Recommended Posts

I really just don't see the appeal to a tabbed Finder in my workflow, but maybe I just do things completely differently from most people. Usually Finder actions are very brief for me. I'll either find a file/folder or do some quick operations to manage my files, but after that the windows I opened are immediately closed. I don't ever accrue Finder windows like I accrue tabs in Safari, so there's no reason that I see to save space by adding tabs.

Real men use Terminal.app for all kinds of file management operations anyway. :shifty:

  • Like 2

I guess I'm not much of a demanding person given that what I really want are under the hood changes such as updating many of the core components such as OpenSSL to at least 1.0 (it is still sitting at 0.9.8r on Mountain Lion (even though the latest, most secure version available is 0.9.8t), address the Cocoa components such as as the built in spellchecker and text technologies so that vendors can use the built in one rather than providing there own because the current implementation doesn't scale very well when dealing with large amounts of text (iWork btw doesn't use the built in spellchecker, it does its own thing), fix up frameworks that have bugs - go to bugzilla on Firefox and comb through the bug reports related to framework bugs and actually spend time fixing them up. Then there are things like OpenGL that should be upgraded to 4.2 and optimise the drivers so that performance is at least comparable to what one observes on Windows etc.

For everything else I'm pretty happy with; Finder does what it needs to do, I avoid SMB like the plague hence I really don't face issues in that area, I no longer use Microsoft Office 2011 which has saved me from the train wreck of its existence and considering I'm not a heavy going Photoshop user I find that Pixelmator does pretty much all I need so I'm pretty happy so far with Lion and previous releases with additions being 'icing on the cake' rather than 'I must really have that feature'.

  • Like 1
I've never had any issues with OS X' build-in spellcheck?

I'm talking about it from a developers perspective with very large and sophisticated documents - well, that was one of the reasons I heard as to why some developers insist on building their own spell checking library rather than using the built in one.

I'm talking about it from a developers perspective with very large and sophisticated documents - well, that was one of the reasons I heard as to why some developers insist on building their own spell checking library rather than using the built in one.

I'd take this with a grain of salt. Most apps that use their custom spell and grammar check is because they're cross platform and won't tap into the native APIs (Chrome, Firefox, Adobe CS etc.). If anything it sounds more like an excuse than anything else. In fact, iWork's custom spellcheck capabilities are behind OS X Lion's at this point.

Maybe some developer here can confirm whether OS X' build-in spelling actually performs worse than others when it comes to large documents. It's the first time I heard of it.

(iWork btw doesn't use the built in spellchecker, it does its own thing)

Where'd you hear that? I seem to remember Lion's auto-correct working in Pages during the Lion beta, well before iWork was updated for Lion.

Where'd you hear that? I seem to remember Lion's auto-correct working in Pages during the Lion beta, well before iWork was updated for Lion.

None of the OS X Snow Leopard and Lion additions are present in iWork, so it's definitely using something non-standard. Below's a comparison between the two. Notice that text transformations and substitutions (auto-correct) aren't present in Pages. Very annoying.

Pages '09 (left) - TextEdit on OS X Lion (right)

post-128385-0-69202600-1330046852.png

post-128385-0-78686700-1330046858.png

None of the OS X Snow Leopard and Lion additions are present in iWork, so it's definitely using something non-standard. Below's a comparison between the two. Notice that text transformations and substitutions (auto-correct) aren't present in Pages. Very annoying.

Pages '09 (left) - TextEdit on OS X Lion (right)

Ah. I just totally imagined that then. :p Oh well. I don't have Pages installed anymore, so I couldn't check for myself.

I guess. But this seems to be happening a lot quicker that the Leopard to Snow Leopard "update". Though I could be wrong as I skipped Leopard. By the time I moved from a G3 to Intel, Snow was at 10.6.2 so I went with that.

Anyway, I took a look at my iPod so I can how reveal (exclusively!) the exciting new features coming in OS X 10.9 Cougar:

Camera

Maps

Stocks

Weather

And maybe, if you're lucky, iBooks.

hahahahaha this made my day

Don't laugh too hard because it's the same you'll be getting in Windows 8. :p I swear both companies have come to the point where they just keep repackaging the same **** over and over again.

I know, but the thing is, Windows 8 is the first time that Windows actually gets a decent calender app. Mac always had a decent iCal since....forever.

I know it's the same **** over again, but I think, to Windows, it is new.

Is there any way to get TextEdit to revert back to opening a new document when launched? Launching to an Open dialog is a bit annoying as I often launch it to paste in some text.

Interested in this, too!

Glassed Silver:ios

This is a pretty big change I haven't seen discussed before. Interesting read:

http://www.appleinsi...he_menubar.html

Not bad, I like what they?re doing. This is nowhere as powerful as the Ribbon interface, but it?s way leaner.

Small apps with nearly no control/functionality are best with the upcoming Apple toolbars, but I think every developer on Windows will understand that the Ribbon interface is the most superior interface we have ever seen so far, it?s perfectly adapted for big applications (Office, 2D and 3D CAD Drawing, Simulation software, Image and video editing), and they will all choose this path. It?s just a question of time. iWork next to Office has proven itself being inefficient with all its different GUI elements. People who can work faster in iWork, it?s just because Office 2011 lags and it?s poorly optimized.

Nevertheless, I?m happy with the change.

In my opinion the Ribbon is as powerful as spreading out all of the system's toolbar buttons onto the desktop. Whether they're actually relevant for what you're doing right now isn't even being asked.

This is why the Ribbon gets messy easily, but at least it has a lean UI and they didn?t miss any option. Still, it is light-years ahead of menus.

Fine-tuning contextual Ribbons could fix this problem though.

The Ribbon gets bad when they include it in small apps. It actually makes them look like they?re for Pro users, when really, they?re not (like the new Explorer, ugh? !!!)

In CAD drawing and Simulation software though, just to name an example, nothing beats the Ribbon, because there is no way possible you can predict what the user will need. Even if there are billions of things in the toolbar, you actually need them all.

The Ribbon, for the average user, is absolutely terrible. I'm sure any IT people here can tell many stories of people wanting their copies of Office 2003 back. I think it has improved since it was introduced, but it's still too much information on a lot of applications.

IMO, something along the lines of Spotlight for an application (basically what help is on most Mac apps these days) combined with menus works best. I can type faster than I can click, if I can open a menu with my keyboard and search for any command I could want, it would absolutely be the fastest for power users.

Talking about OS's running out of ideas. They are not running out of ideas. The PC desktop is coming out of its infancy. the basic Human needs for the computer have been reached. Companies can only improve upon those needs until new useful technologies have been discovered. We might need another Einstein to discover these technologies. And "NO" another Steve Jobs won't cut it this time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!