really worth it for everyone. And it may be a failure if nobody develops Metro Apps or not good enough.

So let's wait for the Apps and then we can discuss about the UI.

Correct. (Y)

Same thing was said about Ribbon interface, but Office 2007 beat Office 2003 in sales, and Office 2010 beat them both, by an even larger margin.

Correct. (Y)

Same thing was said about Ribbon interface, but Office 2007 beat Office 2003 in sales, and Office 2010 beat them both, by an even larger margin.

I never thought of Ribbon interface as being wrong. I thing it is cool and i am glad they are making Windows 8 Desktop using it. Metro Start Menu is replacemenet for classic Start menu and in its nature doesn't fit the rest of eco system. It would be like building Web page with one style and than user clicks something and system takes him to a page which is entirely complete visually mind transition where it feels so disconnected from previous screen and work flow user was in.

Windows 8 is going to be recorded in the books as example of what not to do when you are designing something. MS went against all UI principles. The bottom line, fugliest OS ever made in the history of Computing.

I never thought of Ribbon interface as being wrong. I thing it is cool and i am glad they are making Windows 8 Desktop using it. Metro Start Menu is replacemenet for classic Start menu and in its nature doesn't fit the rest of eco system. It would be like building Web page with one style and than user clicks something and system takes him to a page which is entirely complete visually mind transition where it feels so disconnected from previous screen and work flow user was in.

Windows 8 is going to be recorded in the books as example of what not to do when you are designing something. MS went against all UI principles. The bottom line, fugliest OS ever made in the history of Computing.

How do you know for sure that MS is not going to give the desktop a style overhaul to match the new start screen?

Ms has been known for leaving the visuals out until the last moment.

How do you know for sure that MS is not going to give the desktop a style overhaul to match the new start screen?

Ms has been known for leaving the visuals out until the last moment.

Maybe you are right, but somehow i don't see that happening. Consumer Preview will be the best indication of final release and perhaps i should wait until i pass final judgement on it. If they change Desktop style to match Metro Start Menu Style well good job.

So what happens if Windows 8 sale fails like Windows Vista? Are they going to still push Metro or completely scratch idea cause i know that Windows 8 sale is going to be terrible.

There is no possible way you can "know" any thing of that sort. Unless you have a time machine you're not telling us about.

OP's concepts look very bland and poor. They look old / MAC-ish and probably would be painful to use in the long run.

In the long run, getting rid of glass and having the classic desktop be more-so merged with METRO is a good idea (if it works ergonomically - Windows is not Ubuntu - Windows must make RATIONAL GUI choices which benefit people). Lets wait for Windows 9 for that.

Windows 8 signifies the transition of the GUI IMO.

If you get rid of the classic aero desktop, you will end up having alienated a bunch of users who are used to it. Besides the Classic Desktop in Windows 8 look more Windows 8-ish and generally BETTER.

it is for backwards compatibility.

And so thatdweebs would stop screaming that they hate the new interface.

You know if you switch to the Windows basic theme in the DP it meshes A LOT better with the metro vibe that MS is going for in Win 8.

metro interface is good for tablets/phones etc (since you usually do a single thing there) but is not good enough for full desktop environment. IMO they should've separated the two products. I don't plan running windows8 on anything with touchscreen therefor metro is useless for me.

Works equally well on desktop machine too that lacks a touchscreen. You know since you're only ever directly using one app at a time anyway. You may have 100's open but you're not using them all simultaneously, thereby making this 1 app at a time limitation-that-really-isn't-a-limitation of metro irrelevant.

..snipped..

Windows 8 is going to be recorded in the books as example of what not to do when you are designing something. MS went against all UI principles. The bottom line, fugliest OS ever made in the history of Computing.

I think you're confused with either Ubuntu's Unity crap, or any Mac ever made. But certainly not Win8.

Metro needs to less in windows 8, who cares if Aero is 7 years old, it works! Metro can have the "start" tile/marketplace/free advertising space; but that should be where it ends. When you leave that tablet-like screen you should be back to a normal Windows desktop experience. Save the rest for mobile devices. If users really have that much issue using metro for mobile and Windows 7/8 for desktop then I really feel sorry for them. People (clearly) have been capable of understanding/using different/altered variants of OS's for years. It does not have to be so unified even though that is where they are going.

On the same note, I also use OS X as my main OS these days, and I can confidently say. iOS can GTFO my (mac) OS X just as quickly as metro can GTFO my Windows partitions.

I like this kinda look:

http://blog.gsmarena...ve-looked-like/

:D

This is almost exactly what the desktop version of Windows 8 should've looked like.

I honestly don't have a problem with the "Start screen" interface for tablets. It works well. But when you're using a keyboard and mouse, these full-screen apps with giant UI elements and low information density are ridiculous. A cursor and a finger are not the same.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!